All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
#2389472
10/18/17 07:49 PM
10/18/17 07:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Barring any new "challenge" pops up that is a bleepin' show-stopper to my trip to VT this weekend, the next incarnation of The MoPig's engine will be flogged on Dwayne Porter's dyno this Saturday. Everybody loves a good "Guess they dyno results!" thread, so I'll put out all the details for you to come up w/ your #s. >>>>>>>>>> I. I'm working off the same 440 + .060" (452) short block as before, but... - It's got a fresh hone, and I changed from Total Seal "Gapless Top" rings to conventional rings gapped at .020" top / .024" second - The ring pack also changed to use a Napier 2nd ring, and the oil rings have a little less tension than the last "standard" tension set... 16-18# vs 20-22#, IIRC - I've made a few tweaks to improve oil control (Milodon "Street Hemi" style w/ windage tray, added a crank scraper, and had some additional oil-return baffles welded in the pan) - New Eagle 4340 crank, instead of my old OEM piece - BHJ SFI balancer that I sent back to BHJ to "rebuild" before putting it back into service - After break-in, it'll have 10w40 in it, whereas I used to run 20w50 II. The heads are standard-port Edelbrock Victors that Dwayne Porter finished for me. - The heads were originally used by Brian at IMM for a 400 build-up, but he pulled them off after dynoing that combination and I ended up buying them some years later - I had Hughes do their CNC chamber work - Dwayne did the porting and a touch-up to Brian's valve job - Avg CSA is 2.76" and Min CSA is 2.65" (presuming I did the measurements & calcs correctly) Flow results (because EVERYBODY knows that flow #s tell you EXACTLY how much power an engine is going to make, right? ) INTAKE - 0.100 -- 75 0.200 -- 151 0.300 -- 220 0.400 -- 280 0.500 -- 326 0.550 -- 338 0.600 -- 346 0.650 -- 350 0.700 -- 355 EXHAUST --- w/ 2" pipe added 0.100 -- 55 0.200 -- 116 0.300 -- 155 0.400 -- 194 0.500 -- 211 -- 238 0.550 -- 222 -- 249 0.600 -- 231 -- 259 0.650 -- 237 -- 267 0.700 -- 243 -- 274 Oh, the chambers are smaller than my old Stage VIs, which has bumped up the CR from about 10.8 to just under 11.5. We'll be using pump 93 E10 w/ a blend of race fuel to increase the octane some. III. Cam specs Oh, boy... my first venture into solid roller territory , whereas I used to run solid flat-tappet cams. Dwayne recommended a COMP RX roller, a moderately aggressive endurance lobe which he's said has been very successful for his customers looking for decent valve train life when running a solid roller. Since mine is a limited-use dual-purpose application, we didn't want to go w/ a "spring killer". As measured in my block w/ .800"-wheel lifters: @ .020" - 300 @ .050" - 266 @ .100" - 233 @ .200" - 184 @ .300" - 134 @ .400" - 68 Lobe lift -- .434" Net measured lift after lash w/ 600# open spring loads: ~.655" LSA -------- 108 installed on 104 ICL Lash ------- .018" hot Other valve train stuff: - B.A.M. "Pro Series" roller lifters running in bronze-bushed lifter bores w/ oil-feed holes - Smith Bros. adjusting screws & 3/8" x .120"-wall pushrods - Hughes Engines rocker arms - RAS rocker shafts - PAC 1243 springs w/ 240#s at 1.90" installed height, ~ 600#s open - Pro Gear double-roller timing set w/ 9-position crank gear IV. Induction Carb... See my other post w/ the options being considered for testing. Intake... It was originally going to be a modified Edelbrock Victor 440 with the same plenum mods as I've done before w/ good results, but I ended up w/ a Trick Flow intake to try out - The Trick Flow isn't 100% out-of-the-box, but the work I did to it was only some basic plenum & runner casting cleanup (not even port matched), and making sure any spacers wouldn't have a ledge sticking out from the carb mounting pad interfering w/ the fuel/air mix outta the carb - I've got various 1/2" and 1" spacers (open, "Super Sucker") to try out, even though I may not be able to use a 1"-tall spacer as installed in the car V. Exhaust On the dyno, Hooker 2" Super Comps w/ 3.5" x 18" collector extensions FWIW, on the car, TTI 2" with an X-pipe about 20" after the collectors and a full 3" exhaust system thru tailpipes to the back bumper. My TTIs don't fit Dwayne's dyno setup, and Hooker 2" Super Comps don't fit an E-body w/ an RB & heads with raised exhaust ports (at least not w/o significant mods). VI. Misc "stuff" Well... that's everything I can pull up for background info for this post. Oh, the rules: (Rules???) 1. Ya' gotta give both the peak HP and torque, AND the peak RPMs for each... just to make it a little more interesting. 2. Give one set of #s for the baseline carb as described in the other post, and one set for whatever you think "the best" of the other carbs tested makes.
NO, I don't know what that carb will be at this point, so it's up to you to think about what you see as potential improvements -- if any -- from the different carbs listed in the other thread. VII. "Winners!" 1. The person who gets the closest using the baseline carb and a 1/2" open spacer (since I know that size spacer will fit in the car) 2. The person who gets the closest using "the best" carb TBD (that's "To Be Determined" for anyone not familiar w/ the term) and whatever spacer works best with it Prize? => Uhhhh.... maybe I can find a cool t-shirt or something to send to the two folks who get closest. Maybe a gift certificate to a commonly-used parts supplier? Seriously, I do want to give something here to "incentive-ize" the challenge... Oh, the restrictions: (Restrictions???) 1. If I blow it up on the dyno before getting a full set of GOOD data, ya' get NOTHING... except the opportunity to listen to me complain about blowing up my sh!t after all these years waiting to get it back together. 2. Ummmm... yeah, that's the only one that comes to mind at the moment If everything goes according to plan, I'll have my data by late Saturday, but won't likely be able to post it up until either late Sunday after getting home, or possibly not until Monday.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389486
10/18/17 08:27 PM
10/18/17 08:27 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,861 Pattison Texas
CSK
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,861
Pattison Texas
|
base line carb 656 hp @ 6500 , 609 tq @ 5000
best carb 678 hp @ 6600, 617 tq @ 5000
1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI 512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim 2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: CSK]
#2389556
10/18/17 10:15 PM
10/18/17 10:15 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
BL 665@6800. TQ 580@5200 Best 681@6800 TQ 595@5200
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389570
10/18/17 10:44 PM
10/18/17 10:44 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243 Charlotte, North Carolina
sgcuda
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
Base HP 675@6100 TQ 600@5150 Best HP 700@6300 TQ 615@5200
So far, I hope I win, for your sake. P.S. Don't blow up.
