Interesting point. It’s strange they aren’t breaking it down between active cases and inactive cases. Then a newly found inactive case found through antibody testing could be correctly recorded as an inactive case, but also one they hadn’t known about before.
You are applying common sense... While they need things to fit within their narrative...
Explain the common sense difference between an "inactive" and an "active" case of a COVID-19 infection, because anybody at this point that "thinks" they have the definite answer, is blowing smoke, and should be in the WH.
Anybody know the difference between inactive and active herpes, because your partner that just infected doesn't.
Are you suggesting that people don't recover from COVID-19? I haven't seen a study that confirms that yet, just speculation.
Even the Johns Hopkins map includes data on recovered cases - which are considered to be inactive cases IMHO.
No my point was mainly, nobody knows, and society has been behind the curve of its progression since day 1, and it ain't over, except it appears for those who do want to guess/speculate.
Regarding herpes, a person infected can easily spread it to other places on their bodies, eyes being the worst, and herpes can be infectious with almost no symptoms of the carrier.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
