|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
[Re: RUNCHARGER]
#1304043
09/16/12 06:28 PM
09/16/12 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,313 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,313
Prospect, PA
|
Quote:
Maybe I reverse engineer stuff. I would set it up with as much stroke as you can get with that particular crank. I would then mock it up before decking and see where it was at. Then I would decide how much to deck it.
Sheldon
Me too. You'll be able to figure out if the shelving piston height will work and either move the CD around, cut the deck, or gasket it to what you want.
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/15/12 12:43 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
CompWedgeEngines
|
09/15/12 12:49 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
sr4440
|
09/15/12 01:04 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
gregsdart
|
09/15/12 01:36 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/15/12 05:28 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
67_Satellite
|
09/15/12 02:01 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
MR_P_BODY
|
09/15/12 02:56 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/15/12 04:22 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/16/12 04:52 AM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
440Jim
|
09/16/12 03:30 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/16/12 03:57 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/16/12 09:21 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
RUNCHARGER
|
09/16/12 09:42 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
23T Hemmee
|
09/16/12 09:49 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
BSB67
|
09/16/12 10:28 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/16/12 10:31 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/16/12 10:53 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/17/12 03:14 AM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/17/12 02:59 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/17/12 03:06 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/17/12 03:07 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/17/12 03:47 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Thumperdart
|
09/17/12 04:05 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
jafr
|
09/15/12 05:19 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Thumperdart
|
09/15/12 04:45 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Cab_Burge
|
09/16/12 04:42 AM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Evil Spirit
|
09/16/12 08:45 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Brian Hafliger
|
09/16/12 09:04 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Evil Spirit
|
09/17/12 03:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|