[image][/image]
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389646
10/19/17 12:33 AM
10/19/17 12:33 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201 PA
Scully
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
|
SuperFlow 901(?), but I don't remember if Dwayne said the software package has been upgraded since when I was there 10++ years ago.
To get a sense for how "happy" it is or isn't, the old version of this same engine made about 610 HP and pushed my 3750# car & driver to mid 10s at 126 MPH in full street trim. The track is close to sea level, so the #s do reflect that. If that was through mufflers,the 610 number is probably pretty close. I have a 901 but the dyno cell isn't finished yet. I want to accurately calibrate it and get the engine from my race car on it so I can have some reference factors for the engines I build.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389658
10/19/17 12:50 AM
10/19/17 12:50 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544 Syracuse,NY
CompWedgeEngines
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,544
Syracuse,NY
|
Just don't let Dwayne reach under the console.....
RIP Monte Smith
Your work is a reflection of yourself, autograph it with quality.
WD for Diamond Pistons,Sidewinder cylinder heads, Wiseco, K1 rods and cranks,BAM lifters, Morel lifters, Molnar Technologies, Harland Sharp, Pro Gear, Cometic, King Engine Bearings and many others.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: Scully]
#2389720
10/19/17 09:01 AM
10/19/17 09:01 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
SuperFlow 901(?), but I don't remember if Dwayne said the software package has been upgraded since when I was there 10++ years ago.
To get a sense for how "happy" it is or isn't, the old version of this same engine made about 610 HP and pushed my 3750# car & driver to mid 10s at 126 MPH in full street trim. The track is close to sea level, so the #s do reflect that. If that was through mufflers,the 610 number is probably pretty close... Yep: 610 HP & 570 torque on the dyno with open headers and my mechanical water pump; full 3" TTI x-pipe system to the rear bumper thru Dynomax Ultraflows, plus ailternator drag... I figured about a 4% loss as installed in the car.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389727
10/19/17 09:25 AM
10/19/17 09:25 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051 The Great White North
RAMM
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
|
646 hp @ 6300 rpm 596 tq @ 5000 rpm with baseline carb
651 hp @ 6300 rpm 599 tq @ 5000 rpm with better carb
Your 3.5" collectors are large for the app that's why the conservative TQ #'s. Assuming water temp and air temp are "normal" and not super cool. Good luck this should be interesting. J.Rob
2009 PHR\EMC Competitor 2010 PHR\EMC Competitor 2011 PHR\EMC Competitor 2012 PHR\EMC Competitor 2013 PHR\EMC Competitor 2014 HotRod/EMC Competitor 2015 HotRod/EMC NoShow 2016 HotRod/EMC 3rd place SPEC Bigblock 2018 HotRod/EMC 7th place G3
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389744
10/19/17 11:19 AM
10/19/17 11:19 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 277 MN
Willie68coronet
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 277
MN
|
630 hp and 570 tq as baseline 660 hp @ 6700, 588 tq @ 5100 with.. carb 5 after reading Mark W reply lol. Good luck! I'm looking forward to the results.
I know what slow progress is like. I almost got my 446 together after 11 years ofsaving and hoarding
'68 Coronet 500 w/ Indy EZ-1 headed 446, 727 trans, 9" rear First day at the track with SUV street tires and no traction: 1.688 60', 7.24 @ 101.79 in the 1/8 mile
Great customer service from: DominicThumper Carbs, B3 racing engines, Porter Racing Engines, A-1 torque converter's, Quick Performance, Racer Brown Cams, R&R Performance, Manton pushrods
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389766
10/19/17 12:03 PM
10/19/17 12:03 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,162 CT
GTX MATT
master
|
master
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,162
CT
|
639 HP @ 6400 and 589 ft lbs @ 4900 baseline
657 HP @ 6400 and 599 ft lbs @ 5000 with the best carb
Now I need to pin those needles, got to feel that heat Hear my motor screamin while I'm tearin up the street
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389793
10/19/17 12:59 PM
10/19/17 12:59 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266 Renton Washington
Triple Threat
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,266
Renton Washington
|
BASE 669@6750 TQ 590@5250 BEST 689@6850 TQ 600@5250
-Dustin 67 Dart, 9 second, 392" G3 Hemi 68 Barracuda 340 F/SA
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: Triple Threat]
#2389798
10/19/17 01:07 PM
10/19/17 01:07 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317 State of confusion
Thumperdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
|
Not good at this but I'll say;
640 hp and 650 tq but sure would love to see a comparison w/an adapter and Dommy just for giggles...........
