....... my question is; does the science and data justify the response? And the truth of the matter is that we just don't know. There is not enough information nor is much of that information reliable.....
Thus the vagueness of posts. How reliable is the data and how timely is the data? As soon as influences outside science are injected into the process of evaluation the statistical outcome is swayed. My question is: why is the data being influenced? The outcome will be what it is. The precise (as possible) data needs full disclosure for accuracy to prevail. Transparency from all sources will help to that end. I know (from the available reports) that even with California's efforts a new spike (in moving average) of new dx and deaths is occuring.
