That was a SFT cam........ def rowdier than what you just tested.
It’s important to keep in mind these motors weren’t tested on the same dyno.
And not only were they not the same dyno, but between your build, Russ’ build, and the one I tested...... they were tested on 3 different makes of dynos, using 3 different data acquisition systems.
Sure...... it’s possible they all agree with each other really closely........ but I wouldn’t trust them to be close enough to consider the results as truly “apples to apples”.
Exactly. From a comparison stand point, mine seems to be a bit high relative to your example and Greg's. But you know that I'm not about the dyno numbers, but the learning from changes. I do think the shape of power curves, change in power from motor changes, and jetting information is transferable.