72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389825
10/19/17 02:02 PM
10/19/17 02:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
A few tid bits..... Water temp will be in the 160's for all the testing. Weather is supposed to be pretty nice this weekend, so air temps would be mid-60's/70's. The dyno exhaust isn't really "open". There are 5" pipes coming off the collectors going through the wall, where they attach to tractor trailer mufflers. Testing will be done at a 300rpm/sec rate. Provided everything is still going smoothly at the end of the session, we'll take the "best" carb/spacer combo and make a cold water "bonzai" pull to try for "the big number"....... But we won't use that run for "scoring" How low I can get the water temp will depend on how many runs we have made up to that point, and what the temp of the water in the storage tank has gotten up to......... But I'd expect to be able to get it down into the 110-120deg range. The cooler temp is usually worth something...... But not always. I think it would be on this motor though.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2389841
10/19/17 02:32 PM
10/19/17 02:32 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201 PA
Scully
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 201
PA
|
A few tid bits..... Water temp will be in the 160's for all the testing. Weather is supposed to be pretty nice this weekend, so air temps would be mid-60's/70's. The dyno exhaust isn't really "open". There are 5" pipes coming off the collectors going through the wall, where they attach to tractor trailer mufflers. Testing will be done at a 300rpm/sec rate. Provided everything is still going smoothly at the end of the session, we'll take the "best" carb/spacer combo and make a cold water "bonzai" pull to try for "the big number"....... But we won't use that run for "scoring" How low I can get the water temp will depend on how many runs we have made up to that point, and what the temp of the water in the storage tank has gotten up to......... But I'd expect to be as to get it down into the 110-120deg range. The cooler temp is usually worth something...... But not always. I think it would be on this motor though. How many gallons is the water tank.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2389885
10/19/17 04:32 PM
10/19/17 04:32 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,646 Ontario,Canada
firefighter3931
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,646
Ontario,Canada
|
Good luck ! A Day at the PRH dyno cell is loads of fun and a real learning experience. Baseline WAG ; 645hp@6900/605tq@5200 Best pull : 658hp@7100/617tq@5400
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2390000
10/19/17 08:17 PM
10/19/17 08:17 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Lots of good guesses so far........ And a pretty big spread from high to low, so I'm sure someone will be pretty close.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: jwb123]
#2390235
10/20/17 11:28 AM
10/20/17 11:28 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 714 Central TEXAS!!!!
sr4440
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 714
Central TEXAS!!!!
|
for the fun I like your baseline carb Demon RS next pick would be the Holley ultra hp/xp
688hp 652 torque on the demon baseline carb
705hp 667 torque on the Holley ultra
you mentioned 93 octane fuel my engine program shows that it needs more octane, at least 105
And if you have time it shows that it might like the cam installed heads up at 108, instead of advanced to 104.
The ramp rate the dyno guy pulls the engine at will affect the HP numbers as well. I used 600rpm per second ramp rate for the pull. FYI if he is using the latest version of windyn, it has an inertia correction factor, if set right, the sweep rate will not mater, 600 rpm vs 300 rpm vs step will lay right over the top of each other. Explanation: the inertia correction factor is used to correct for the loss of torque as you accelerate the engine internals and related dyno equipment that is connected to the crankshaft. Without this correction you will get different torque reading @ each sweep rate. Joe
Without Data, you’re just another guy with an opinion.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: sr4440]
#2390300
10/20/17 02:29 PM
10/20/17 02:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486 SoCal
Brian Hafliger
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,486
SoCal
|
680Hp@ 6700 and 610Tq@ 5500 base carb. 695Hp@ 6800 and 615Tq@ 5700 best carb.
Brian Hafliger
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: Brian Hafliger]
#2390975
10/21/17 09:40 PM
10/21/17 09:40 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051 The Great White North
RAMM
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
|
680Hp@ 6700 and 610Tq@ 5500 base carb. 695Hp@ 6800 and 615Tq@ 5700 best carb. Peak torque cannot and will not occur at that RPM with the engine specs listed. If it does-dyno is screwy. J.Rob
2009 PHR\EMC Competitor 2010 PHR\EMC Competitor 2011 PHR\EMC Competitor 2012 PHR\EMC Competitor 2013 PHR\EMC Competitor 2014 HotRod/EMC Competitor 2015 HotRod/EMC NoShow 2016 HotRod/EMC 3rd place SPEC Bigblock 2018 HotRod/EMC 7th place G3
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391303
10/22/17 04:11 PM
10/22/17 04:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
The big dyno day was yesterday. I told Brad I wouldn't post up any numbers.......but I can say the motor ran well, and we made I think it was 28 pulls without any "incidents".
I'll also reveal that we tried the "cold water" pulls with two different carbs and got nothing out of that either time. The cooler temps thickened up the oil enough(8-10psi higher oil pressure) to offset any gains from having the heads and intake cooler......so it was a wash. In hindsight, I probably should have tried a run with "lowered" water temps, instead of the relatively cold temps I tried it at(105-110).
He's driving back home today........so I'd think there should be some results posted tonight.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391327
10/22/17 04:54 PM
10/22/17 04:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
I had a really mild 505 on the dyno last week.......the cold water test on that was a 14tq/8hp gain.
I've seen it change the numbers on a 700-800HP BBC by about 25hp.
Just depends on what it is.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391399
10/22/17 07:42 PM
10/22/17 07:42 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
QFT 1.52 downleg, 38*, 2" Super Sucker - 684.2 at 6800, 606.2 at 5000 - the "Big Number Run" although I would not be able to use a 2" spacer with an air cleaner, even with my raised T/A scoop
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391420
10/22/17 08:27 PM
10/22/17 08:27 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,861 Pattison Texas
CSK
master
|
master
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,861
Pattison Texas
|
I am very surprised it liked 38* timing.
1968 Charger COLD A/C Hilborn EFI 512ci 9.7 compression, Stealth heads, 4.10 gear A518 ODtrans 4100lb,10.93 full street car trim 2020 T/A 392 Stock 11.79 @ 114.5
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391423
10/22/17 08:36 PM
10/22/17 08:36 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
We ended up putting 5 different carbs on the motor, and all were briefly tested for part throttle operation. At a variety of low loads(35-80-ish hp), at a variety of rpm's(2200-3200), looking at A/F ratios being displayed from the flow turbines and a Daytona Sensors wide band showed that none of the 5 had what either of us considered "acceptable" part throttle operation...... with the best of them being in the low-12's, and some in the 11.0-11.2 range. They worked perfectly well to use on a "race car", but wouldn't be the hot ticket on the street(in their current configuration).
