1969 Daytona 727 transmission
#2722366
12/07/19 06:27 PM
12/07/19 06:27 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,058 Dallas, Texas
FC7cuda
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,058
Dallas, Texas
|
This transmission was removed from a 69 Daytona back in 1972 by the current owner. It has a Feb. date on it but was not VIN stamped?? Is it possible this is/was the original transmission or is the lack of partial VIN mean it’s a warranty replacement?
Thanks
Last edited by FC7cuda; 12/07/19 06:28 PM.
68 Charger 70 Cuda
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: Morty426]
#2722460
12/08/19 07:49 AM
12/08/19 07:49 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655 western PA
mopar4ya
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
|
Not likely to be the original but might be a warranty replacement
2/3/69 on the date
How is the date determined ?
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: NANKET]
#2722468
12/08/19 09:09 AM
12/08/19 09:09 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,389 Abilene, Texas
fastmark
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,389
Abilene, Texas
|
A trans stamped like that came from a car on the assembly line. They just forgot the VIN. That’s not a replacement trans. What brings you to that conclusion? Those numbers had to do with application, date they were built and unit built. Then they were put in inventory to be installed. If they were not installed, they then stayed in inventory as excess parts. My question was the motor stamped or not? May have missed them both. What’s the SPD of the car? What are the dates stamped on other parts. Start digging, Tom. Lol.
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: mopar4ya]
#2722478
12/08/19 10:03 AM
12/08/19 10:03 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,521 Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart
Rhinotruck
|
Rhinotruck
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,521
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
|
Not likely to be the original but might be a warranty replacement
2/3/69 on the date
How is the date determined ? 10,000 day calendar the second set of numbers on the trans.
The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.
JB Rhinehart, Realist
A-Body's RULE!
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: Rhinodart]
#2722508
12/08/19 12:09 PM
12/08/19 12:09 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550 Sacramento CA
Morty426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
|
Not likely to be the original but might be a warranty replacement
2/3/69 on the date
How is the date determined ? 10,000 day calendar the second set of numbers on the trans. Yep 2747 is from the 10000 calendar that they used.
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: fastmark]
#2722509
12/08/19 12:11 PM
12/08/19 12:11 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550 Sacramento CA
Morty426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
|
A trans stamped like that came from a car on the assembly line. They just forgot the VIN. That’s not a replacement trans. What brings you to that conclusion? Those numbers had to do with application, date they were built and unit built. Then they were put in inventory to be installed. If they were not installed, they then stayed in inventory as excess parts. My question was the motor stamped or not? May have missed them both. What’s the SPD of the car? What are the dates stamped on other parts. Start digging, Tom. Lol. I have a 671 70 transmission and it is like this one with no VIN. I think it is an early field replacement
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: NANKET]
#2722522
12/08/19 12:46 PM
12/08/19 12:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,748 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,748
Rio Linda, CA
|
A trans stamped like that came from a car on the assembly line. They just forgot the VIN. That’s not a replacement trans. Elaborate.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: JDMopar]
#2723214
12/11/19 12:07 PM
12/11/19 12:07 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,058 Dallas, Texas
FC7cuda
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,058
Dallas, Texas
|
Did you look on the top edge of the bellhousing? I had a numbers matching 69 Charger R/T that had the engine and trans vin stamped on the top of the flanges of the motor and transmission. Both the motor, and transmission had the full VIN stamped on them, and they were right next to each other on the flanges. Similar to what was common in 68? I don't recall seeing any number there, but will confirm again tonight. As far as any VIN numbers on the block, I will be checking with the owner but will not have answer till January at best. Thanks
68 Charger 70 Cuda
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: FC7cuda]
#2723283
12/11/19 05:02 PM
12/11/19 05:02 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550 Sacramento CA
Morty426
master
|
master
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
|
Did you look on the top edge of the bellhousing? I had a numbers matching 69 Charger R/T that had the engine and trans vin stamped on the top of the flanges of the motor and transmission. Both the motor, and transmission had the full VIN stamped on them, and they were right next to each other on the flanges. Similar to what was common in 68? I don't recall seeing any number there, but will confirm again tonight. As far as any VIN numbers on the block, I will be checking with the owner but will not have answer till January at best. Thanks If that was done in early 69 that would have been a mistake.
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: Morty426]
#2723428
12/12/19 11:41 AM
12/12/19 11:41 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,058 Dallas, Texas
FC7cuda
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,058
Dallas, Texas
|
Did you look on the top edge of the bellhousing? I had a numbers matching 69 Charger R/T that had the engine and trans vin stamped on the top of the flanges of the motor and transmission. Both the motor, and transmission had the full VIN stamped on them, and they were right next to each other on the flanges. Similar to what was common in 68? I don't recall seeing any number there, but will confirm again tonight. As far as any VIN numbers on the block, I will be checking with the owner but will not have answer till January at best. Thanks If that was done in early 69 that would have been a mistake. anomaly yes, mistake no.
68 Charger 70 Cuda
|
|
|
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission
[Re: FC7cuda]
#2724418
12/16/19 10:49 AM
12/16/19 10:49 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,480 Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
JDMopar
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,480
Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
|
I sold that car to a Moparts member in the early 2000's, but I don't remember who? I wish I had taken pics of the VIN stamps, because I remember thinking it was odd. The car was F8 green, and IIRC, it went to Minnesnowda.
|
|
|
|
|