Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: fattire]
#475008
09/21/09 08:57 AM
09/21/09 08:57 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295 U.S.
moparniac
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,295
U.S.
|
I had the 315/60/15 ET street Radials on my Indy EZ Headed 72 Challenger that was 3850lbs All motor and went 10.6 only time out! I had caltracs and went 1.55 60ft and 128.3mph still lean on the wideband...... whats your suspension like....
Last edited by *WeDgiE*; 09/21/09 09:01 AM.
Mopar Performance
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: fattire]
#475010
09/21/09 09:20 AM
09/21/09 09:20 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
Keep the radials. I've been 1.32 sixty foot on the 295-65 M/T Radials. Nothing trick, just the basic Cal-Trac rear suspension. What do you have for suspension? CHIP
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: fattire]
#475011
09/21/09 09:20 AM
09/21/09 09:20 AM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Friend was running the m.t. street et's then switched to the m.t. drag radials and has had better 60's..i run the m.t. drag radials on my duster and with the 416 it 60's in the low 1.40's with nothing more then xhd leafs,pinion snubber,and 50/50 drag shocks..
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#475012
09/21/09 09:30 AM
09/21/09 09:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 305 Mentor,Oh.
fattire
OP
enthusiast
|
OP
enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 305
Mentor,Oh.
|
Quote:
Keep the radials. I've been 1.32 sixty foot on the 295-65 M/T Radials. Nothing trick, just the basic Cal-Trac rear suspension. What do you have for suspension? CHIP [/quote Well when I bought the car it had air shocks so I took them off and got some cal tracks [the car back-halved] but with out the air shocks it sits to low so I had to put some coil overs on to get the hieght back.
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: fattire]
#475014
09/21/09 10:24 AM
09/21/09 10:24 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
So the car still has leaf springs? You need new ones if you have to adjust ride height w/ shocks. If you have Cal-Trac bars, call Calvert Racing and get a pair of their monoleaf springs and Rancho shocks. CHIP
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: RonP]
#475017
09/21/09 02:13 PM
09/21/09 02:13 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,117 Cleveland Ohio
10secGTX
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,117
Cleveland Ohio
|
I have to give my props to the drag radials especially if you have a heavy car. The side walls are alot stronger/stiffer. I had a 1.49 60' with the 275 D/R's this weekend and my best on slicks was a 1.45 so these get my vote
Last edited by 10secGTX; 09/21/09 05:16 PM.
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: fattire]
#475018
09/21/09 02:49 PM
09/21/09 02:49 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,163 Bend,OR USA
Cab_Burge
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,163
Bend,OR USA
|
I have a pump gas street 3400 lbs. Duster that has gone 1:43 60. ft times on 315x60x15 M/T ET Street Radials at 10:34 and 128.6 MPH, no power adders It is a ladder bar car with coil overs and a track bar, I also have a set of 13:50x30x15 ET Street bias ply tires on the same size rims as the radials. The radials will run quicker and faster on a good track versus the bias ply tires, the bias ply tires will drive easier on a bad track and not spin at the top of first gear like the radials will on a bad track I have found that after driving the radails on the street, the first pass, no matter what kind of burn out I do , will spin bad, the second pass will hook a lot better no matter on the burn out procedures I do run between 17.5 lbs and 22 lbs in the radails and 9.5 to 11.0 lbs on the bias plys on ten inch wide rims. IHTHs BTW, if you run the air pressure to low in the radials they will not hook
Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: 65signet]
#475020
09/21/09 05:05 PM
09/21/09 05:05 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
I only get 45 to 50 passes out of them before chords start showing. They go bald at about 25 passes. I do a fair amount of street driving on them too though. CHIP
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: 65signet]
#475026
09/22/09 07:34 AM
09/22/09 07:34 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
Quote:
We go to the track 2 or 3 times a month, and if you have a good day that will be like 8-10 passes in one day, at 300 for a set of tires i am looking for something that will last longer, when the tread is there they work great no complaint, when the tread goes there goes the 60 foot.
When the tread goes there goes the 60 foot? Myself, and everyone else I know running them, have the opposite happen to us. The tires get better when the tread is gone. They hook great until the chords start showing, then I replace them. Still hook with the chords showing actually. This is the case with the M/T radials anyway. CHIP
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#475027
09/22/09 07:41 AM
09/22/09 07:41 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932 Finalnd, Perkele
jyrki
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,932
Finalnd, Perkele
|
Good track = radials Marginal Track = bias ply. At lest that's my experience. The bias ply tires push the car forward even if they spin a little, while the radials really tend to loose the traction completely if they start to spin.
Plynouth VIP '67 TT IC EFI
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: blownzoom440]
#475030
09/22/09 03:50 PM
09/22/09 03:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
Quote:
i just ran 16lbs but feel i need more heat in the tirei will try longer burnouts next time.
More air pressure. CHIP
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: blownzoom440]
#475033
09/22/09 04:55 PM
09/22/09 04:55 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
My duster hooks best at 15 lbs...
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
#475034
09/22/09 04:59 PM
09/22/09 04:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,363
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
Mine likes 19.5 to 20 psi. CHIP
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: an8sec70cuda]
#475035
09/22/09 05:01 PM
09/22/09 05:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266 Renton Washington
Triple Threat
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
|
Mine are always set between 16 and 20, It will hook wherever, so I adjust rear tire pressure to adjust my reaction times.
-Dustin 67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi 68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
#475040
09/22/09 06:41 PM
09/22/09 06:41 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,537 PORT ALBERNI , BC., CANADA
superwrench
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,537
PORT ALBERNI , BC., CANADA
|
ET Street radials here...295/65's...best hook is 15.0 cold. 3700# Challenger 496 4600 convertor and 625#'s of torque. Anything above the 15 and it gets dicey as to whether it'll blow the tires off 20' out.
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: RonP]
#475042
09/22/09 07:35 PM
09/22/09 07:35 PM
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
I run 15.5-17 (hot) in mine depending on track. 325/50-15's
Ron, i love your car..
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: fattire]
#475044
09/22/09 09:58 PM
09/22/09 09:58 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,090 north cakalaky
instigator
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,090
north cakalaky
|
I would run my 295-65/15 MT radials down to 12 pounds.....1.30 60's...mid 5.60's at 128mph. My suspension appeared to seperate quite a bit out back with never picking up the front tires....maybe not enough weight transfer for the reason for such low psi..
65 Barracuda All aluminum Indy HEMI with some boost! COMING TO A TRACK NEAR YOU!
|
|
|
Re: M.T. ET Streets vs M.T. Drag radials
[Re: instigator]
#475045
09/22/09 11:35 PM
09/22/09 11:35 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,537 PORT ALBERNI , BC., CANADA
superwrench
master
|
master
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,537
PORT ALBERNI , BC., CANADA
|
This is getting interesting. I say that I hook good at around 15 cold....just that I've never tried it lower than that because it seems OK at that pressure. So many others on here running up at 18 and 20#'s that it almost made no sense to go lower.....then sit back and complain about the crappy tires! I'm wondering if there's a little more 60' left in it if I try going down a tad more? It hooked hard at Pinks in Seattle, and seems good at our tracks here...but there's always that search for that "little bit more". One thing for sure though....I'll never run a bias slick again...the radials run the track so straight compared to a slick at 11#'s. Next year I guess.....
|
|
|
|
|