I think the only real cut and dry deduction was for the tires...You can't expect a perfect score when two tires were made in Canada and two in the US....I don't think you could even come up with a reasonable explanation for the possibility of how that could have happened...
The rest of the deductions seem like hogwash or personal opinion of the judges...A nick in the kick panel could have been there when new?
But with a car as perfect as this one, they need to look for things that are not perfect....not look for things that are perfect...If the trim had issues, then that's a deduction etc....
THE PROBLEM I HAVE UNDERSTANDING...Are ALL the cars held to the same level of scrutiny?

Questions asked about deductions for reproduction batteries vs original batteries, or tires...those are legitimate questions....
And the simple fact the results are so vague ... well that's just bs.