|
Re: Caltrac Science???
[Re: Monte_Smith]
#1693070
11/02/14 07:29 PM
11/02/14 07:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591 Canton, Ohio
Sport440
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
|
Quote:
Front segment stiffer = better......period. The stiffer the better. There is no instance where some spring wrap is good.
Monte
I agree that stiffer is better, but disagree that there are No instances where some spring wrap/flex is good.
The Caltrac design/science has this flex and minimized spring wrap feature. When they could of easily come up with a Solid front segment design IMO.
SSM bars for the Mopars make the front segment 99% solid IMO I know Ive had them and tried them.
When I tried them on my A body 20" front segment, with 500# of torque, it made the front segment rotation to violent, with no real amount of spring wrap.
Granted, I didn't go to the extra effort of trying to control this with a stiffer shock.
I just want to point out that the Caltrac Science, does have some flex/spring wrap built in, When they, like I said, could of removed that flex/wrap up and made them solid with a design more like SSM bars.
I don't even think SSM makes their bars for mopars anymore. They still do for Fords and chevys though. Not arguing here, just talking
|
|
|
|
|
|