Quote:

Jeez...what is the deal about the front suspension. Its all stock, except for something that helps the seriously bad bumpsteer issue, like the pic shown in this thread. So what if it has more travel than stock. You think some of the other cars don't have trimmed stops, or whatever it takes to make more travel.

Anybody here ever owned a Mustang, Falcon, Maverick, or any Ford with those shock towers. What about a Chevy II. If you have, you know the front suspension is junk, even if new and needs help, to be stable at much of any speed, much less 140. The steering box, drag-link, tie rod setup on a Mopar is much better and does not have serious bumpsteer issues, even at full droop. If you are complaining about correcting something that could be dangerous, you are really reaching for an excuse

As far as the rear carb bowl supply line, that is just fine. No internal mods or anything else needed. Exactly how much fuel you guys think it needs.

Monte





the deal on the front suspension is it is supposed to look stock. what part of fast do you not understand? fast-factory appearing stock tires. why is it every single time something comes up about mopars vs another brand u always seem to bash the mopars? on a mopar site we should be able to discuss issues like this. after all i think because mopars have been cheated over the years it just makes people mad to this day if the mopars have a disadvantage due to rules.