Quote:

I do not like this design. There are no triangles in the geometry or structure -a triangle is the strongest geometric shape. Look at a stock k frame...now look at the latest so called improvement.

The K frame is an integral part of a car's suspension and is a major component the overall rigidity of the chassis.
Can you say twist???

Having slotted holes on 2/4 mounts is just poor design and the new design looks like it will flex nicely under duress esp with an iron head 440 sitting on it. I would not try this product even if it were free for an A body road course car, let alone a big fat B body

Where are the mounts for the right and left side torque rods which experience has shown are required to hold the engine in the correct geometric position at all times??? Do i need to post the photos of the right side collector being pushed to the ground, the compressed engine isolators and the torn exhaust hangers before we figured out the problem??

Back to the million dollar question-how many seconds will this product cut from the current lap times which are btw quite good for a large fat car.

This product is in the wrong forum...and i reluctantly post, but it's tough to be spectator when i see products that don't measure up.



Thanks Tom again for your positive and useful input! I do not think you can look at something and throw it under the bus with '0' factual basis for the criticism, but I have passed these comments onto QA1. I am sure there Engineers at there fully CNC'd, 125,000sq/ft facility will be attempting to cover all these basis.

So you know we are already talking about the torque resolution. I am going to be working on that during the mock up phase.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwhpIkmi5LE

Here is little video of how they make a K-Member.

1968 Pro-Touring Dodge Charger
*2011 Optima Ultimate Street Car Challenge Invitee
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/features/1203phr_1968_dodge_charger/index.html