I can't believe I'm going to say this........but........this is an example of a good argument for EFI.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: Clanton]
#2391430
10/22/17 08:49 PM
10/22/17 08:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Can you post a couple tq# from 3k rpm?THX! The pulls were started at 3500. Once we started to get it dialed in, the tq at 3500 was a little over 500. Things didn't really start to happen until it was closer to 4K.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391444
10/22/17 09:11 PM
10/22/17 09:11 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051 The Great White North
RAMM
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
|
You did better than I thought on HP but I was fairly close on my TQ guess. IFR and PVCR circuits are always too big it seems for part throttle operation. Good job Brad and Dwayne and thankyou for sharing this. Brad your big block is going to feel like a supersized small block with this power and RPM. J.Rob
2009 PHR\EMC Competitor 2010 PHR\EMC Competitor 2011 PHR\EMC Competitor 2012 PHR\EMC Competitor 2013 PHR\EMC Competitor 2014 HotRod/EMC Competitor 2015 HotRod/EMC NoShow 2016 HotRod/EMC 3rd place SPEC Bigblock 2018 HotRod/EMC 7th place G3
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: CSK]
#2391454
10/22/17 09:42 PM
10/22/17 09:42 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,464 Sydney,Australia
tex013
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,464
Sydney,Australia
|
I am very surprised it liked 38* timing. my 440 liked the same 38/39. my 505 is 35 iirc a function of efficiency Well done Brad and Dwayne , good to see the results Tex
Last edited by tex013; 10/22/17 09:43 PM.
New best ET 10.259@129.65 . New best MPH 130.32 Finally fitted a solid cam, stepped it up a bit more 3690lbs through the mufflers New World block 3780lbs 10.278@130.80 . Wowser 10.253@130.24 footbraking from 1500rpm Power by Tex's Automotive
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2391480
10/22/17 10:22 PM
10/22/17 10:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,041 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,041
Oregon
|
We ended up putting 5 different carbs on the motor, and all were briefly tested for part throttle operation. At a variety of low loads(35-80-ish hp), at a variety of rpm's(2200-3200), looking at A/F ratios being displayed from the flow turbines and a Daytona Sensors wide band showed that none of the 5 had what either of us considered "acceptable" part throttle operation...... with the best of them being in the low-12's, and some in the 11.0-11.2 range. They worked perfectly well to use on a "race car", but wouldn't be the hot ticket on the street(in their current configuration).
I can't believe I'm going to say this........but........this is an example of a good argument for EFI. Yep, Holley carbs are almost always rich in the mid-range. On the dyno you can crutch it by turning the idle screws in since you don't usually need the idle circuit on the dyno. On a street car it needs to be sorted out. On the dyno we typically use the idle screws to get the mid-range cleaned up and then use the main jets for WOT. It takes way too much time to mess with the PVCRs during testing. Besides, it all changes once the engine goes in the car so no reason to mess with the carb twice. And I agree with your EFI comment. Once you start tuning EFI engines you'll wonder why people waste their time with carbs!
Last edited by AndyF; 10/22/17 10:23 PM.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2391484
10/22/17 10:25 PM
10/22/17 10:25 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243 Charlotte, North Carolina
sgcuda
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,243
Charlotte, North Carolina
|
At a variety of low loads(35-80-ish hp), at a variety of rpm's(2200-3200), looking at A/F ratios being displayed from the flow turbines and a Daytona Sensors wide band showed that none of the 5 had what either of us considered "acceptable" part throttle operation...... with the best of them being in the low-12's, and some in the 11.0-11.2 range. They worked perfectly well to use on a "race car", but wouldn't be the hot ticket on the street(in their current configuration).
I can't believe I'm going to say this........but........this is an example of a good argument for EFI.
Why do you say that? Just because nobody had time to fix a part throttle lean issue? An EFI system with a lean part throttle concern is still going to need calibration also. 5 minutes booting up a laptop or 5 minutes changing a bleed. I had someone drive over their laptop on a test day. Guess how much data we got that day?
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: tex013]
#2391489
10/22/17 10:31 PM
10/22/17 10:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Still about 2 hours out from home & Mike's driving again.
Miscellaneous comments...
I wasn't expecting it to want that much ignition advance. My Stage VIs' sweet spot was 35, which is why we started out about there. But we weren't seeing the results until bumping it up; 36 was better than 34, but 38 was better yet.
The Race Demon fuel curve made no sense given what I'd seen before. We went from .026 MABs to .028, but it wasn't much change. At that point we yanked it off and started testing other carbs.
Things that ended up NOT like I'd expected: - More torque by about 20 #s... and the peak RPM wasn't really any different than where it was for the old combination
- Harder to get "big" HP numbers, and I'd been HOPING we might be closer to 700, although Dwayne & I agreed it "should" make 670+ before it was tested
- Peak HP RPM... thought it would be around 6500... didn't think the small CSA heads and moderate cam would keep pulling that high
- NONE of the carbs were really "right", even after some tweaking
- The 1.52 downleg needed WAY more jet than I thought it should; we also appear to have maxed out fuel flow capacity of the metering blocks used, since adding more secondary jet stopped much in secondary fuel flow increases before we got to the 98s
- Enough of the carb stuff I saw didn't make sense to me that I ended up stealing Quick Fuel's tune (as much as I knew, at least) for the 1.59 v annular rather than use what I'd intended
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: sgcuda]
#2391496
10/22/17 10:39 PM
10/22/17 10:39 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
At a variety of low loads(35-80-ish hp), at a variety of rpm's(2200-3200), looking at A/F ratios being displayed from the flow turbines and a Daytona Sensors wide band showed that none of the 5 had what either of us considered "acceptable" part throttle operation...... with the best of them being in the low-12's, and some in the 11.0-11.2 range. They worked perfectly well to use on a "race car", but wouldn't be the hot ticket on the street(in their current configuration).
I can't believe I'm going to say this........but........this is an example of a good argument for EFI.
Why do you say that? Just because nobody had time to fix a part throttle lean issue? An EFI system with a lean part throttle concern is still going to need calibration also. 5 minutes booting up a laptop or 5 minutes changing a bleed. I had someone drive over their laptop on a test day. Guess how much data we got that day? The part-throttle was rich on all of them, not lean, and really out of normal range in at least one case. It was a loooong day. Met Dwayne a the dyno at 8:00 AM, last pull was close to 7:30 PM. Then time to break it all down, etc.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391509
10/22/17 10:53 PM
10/22/17 10:53 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
What did i win?
Stopping in Hazleton for some Senapes Pitza would have been a nice prize
Last edited by sixpackgut; 10/22/17 10:57 PM.
