Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
1969 Daytona 727 transmission #2722366
12/07/19 06:27 PM
12/07/19 06:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,057
Dallas, Texas
F
FC7cuda Offline OP
super stock
FC7cuda  Offline OP
super stock
F

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,057
Dallas, Texas
This transmission was removed from a 69 Daytona back in 1972 by the current owner. It has a Feb. date on it but was not VIN stamped?? Is it possible this is/was the original transmission or is the lack of partial VIN mean it’s a warranty replacement?

Thanks

27C2519C-A41E-4B55-981D-1DDFAD582EA9.jpegDEAE1B81-CE66-47B5-A23C-9939FBF9D35A.jpeg
Last edited by FC7cuda; 12/07/19 06:28 PM.


68 Charger
70 Cuda
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: FC7cuda] #2722447
12/08/19 12:57 AM
12/08/19 12:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
M
Morty426 Offline
master
Morty426  Offline
master
M

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
Not likely to be the original but might be a warranty replacement

2/3/69 on the date

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: Morty426] #2722453
12/08/19 01:40 AM
12/08/19 01:40 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
N
NANKET Offline
master
NANKET  Offline
master
N

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
A trans stamped like that came from a car on the assembly line. They just forgot the VIN. That’s not a replacement trans.

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: Morty426] #2722460
12/08/19 07:49 AM
12/08/19 07:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
M
mopar4ya Offline
master
mopar4ya  Offline
master
M

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,655
western PA
Originally Posted by Morty426
Not likely to be the original but might be a warranty replacement

2/3/69 on the date



How is the date determined ?

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: NANKET] #2722468
12/08/19 09:09 AM
12/08/19 09:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,363
Abilene, Texas
F
fastmark Offline
master
fastmark  Offline
master
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,363
Abilene, Texas
Originally Posted by NANKET
A trans stamped like that came from a car on the assembly line. They just forgot the VIN. That’s not a replacement trans.

What brings you to that conclusion? Those numbers had to do with application, date they were built and unit built. Then they were put in inventory to be installed. If they were not installed, they then stayed in inventory as excess parts.

My question was the motor stamped or not? May have missed them both. What’s the SPD of the car? What are the dates stamped on other parts. Start digging, Tom. Lol.

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: mopar4ya] #2722478
12/08/19 10:03 AM
12/08/19 10:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,458
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart Offline
Rhinotruck
Rhinodart  Offline
Rhinotruck

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,458
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Originally Posted by mopar4ya
Originally Posted by Morty426
Not likely to be the original but might be a warranty replacement

2/3/69 on the date



How is the date determined ?


10,000 day calendar the second set of numbers on the trans.


The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.

JB Rhinehart, Realist

A-Body's RULE!
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: Rhinodart] #2722508
12/08/19 12:09 PM
12/08/19 12:09 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
M
Morty426 Offline
master
Morty426  Offline
master
M

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
Originally Posted by Rhinodart
Originally Posted by mopar4ya
Originally Posted by Morty426
Not likely to be the original but might be a warranty replacement

2/3/69 on the date



How is the date determined ?


10,000 day calendar the second set of numbers on the trans.


Yep 2747 is from the 10000 calendar that they used.

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: fastmark] #2722509
12/08/19 12:11 PM
12/08/19 12:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
M
Morty426 Offline
master
Morty426  Offline
master
M

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
Originally Posted by fastmark
Originally Posted by NANKET
A trans stamped like that came from a car on the assembly line. They just forgot the VIN. That’s not a replacement trans.

What brings you to that conclusion? Those numbers had to do with application, date they were built and unit built. Then they were put in inventory to be installed. If they were not installed, they then stayed in inventory as excess parts.

My question was the motor stamped or not? May have missed them both. What’s the SPD of the car? What are the dates stamped on other parts. Start digging, Tom. Lol.


I have a 671 70 transmission and it is like this one with no VIN.

I think it is an early field replacement

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: NANKET] #2722522
12/08/19 12:46 PM
12/08/19 12:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,618
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,618
Rio Linda, CA
Originally Posted by NANKET
A trans stamped like that came from a car on the assembly line. They just forgot the VIN. That’s not a replacement trans.


