Quote:
Quote:
But I've got nice unrusted stock LCA's that are worn between the pivot arm and the LCA stamping holes creating slop. They are 40 years old now. I'd like to see them tight with very little movement.
That is exactly my situation however I am not tempted to pull the trigger on those arms because I am a technical guy and they look weak. So far I have not seen any proof that these LCA are as good or better than the OEM (other than a non scientific destructive test done in 1 magazine). I have a concern with the torsionnal stiffness when we use big sway bars and also with the durability at the transition from the solid portion to the clevis at the end. If QA1 have re-engineer everything they should be able to state what they have improved and to show proper test / analysis results because I am sure I am not the only guy who is thinking that way.
Does every part we buy for cars come with proper test and analysis paperwork?? Not sure, I don't have much in the way of that........I will obviously push for this due to the questions being raised about the constructability of the UCA and LCA's in the past.
| 