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391516
10/22/17 11:01 PM
10/22/17 11:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
The part-throttle was rich on all of them, not lean, and really out of normal range in at least one case. And not just a little rich either........some were way way rich with light loads simulating highway driving. Under those conditions, the main circuit is already flowing plenty of fuel,........and you're not going to lean out the mixture by 3.5 points by tweaking an air bleed. All the carbs had a tendency to richen up throughout the run(both the turbines and O2 agreed).......some worse than others. - Enough of the carb stuff I saw didn't make sense to me that I ended up stealing Quick Fuel's tune (as much as I knew, at least) for the 1.59 v annular rather than use what I'd intended And, as I recall, it seemed to have the flattest fuel curve.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2391520
10/22/17 11:08 PM
10/22/17 11:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094 central texas
krautrock
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094
central texas
|
The part-throttle was rich on all of them, not lean, and really out of normal range in at least one case. And not just a little rich either........some were way way rich with light loads simulating highway driving. Under those conditions, the main circuit is already flowing plenty of fuel,........and you're not going to lean out the mixture by 3.5 points by tweaking an air bleed. All the carbs had a tendency to richen up throughout the run(both the turbines and O2 agreed).......some worse than others. this might be why some of the carb tuners talk about all the newer bodies such as QFT and the variants need transfer slot restrictors in the bodies?
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391521
10/22/17 11:10 PM
10/22/17 11:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
I'm sure that would help with the part throttle.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2391524
10/22/17 11:15 PM
10/22/17 11:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
I'm sure that would help with the part throttle. Dude! Still about 30 minutes from home... at least we're in the right state now.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2391540
10/22/17 11:56 PM
10/22/17 11:56 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
The part-throttle was rich on all of them, not lean, and really out of normal range in at least one case. And not just a little rich either........some were way way rich with light loads simulating highway driving. Under those conditions, the main circuit is already flowing plenty of fuel,........and you're not going to lean out the mixture by 3.5 points by tweaking an air bleed. All the carbs had a tendency to richen up throughout the run(both the turbines and O2 agreed).......some worse than others. - Enough of the carb stuff I saw didn't make sense to me that I ended up stealing Quick Fuel's tune (as much as I knew, at least) for the 1.59 v annular rather than use what I'd intended And, as I recall, it seemed to have the flattest fuel curve. Do you think if you had the time to sort it out, you could have made some emulsion changes to clean up the middle?
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391556
10/23/17 12:31 AM
10/23/17 12:31 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Keep in mind the wot a/f ratios were fairly decent on both the QFT carbs when they made their best runs. So, whatever you do to lean out the part throttle cruise, you're trying to do something that changes that part of the carbs operation by around 3 points......and have essentially zero affect on wot operation.
There are smarter guys with carbs than me, but I have a feeling it's easier said than done.
The QFT 1.52 carb had the least offensive part throttle cruise operation when it was first bolted on.......low/mid-12's, with the 80/90 jets. However, with that set up, the motor didn't take a load real well, and I aborted the run about 800rpm into it when I saw the a/f ratios weren't getting out of the 15's.
Once the jetting was increased to get the wot a/f ratios in line, and the power up......which ended up being 88/98....... then the part throttle cruise was down at the bottom of the 11's.
The Demon had the next best part throttle operation, low-12's, and had the best throttle response. IMO, this carb is probably the best candidate of what we ran to be tweaked to get decent part throttle operation for street use. The down side of this carb as we ran it was, it had the biggest change in wot a/f operation from the bottom of the run to the top........it really richened up at the top end.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: davenc]
#2391591
10/23/17 02:08 AM
10/23/17 02:08 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Brad,
Thanks for sharing your results. How much HP did you gain with each 2* of timing? Did you only test the baseline carb at 34* timing? I wondering how close the baseline carb would have been with 38* timing and the 1" spacer, and whether your original carb is the best solution for a street car? Re timing... - One comparison between 34 and 38 using the same carb & spacer picked up 15 HP and almost 8 lbs-feet at their respective peaks. - Going from 34 to 36 on a different carb & spacer combination picked up 13+ HP, but only about 1.5 lbs-feet; from 36 to 38 didn't pick up any HP (actually lost 2 at peak), but the engine got into the 670s 100 RPM sooner & stayed above 670 for 100 RPM later, and picked up 3.5 lbs-feet. - No, never tried the Race Demon with the Super Sucker and more ignition advance. I'll need to spend more time on it when the car is running again to see what it does.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2391647
10/23/17 09:58 AM
10/23/17 09:58 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,314 Prospect, PA
BSB67
master
|
master
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,314
Prospect, PA
|
The part-throttle was rich on all of them, not lean, and really out of normal range in at least one case. And not just a little rich either........some were way way rich with light loads simulating highway driving. Under those conditions, the main circuit is already flowing plenty of fuel,........and you're not going to lean out the mixture by 3.5 points by tweaking an air bleed. All the carbs had a tendency to richen up throughout the run(both the turbines and O2 agreed).......some worse than others. - Enough of the carb stuff I saw didn't make sense to me that I ended up stealing Quick Fuel's tune (as much as I knew, at least) for the 1.59 v annular rather than use what I'd intended And, as I recall, it seemed to have the flattest fuel curve. Thanks BH/DP for posting. This (WOT fuel curve, cruise) mirrors my past results. Did you look at the boosters at cruise RPM and the A/R befor the booster started flowing? Mine was fat before they were flowing and not flowing much at the lower RPM. The IFR did matter. My testing was in the 2000 to 2500 range. Do you believe that if you did track testing under similar conditions, and based on et and mph, you would have come up with the same hierarchy? Do you believe that cruise numbers in the 12s will truly cruise poorly on the street. Finally,based on what an O2 sensor is really measuring, and how low the fuel flow/air flow measurements are (relative to their span) how robust do you thing the cruise A/F numbers are? Thanks
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391665
10/23/17 10:41 AM
10/23/17 10:41 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 714 Central TEXAS!!!!
sr4440
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 714
Central TEXAS!!!!
|
Since this is a street car, were you running a PCV valve? Then tend to lean out the low to mid-range without having much affect up top.
Joe
Without Data, you’re just another guy with an opinion.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391735
10/23/17 12:32 PM
10/23/17 12:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Russ, on the carbs where the part throttle cruise was in the low 12's, the motor was running smoothly enough where I don't think it would drive bad at all.
