Originally Posted By prochargedmopar
Originally Posted By Uberpube
Originally Posted By polyspheric
My point was that higher CFM isn't a reliable indicator of superior boosted flow. The infamous 2JZ-GTE Supra factory twin turbo head needs no mods, not even a valve job, to produce 700 hp from 183" on high boost. The extremely similar (by flow and mean cross-sectional area) RB26, 7M, etc. are down by hundreds of hp under the same conditions.
Why is the GTE head so superior? Toyota doesn't know, the port locations were compromised to allow larger water jackets (the N/A GE head has better ports, but only NA). It was an accident.


When I was working in Japan, I saw tons of 2JZ cars tuned along with tons of RB26 cars, many running the same single turbo kits, and there never was "hundreds" of horsepower between those engines when running similar setups..,The 2JZ and the RB26 almost have identical power curves, its just shifted downward in the RPM band because of the added stroke, the 2JZ just acts like an RB with a stroker crank. There are lots of bone stock RB26's over 700rwhp running around Japan, the guy I worked with over there had an RB26 Stagea wagon with a HKS T51r, 750rwhp on an unopened N1 Rb26 motor..


I guess it's time for a 2JZ powered 73 Dart to hit the streets............
NOT

LOL

No not at all, but it's a good path to follow to build a turbo small block... I met a guy over there about 10 years ago that was doing cylinder head work for all out 2jz/Rb/Sr turbo motor, I remember him saying that as you dropped compression for turbo use, you had to go to work on the exhaust side more, as the motor mass flow rate increase, and motors are highly intake biased to start with.
I was more interested in Rotary when I was over there, and I met a lot of people who are/were pretty famous in the import circles, I kinda wish I paid more attention to the piston motor side of it now, those guys spend tons of time on R&D testing...

Last edited by Uberpube; 05/20/17 09:01 AM.