Originally Posted By Duner
I have dyno charts showing RWHP - but the numbers are overly optimistic / false when compared to actual timeslips. Since all dynos are different, I assume the one I was on would be considered "happy" or "not stingy". LOL It worked well for a tuning tool, but that's about it.

With that said:
705rwhp only produced 10.51 @ 130.13 mph at 4190# in my truck.


Actually using my numbers I think your 705rwhp quoted is actually closer to fly hp!....and as you say "optimistic" by a long way I reckon, as this is what I got for your timeslip>
Power to Weight Ratio: 5.87
60 Foot E.T. : 1.46
1/8 Mile E.T. : 6.63
1/8 Mile Trap Speed : 102.53
1/4 Mile E.T. : 10.51
1/4 Mile Trap Speed : 128
thats with a hp input of 714/4190lbs

what is probably more correct is if put in 748fly hp you get>
60 Foot E.T. : 1.44
1/8 Mile E.T. : 6.53
1/8 Mile Trap Speed : 104.14
1/4 Mile E.T. : 10.34
1/4 Mile Trap Speed : 130
thats probably more in line with a heavy as trying to get 4000+ to move ain't easy, your gonna lose some ET, set aside aero issues, thats a hard one!

I just got too much time on my hands and don't race anymore frown ..and I'm stuck in front of my computer mostly with my work.

Last edited by rb446; 02/05/16 11:33 PM.

1969 'Cuda 446ci, best 9.96@133.9 in 1990
1971 340 'Cuda, best 11.01@122.8 in 1987