Basically IF any civil/criminal action where to result over misrepresentation of said vehicle before/during/after it's sale/ownership/etc,...the one bringing forth suit, would have to show proof of intent, not a bunch of he said/he did, would have/could have, actual intent to defraud, and the actual "loss" one incurred, rather than a perceived loss


Basically it's a bunch of horse dodo regarding the fender tag, no one knows when, how, why, what for?, nor can they prove it...if one is so concerned about the "pedigree" of their investment, then they should spend the time/money to make sure their portfolio is sound in it's investments