There really is not enough reliable data to truly know just where we are in this thing. Then there are those that downplay the risk and there are those that inflate the risk depending on their agenda.
I want to again be clear here, my question is; does the science and data justify the response? And the truth of the matter is that we just don't know. There is not enough information nor is much of that information reliable.
Pretty much hits the nail square on the head IMO
A little back pedaling is what in my opinion, I see of past claims.
But then nobody should forget, a broken clock that still has two hands, is still correct twice a day, meaning if you hear enough different "opinions", chances are good that at least one of them will be proven correct.
Reality check, that half the population is smarter then 50% of the people and it's a constantly contested fact.