I've had quite a few years and plenty of examples to look at, and when they come off the dyno like this, and get put right into the car without getting the part throttle a/f ratios into a more favorable range....... The trend does seem to suggest that the instrumentation isn't lying. Those motors end up getting abnormally poor fuel mileage, plugs that are always dark, and sometimes even gassy smelling oil.
I had a really mild 505 on the dyno about a week ago. It had a Holley 850vs on it. Jets 80/88, part throttle operation very crisp and clean in the low-14's, WOT in the 12's & 13's. No tendancy to get "fat" at any throttle or load setting. That carb was a good match for that motor.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391751
10/23/17 12:58 PM
10/23/17 12:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,846 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,846
S.E. Michigan
|
Good reading. Thanks for sharing your work!
I actually came here wanting to talk about carbs a bit, but after reading this, it seems it might be a bad time to ask questions
Last edited by ZIPPY; 10/23/17 12:58 PM. Reason: really bad typing
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391765
10/23/17 01:20 PM
10/23/17 01:20 PM
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210 robin hood country
deaks
master
|
master
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,210
robin hood country
|
I would be very pleased with those hp figures on a stock stroke motor with that comp, that would put my 3200# car solidly into the 9's The timing aspect suprised me as well. Mick
69 Dart GTS 440 mopar .590 cam, Edelbrock heads, 3200# best et 6.45, 106.78, 10.14, 132.88 mph, 1.47 60ft best 60ft 1.36
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2391797
10/23/17 02:10 PM
10/23/17 02:10 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317 State of confusion
Thumperdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
|
I'm sure that would help with the part throttle. Did you guys mess w/the emulsion cos you can change the mixture quite easily in the range needed buy the location and sizes.........
Last edited by Thumperdart; 10/23/17 02:14 PM.
72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: Thumperdart]
#2391823
10/23/17 02:58 PM
10/23/17 02:58 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457 Washington
madscientist
master
|
master
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,457
Washington
|
I'm sure that would help with the part throttle. Did you guys mess w/the emulsion cos you can change the mixture quite easily in the range needed buy the location and sizes......... That's what I was getting at. My thinking was adding some bleed in a middle hole, or if there was already a bleed there, open it up a bit. Am I thinking on the correct lines?
Just because you think it won't make it true. Horsepower is KING. To dispute this is stupid. C. Alston
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391841
10/23/17 03:10 PM
10/23/17 03:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,006 Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
gregsdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,006
Frostbitefalls MN (Rocky&Bullw...
|
Congrats on a great build Brad. It will "haul the mail" as they would say back in the day What will your car weigh when ready? We have a little time for "guess your ET" !
8..603 156 mph best, 2905 lbs 549, indy 572-13, alky
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: madscientist]
#2391858
10/23/17 03:27 PM
10/23/17 03:27 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317 State of confusion
Thumperdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
|
I'm sure that would help with the part throttle. Did you guys mess w/the emulsion cos you can change the mixture quite easily in the range needed buy the location and sizes......... That's what I was getting at. My thinking was adding some bleed in a middle hole, or if there was already a bleed there, open it up a bit. Am I thinking on the correct lines? Exactly what I've done on the street w/interesting results and yes, adding bigger or smaller not necessarily more changes things pretty quickly and so do the hi-speed bleeds............The richness imo has a LOT to do w/a healthy bigish motor sucking through small venturi's/boosters makin em go rich and I see it all the time on my car and if they put a real carb on that beast(1050 dommy of course) that will change guaranteed..........
72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391861
10/23/17 03:30 PM
10/23/17 03:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,365 Marion, South Carolina [><]
an8sec70cuda
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 13,365
Marion, South Carolina [><]
|
Nice job! HP is about where I expected it to be. Makes more torque than I thought it would though.
CHIP '70 hemicuda, 575" Hemi, 727, Dana 60 '69 road runner, 440-6, 18 spline 4 speed, Dana 60 '71 Demon, 340, low gear 904, 8.75 '73 Chrysler New Yorker, 440, 727, 8.75 '90 Chevy 454SS Silverado, 476" BBC, TH400, 14 bolt '06 GMC 2500HD LBZ Duramax
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391870
10/23/17 03:49 PM
10/23/17 03:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094 central texas
krautrock
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,094
central texas
|
Went back to look at the list of carbs. Did 6A make it on the motor? Figure that carb might've had a little calmer emulsion than some of the others.
1. BG Race Demon RS set up w/ 1.42" venturi sleeves => previous tune as used on my car when it ran 10.5s as driven to the track
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So... that means you can pick two (2) of the remaining carbs listed.
2. BG Gold Claw set up w/ 1.50" venturi sleeves => new & untested config => pushing the limit for venturi size w/ downleg boosters that I believe will work well on my car
3. QFT/Proform 1.45" venturi main body used as basis for complete carb => original boosters; new & untested => Basically a Proform "950" with a better tune
4. QFT/Proform 1.52" venturi main body used as basis for complete carb => BLP modified boosters; new & untested; this is the limit for venturi size w/ downleg boosters I'll try => comparable to a QFT Race-Q 1000, which Quick Fuel used to win the small-block class in the last BLP Carb Challenge held a few years ago
5. QFT/Proform 1.59" venturi annular booster main body used as basis for complete carb => original boosters; new & untested => comparable to a QFT Race-Q 1050-AN, which AndyF said has been the best performing 4150 carb he's tested so far
6a. Holley Ultra HP/XP 1.60" venturi carb re-fitted with Mark Whitener's custom annular boosters => purchased from AndyF 'cuz I thought it looked "interesting" => Dominic "Thumper Carbs" worked on the tune to make it more driveable vs its original dyno tune
6b. Same as #6a, only with Holley Ultra HP/XP 1.56" venturi main body blended out to 1.58" and equipped with the same 12-hole annular boosters as the #5 carb => new & untested config => Mark Whitener's flow testing of a variety of carbs showed the modified Ultra HP/XP 1.56" (1.58") venturi main body flowed noticeably better than Holley's 1.60" venturi body... so I decided to build one
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: krautrock]
#2391895
10/23/17 04:41 PM
10/23/17 04:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Went back to look at the list of carbs.
