360View himself posts 20 links to articles each day, almost as if he is a paid poster here only doing it for the money.
A classic tactic for delivering misinformation is to bombard people with conflicting reports.
I am not a paid poster. I average posting here on this tread about 4 articles concerning coronaviruses. I do speed read through many times more articles, the majority of them not on coronavirus.
I agree that some of the medical articles conflict with each other, maybe 15% to 30%, but that is not unusual.
50% of the financial and political articles conflict with one another.
It is presently a huge issue in worldwide science that 40% or more of the published experimental results claimed cannot be “reproduced” by other scientists carefully following the original instructions.
It was previously assumed that a published experiment could be repeated 20 times and come out the same way 19 times. This is the so-called P=0.05, or said another way: 95% confidence interval.
Hacking is not just happening in the computer and internet world, so called P-Hacking is happening at universities by those seeking jobs, money and the “tenured professor” status that can mean you have a lifetime job.
My original purpose in posting COVID-19 articles was that I was going to read them to potentially protect myself as an older man with one pre-existing medical condition (skipping heart beat since birth) and I thought many Moparts members were “in the same boat.
Relax, Paul Revere got a lot of flack about waking up the neighborhood.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