Elaborate.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: Morty426] #2722856
12/10/19 12:48 AM
12/10/19 12:48 AM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 157
none
T
The Black Car Offline
member
The Black Car  Offline
member
T

Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 157
none
I’ve got a 672 trans no VIN...I always assumed it was a warranty replacement.

I also have a 727 H/D, 4-planetary unit with Nothing stamped on it ANYWHERE. Only casting dates, but that’s in a one off executive Imperial Limousine.

???

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: The Black Car] #2722876
12/10/19 07:04 AM
12/10/19 07:04 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,056
Michigan
A
A727Tflite Online content
master
A727Tflite  Online Content
master
A

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,056
Michigan
No number on the pan rail means it got a new case,
The plant would not ship a trans assembly without numbers on the pan rail.

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: FC7cuda] #2723071
12/10/19 08:02 PM
12/10/19 08:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,473
Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
J
JDMopar Offline
master
JDMopar  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,473
Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
Did you look on the top edge of the bellhousing? scope I had a numbers matching 69 Charger R/T that had the engine and trans vin stamped on the top of the flanges of the motor and transmission. Both the motor, and transmission had the full VIN stamped on them, and they were right next to each other on the flanges.

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: JDMopar] #2723214
12/11/19 12:07 PM
12/11/19 12:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,057
Dallas, Texas
F
FC7cuda Offline OP
super stock
FC7cuda  Offline OP
super stock
F

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,057
Dallas, Texas
Originally Posted by JDMopar
Did you look on the top edge of the bellhousing? scope I had a numbers matching 69 Charger R/T that had the engine and trans vin stamped on the top of the flanges of the motor and transmission. Both the motor, and transmission had the full VIN stamped on them, and they were right next to each other on the flanges.


Similar to what was common in 68? I don't recall seeing any number there, but will confirm again tonight.

As far as any VIN numbers on the block, I will be checking with the owner but will not have answer till January at best.

Thanks



68 Charger
70 Cuda
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: FC7cuda] #2723283
12/11/19 05:02 PM
12/11/19 05:02 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
M
Morty426 Offline
master
Morty426  Offline
master
M

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 9,550
Sacramento CA
Originally Posted by FC7cuda
Originally Posted by JDMopar
Did you look on the top edge of the bellhousing? scope I had a numbers matching 69 Charger R/T that had the engine and trans vin stamped on the top of the flanges of the motor and transmission. Both the motor, and transmission had the full VIN stamped on them, and they were right next to each other on the flanges.


Similar to what was common in 68? I don't recall seeing any number there, but will confirm again tonight.

As far as any VIN numbers on the block, I will be checking with the owner but will not have answer till January at best.

Thanks


If that was done in early 69 that would have been a mistake.

Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: Morty426] #2723428
12/12/19 11:41 AM
12/12/19 11:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,057
Dallas, Texas
F
FC7cuda Offline OP
super stock
FC7cuda  Offline OP
super stock
F

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,057
Dallas, Texas
Originally Posted by Morty426
Originally Posted by FC7cuda
Originally Posted by JDMopar
Did you look on the top edge of the bellhousing? scope I had a numbers matching 69 Charger R/T that had the engine and trans vin stamped on the top of the flanges of the motor and transmission. Both the motor, and transmission had the full VIN stamped on them, and they were right next to each other on the flanges.


Similar to what was common in 68? I don't recall seeing any number there, but will confirm again tonight.

As far as any VIN numbers on the block, I will be checking with the owner but will not have answer till January at best.

Thanks


If that was done in early 69 that would have been a mistake.


anomaly yes, mistake no.



68 Charger
70 Cuda
Re: 1969 Daytona 727 transmission [Re: FC7cuda] #2724418
12/16/19 10:49 AM
12/16/19 10:49 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,473
Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
J
JDMopar Offline
master
JDMopar  Offline
master
J

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,473
Candler,NC / Myrtle Beach, SC
I sold that car to a Moparts member in the early 2000's, but I don't remember who? I wish I had taken pics of the VIN stamps, because I remember thinking it was odd. The car was F8 green, and IIRC, it went to Minnesnowda.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1