Quote:

Quote:



Hey Ghost, I'm not perfect either, nor right
all the time. I gotten some really good posts from you, as well as some other members. Thanks
for the "education without the BIAS", Ghost. Just
remember we are all still "learning" and I'm no
GURU. Hats off to you all.
NOTE: I will try to answer your questions to the
best of my ability.






your answers are based upon opinion, conjecture and theoretical modifications of builds written up in this (and maybe other) forum threads.

YOU HAVE NOT PROVIDED ANY PERSONAL QUANTITATIVE DATA FOR YOUR HYPOTHESES EITHER FROM DYNO OR DRAG STRIP PERFORMANCE NUMBERS.

Due to this, your answers are about as legitimate and trustworthy as half the people who put up "forum" knowledge due to stuff they read from other people, who have read from other people, who have actually done the work.

413's are not special blocks, its the owners of them who believe they are.




By the way, you talk about timeslips. you had
not indicated what chassis, you wanted to see
the mill in. Secondly, as far as the 413's and
MAX-WEDGE 413's, you can go to any HISTORICAL
CHRYSLER PERFORMANCE WEBSITE and look up the
info on 413 road tests and performance data. I
do not use OTHER FORUMS to gather data. MY own
personal experiences and data from Chrysler
tech books, Direct Connection (now) Mopar
Performance and constantly talking to local racers/builders as well as Chrysler Techs. MY
opinions are not "gospel", but I CAN point you in
the "right way" for more performance. If I am
wrong, I do admit it. When I am right, I have
info to back it up. Opinions I respect most,
unless they either make no sense or you're trying
to be an "irritant". If the latter, your wasting
YOUR time.


"Stupidity is Ignorance on Steroids"
"Yeah, it's hopped to over 160" (quote by Kowalski in the movie Vanishing Point 1970 - Cupid Productions)