Maybe I've been asleep for the last ten years, but is this statement from the article believable?
" That’s a bit shy of TFS’s claim, but if nothing else, it does bear out the stingy nature of Westech’s Superflow dynamometer."
Nah, Mr. Stiltskin
I was aghast at both that
and the fact that HotRod's(HR) and Trick Flow's(TF) flow bench results were identical. They corresponded(a good word in this instance *ahem*) right down to the last CFM. Shocking! Methinks that HR may have
simply co-opted the TF data. (I need that whistling smiley..there we are)
Is this what passes for automotive hi-performance journalism? It appears so..
Maybe S. Dulcich can be consulted on this matter.
On Edit: I'm not that new..I had an account a decade ago, but lost my username and log-on creds. So this is a new beginning..hopefully
