Interesting point. It’s strange they aren’t breaking it down between active cases and inactive cases. Then a newly found inactive case found through antibody testing could be correctly recorded as an inactive case, but also one they hadn’t known about before.
You are applying common sense... While they need things to fit within their narrative...
Explain the common sense difference between an "inactive" and an "active" case of a COVID-19 infection, because anybody at this point that "thinks" they have the definite answer, is blowing smoke, and should be in the WH.
Anybody know the difference between inactive and active herpes, because your partner that just infected doesn't.
Contagious. Or not. You catch the AIDS, it's never inactive. Likewise herpes, but the way of spreading, or not, is different.
I had a little cold 6 months ago. Call it inactive if you like, I can't give it to anyone. But the anti-bodies from that infection are still floating around in my body.
If this crap wasn't so contagious, it would be a non issue.
Last edited by CMcAllister; 05/11/2005:20 PM.
If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.
