Re: N.O.S. Superbird Nose Cone Tech VS/ Repos
« Reply #5 on: Today at 07:48:46 AM » Quote Mopar John


[Here is a picture of my NOS Superbird nosecone. It is missing the closure panel. While I'm on this topic I would like to add my thoughts on the NOS vs REPRO debate. If you have a quality original car NOS is the way to go. If your building a clone thats where the repro parts belong. There are more clones going together than originals being restored and if they use up the rare parts on the clones it's sad. When you use NOS parts on your restoration be sure to include pictures of the parts with the box or label and as they are installed on the car. Also keep your receipts. Later if you decide to sell and you can prove you used NOS vs repro it will make a big differance even though it doesn't look much differant.



1969 Daytona 440 L9B410772 1970 Coronet 500 383 Presently owned 1970 Superbird 440 U 166242 1970 Superbird 440 U 174597 1970 Superbird 440-6 V 179697 1970 Coronet RT 440 U 224126 1968 Road Runner 426 J 134509 1970 Daytona Replica 318 G 178701