Did 6A make it on the motor? Figure that carb might've had a little calmer emulsion than some of the others. We did run 6A... briefly. It was not a "happy" carb and didn't even make one full pull before we yanked it off and tried a different carb.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: Thumperdart]
#2391900
10/23/17 04:47 PM
10/23/17 04:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
I'm sure that would help with the part throttle. Did you guys mess w/the emulsion cos you can change the mixture quite easily in the range needed buy the location and sizes......... Not enough time to "go deep" on any one carb with multiple items on the test checklist. I'm going to take a s.w.a.g. that a day on the dyno spent on tuning ONE carb is probably enough to get a basic carb sorted out, if the original tune isn't close.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391906
10/23/17 04:54 PM
10/23/17 04:54 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317 State of confusion
Thumperdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
|
Went back to look at the list of carbs.
Did 6A make it on the motor? Figure that carb might've had a little calmer emulsion than some of the others. We did run 6A... briefly. It was not a "happy" carb and didn't even make one full pull before we yanked it off and tried a different carb. That thing had issues for me also but it went into the 12's-13's on my car then I figured you'd sort it out from there but apparently Andy's testing showed it to be good also......... IF you would of spent more time on one as stated, the end results could of been better and ironed out.........good stuff and info guys........
72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391908
10/23/17 04:55 PM
10/23/17 04:55 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
I'm going to take a s.w.a.g. that a day on the dyno spent on tuning ONE carb is probably enough to get a basic carb sorted out, if the original tune isn't close. And sometimes....... Even after a full day...... You might still not get there if what it really needs from the start is a booster change, and you don't have the pieces on hand to perform that operation.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2391915
10/23/17 05:06 PM
10/23/17 05:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Went back to look at the list of carbs.
Did 6A make it on the motor? Figure that carb might've had a little calmer emulsion than some of the others. We did run 6A... briefly. It was not a "happy" carb and didn't even make one full pull before we yanked it off and tried a different carb. In hindsight, we probably should have stuffed the 88/99 jets in it and made a pull with it, just to "get a number".
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2391959
10/23/17 06:20 PM
10/23/17 06:20 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317 State of confusion
Thumperdart
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 19,317
State of confusion
|
Went back to look at the list of carbs.
Did 6A make it on the motor? Figure that carb might've had a little calmer emulsion than some of the others. We did run 6A... briefly. It was not a "happy" carb and didn't even make one full pull before we yanked it off and tried a different carb. In hindsight, we probably should have stuffed the 88/99 jets in it and made a pull with it, just to "get a number". Agreed although a bit "outta the park" but the old adage of give it what it wants apply's a LOT when testing..........
72 Dart 470 n/a BB stroker street car `THUMPER`...Check me out on FB Dominic Thumper for videos and lots of carb pics......760-900-3895.....
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: sr4440]
#2391997
10/23/17 07:32 PM
10/23/17 07:32 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Since this is a street car, were you running a PCV valve? Then tend to lean out the low to mid-range without having much affect up top.
No PCV. Unless I have some type of separator to ensure oil doesn't get sucked back into the induction system, I won't be using one, either. Oil in combustion chamber = Bad JuJu
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2392042
10/23/17 09:38 PM
10/23/17 09:38 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
My scoring methodology is to add the differences in estimated HP and torque from the actual results for each category. If there is a tie, then the same approach based upon RPM differences would be the deciding factors.
Winners: - Baseline test - RAMM - Best test - 572B1
FWIW, 572B1 was also 2nd in Baseline, and Triple Threat was 2nd in Best with a score only 1 point behind 572B1!
If you notice Triple Threat copies me and than super tunes
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2392045
10/23/17 09:45 PM
10/23/17 09:45 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225 Charleston
sixpackgut
Drag Week Mod Champion
|
Drag Week Mod Champion
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,225
Charleston
|
Keep in mind the wot a/f ratios were fairly decent on both the QFT carbs when they made their best runs. So, whatever you do to lean out the part throttle cruise, you're trying to do something that changes that part of the carbs operation by around 3 points......and have essentially zero affect on wot operation.
There are smarter guys with carbs than me, but I have a feeling it's easier said than done.
The QFT 1.52 carb had the least offensive part throttle cruise operation when it was first bolted on.......low/mid-12's, with the 80/90 jets. However, with that set up, the motor didn't take a load real well, and I aborted the run about 800rpm into it when I saw the a/f ratios weren't getting out of the 15's.
Once the jetting was increased to get the wot a/f ratios in line, and the power up......which ended up being 88/98....... then the part throttle cruise was down at the bottom of the 11's.
The Demon had the next best part throttle operation, low-12's, and had the best throttle response. IMO, this carb is probably the best candidate of what we ran to be tweaked to get decent part throttle operation for street use. The down side of this carb as we ran it was, it had the biggest change in wot a/f operation from the bottom of the run to the top........it really richened up at the top end. How about going as big as possible on the pvcr? That is what I always do. But Im an idiot but it seems to work
Gen 3 power 6.22@110, 9.85@135 Follow @g3hemiswap on instagram
performance only racing, CRT, ultimate converter, superior design concepts, ThumperCarbs
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: sixpackgut]
#2392214
10/24/17 09:32 AM
10/24/17 09:32 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
How about going as big as possible on the pvcr? That is what I always do. But Im an idiot but it seems to work
Yeah, that'll be something I expect to try.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: davenc]
#2392216
10/24/17 09:37 AM
10/24/17 09:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
... I know you go for every last bit, but are you going to even notice the difference of 10HP on a 700HP motor?!!!
For me, the Demon is the clear winner, and the best choice to spend time fine tuning. 10 HP will definitely show up on the ET slip. For me, there was no clear winner... but IMO one of the carbs tested isn't worth putting much -- maybe any -- effort into.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2392296
10/24/17 12:46 PM
10/24/17 12:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
I feel if the fuel curve on the Demon could be sorted out, it would have made within a few hp of the others...... As they were. It had the biggest spread in A/F ratio within a pull. Going from memory, it had areas near the bottom where it was in the 14's, and ended up in the 11's at the top.
