|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
[Re: YYZ]
#1304040
09/16/12 05:21 PM
09/16/12 05:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
The crank in question should not require further machining to fit the B-block as it was made with smaller counterweights and B-sized main journals for exactly that purpose. Plus an 8-bolt flange.
Is the crank in question a crank sold by Mopar performance in/around 2003 ? If it is have you actually tried putting it in the block ?
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/15/12 12:43 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
CompWedgeEngines
|
09/15/12 12:49 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
sr4440
|
09/15/12 01:04 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
gregsdart
|
09/15/12 01:36 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/15/12 05:28 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
67_Satellite
|
09/15/12 02:01 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
MR_P_BODY
|
09/15/12 02:56 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/15/12 04:22 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/16/12 04:52 AM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
440Jim
|
09/16/12 03:30 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/16/12 03:57 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/16/12 09:21 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
RUNCHARGER
|
09/16/12 09:42 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
23T Hemmee
|
09/16/12 09:49 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
BSB67
|
09/16/12 10:28 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/16/12 10:31 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/16/12 10:53 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/17/12 03:14 AM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/17/12 02:59 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/17/12 03:06 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/17/12 03:07 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/17/12 03:47 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Thumperdart
|
09/17/12 04:05 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
jafr
|
09/15/12 05:19 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Thumperdart
|
09/15/12 04:45 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Cab_Burge
|
09/16/12 04:42 AM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Evil Spirit
|
09/16/12 08:45 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Brian Hafliger
|
09/16/12 09:04 PM
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Evil Spirit
|
09/17/12 03:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|