Originally Posted by stumpy
The order wasn't the rule of law she broke it was a legal summons issued to her. Which she tore up and ignored.


We can debate whether or not an unconstitutional law is valid, whether one is morally or legally obligated to obey such laws, how we should treat people with the courage to act on their principles. Obviously, some Governors are treating their citizens with more benevolence than others.

But that is straying off topic. Don't get it locked.

What I'm seeing is the predictions of disaster that were made, as some of these states started to open before "experts" thought they should, do not appear to be valid, so far. That's a good thing as successes in some places will force others to do the same as they run out of excuses to keep people under their thumb.


If the results don't match the theory, change the theory.