|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
[Re: Belvedere1]
#1304036
09/16/12 11:30 AM
09/16/12 11:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,925 NC
440Jim
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,925
NC
|
Quote:
Be prepared to spend some extra $$ on getting that crank to balance and cutting the counterweights for clearance. I hope yours works out better than mine did.
To get clearance of the counterweights in the low deck block, there are several ways. 1) lathe turn (round) the counterweights to about 7.25" dia, keep bobweight ~2350g 2) put large bevels on the edges of the counterweights 3) grind the clearance in the block and leave the crank about 7.50" dia
The larger the bevels, the larger dia you can leave the counterweights. The front and rear (large) counterweights will fit at a larger dia than the inner (smaller) ones.
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/15/12 12:43 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
CompWedgeEngines
|
09/15/12 12:49 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
sr4440
|
09/15/12 01:04 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
gregsdart
|
09/15/12 01:36 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/15/12 05:28 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
67_Satellite
|
09/15/12 02:01 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
MR_P_BODY
|
09/15/12 02:56 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/15/12 04:22 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/16/12 04:52 AM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
440Jim
|
09/16/12 03:30 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/16/12 03:57 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/16/12 09:21 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
RUNCHARGER
|
09/16/12 09:42 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
23T Hemmee
|
09/16/12 09:49 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
BSB67
|
09/16/12 10:28 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/16/12 10:31 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/16/12 10:53 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/17/12 03:14 AM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/17/12 02:59 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/17/12 03:06 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/17/12 03:07 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/17/12 03:47 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Thumperdart
|
09/17/12 04:05 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
jafr
|
09/15/12 05:19 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Thumperdart
|
09/15/12 04:45 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Cab_Burge
|
09/16/12 04:42 AM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Evil Spirit
|
09/16/12 08:45 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Brian Hafliger
|
09/16/12 09:04 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Evil Spirit
|
09/17/12 03:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|