Interesting point. It’s strange they aren’t breaking it down between active cases and inactive cases. Then a newly found inactive case found through antibody testing could be correctly recorded as an inactive case, but also one they hadn’t known about before.
You are applying common sense... While they need things to fit within their narrative...
Explain the common sense difference between an "inactive" and an "active" case of a COVID-19 infection, because anybody at this point that "thinks" they have the definite answer, is blowing smoke, and should be in the WH.
Anybody know the difference between inactive and active herpes, because your partner that just infected doesn't.
Are you suggesting that people don't recover from COVID-19? I haven't seen a study that confirms that yet, just speculation.
Even the Johns Hopkins map includes data on recovered cases - which are considered to be inactive cases IMHO.