I'm fairly certain there is 5-10hp left on the table if you could really get one of the annular carb combos dialed right in.
I base that off the last few pulls we made, in which we tried my dyno mule HP950, which was within a couple tq/hp of the others. I have A/B'd that carb quite a few times against my old CFS built annular 850, and the CFS carb is usually worth 5hp+ over the my 950. In all fairness though, while the CFS carb does make good power, it also would not have been any better at part throttle than the QFT carbs. It's pretty rich on the bottom.
The dyno mule HP950 is something I built from a bare Holley body and old style HP metering blocks. I used Braswell stepped boosters in it, and it has a tendency to slightly richen up from bottom to top. Trying this carb on this motor for me was sort of a "control" test, to guage if the characteristic we were seeing of all the carbs richening up was something peculiar to the combo, or just what the carbs were doing. If anything, on Brads motor, I'd say the dyno 950's tendency to richen up was slightly less than what is typical with it.
Also, I've run that carb on many motors and its never shown a problem being lean before, so again..... As a control item...... If it would have required a bunch of jet put in it, it would point the finger at a combo specific issue, not so much a carb issue. The A/F ratio was mid/hi-12's for most of the pull, and richened up to low 12's at the end.....with the std jetting I had in it.
The motor itself didn't appear to present any out of the ordinary challenge for fuel delivery to the carbs...... The ones that required really big jets to get the wot A/F ratios right are just configured in a way where that was the case. My dyno mule 950 was flowing plenty of fuel with only 75/84 jets(primary pv).
The motor was using about 20cfm more air at the top end of the pull with the bigger carbs....... So there is some power to be gained if the metering is really sorted out.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2392329
10/24/17 01:54 PM
10/24/17 01:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
I feel if the fuel curve on the Demon could be sorted out, it would have made within a few hp of the others... Yeah, something in the current tune w/ the Race Demon (which basically duplicated what my Gold Claw last used on the car) is just... wrong. The previous dyno tests w/ the Gold Claw using a different emulsion config started & ended in a normal A-F range, but had a prominent lean swing in the mid-range. I thought the basic changes I made would have simply flattened out the curve, not make it go progressively richer as the RPM increased. IIRC, (don't have my notes on hand), with both carbs set up w/ 1.42" venturi sleeves, .026 & 70 air bleeds, 80 pri & 90 sec jets, .035 IFRs, and the same .160" ID downleg boosters, the difference was the original Gold Claw emulsion stack was .031"/blank/.031"/blank/.031", whereas I set up the Race Demon with .028"/blank/blank/.028"/blank (more of a traditional Holley DP configuration). Regardless, the two tunes ran waaay differently re air-fuel curves than I would guessed. I'm fairly certain there is 5-10hp left on the table if you could really get one of the annular carb combos dialed right in. That's what I'm hoping, but am in wait-and-see mode until the car's back on the track. One thing I did notice was the run w/ the QF 1.59 annular using the 32 MABs actually made more power across the RPM range, even though it went rich at the very end, than the subsequent runs where we leaned out the MABs. That original QF 1.59 annular pull made more power across most of the RPM range than the QF 1.52 downleg did w/ the 88/98 tune, too. That 1.52 tune is quite a bit richer than I'd expected because the QFT RQ-1000 tune out-of-the-box has 82 & 88 jets and a much leaner .035 MAB. Those BLP .450" ID x .155" leg boosters worked REALLY differently than I anticipated. I thought w/ their improved booster signal that they'd want less jet, not more. FWIW. I checked last night and verified the QFT RQ-1050-AN tune w/ THEIR metering blocks starts at 33 & 73 air bleeds, 84 pri & 90 sec jets, and .035 IFRs. I'm not 100% sure about their emulsion stack -- although I think whatever they don't plug gets .029" or .031" e-jets -- or their PVCRs size. I put mine together using Holley Ultra XP .160" angle channel metering blocks with 32 & 73 bleeds, 84 & 92 jets, .035 IFRs (lowered), an emulsion stack of .0305"/blank/.0305"/blank/blank, and .059" PVCRs. ALL of my carbs have room to mess w/ their tunes.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2392911
10/25/17 02:36 PM
10/25/17 02:36 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
FWIW, I plan in the next couple of days to post a "before" pull from my old combination and an "after" pull from the new one to see where & how much it picked up. Here's one: - Stg VI SFT A = Stage VIs w/ 266 at .050 x .600" on 108 SFT with ported Victor (no spacer, since it wouldn't fit under the old hood) and my Gold Claw carb set up with the 1.42" venturi sleeves - Victor SR A = PRH Victors w/ 266 x .050 x .650" on 108 Solid Roller w/ mildy modified Trick Flow intake, 1" Super Sucker spacer, and the QFT 1.52 v downleg carb I've got the raw #s, but thought the graph presented better. The thing that most stands out -- for me, at least -- is this wasn't simply a gain on the top end. It pretty much gained everywhere across the test RPM range.
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2393718
10/27/17 10:16 AM
10/27/17 10:16 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890 Spahn Ranch
RMCHRGR
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
Spahn Ranch
|
Can I ask what the BSFC numbers look like?
'71 Duster '17 Ram 1500
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2393785
10/27/17 12:46 PM
10/27/17 12:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
On the sheet I'm looking at, they start out in the very low .4's, and start creeping upward into the mid-4's at around 5800rpm, then into the upper-4's at 6800 till the end of the pull(7200).
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: BradH]
#2393789
10/27/17 12:54 PM
10/27/17 12:54 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
One thing I did notice was the run w/ the QF 1.59 annular using the 32 MABs actually made more power across the RPM range, even though it went rich at the very end, than the subsequent runs where we leaned out the MABs. In hindsight, I think a jet change might have been a better move than an air bleed change.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: All the specs to start your dyno #s guesses! 8^)
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#2393863
10/27/17 04:01 PM
10/27/17 04:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
|
OP
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
One thing I did notice was the run w/ the QF 1.59 annular using the 32 MABs actually made more power across the RPM range, even though it went rich at the very end, than the subsequent runs where we leaned out the MABs. In hindsight, I think a jet change might have been a better move than an air bleed change. Yeah... but we were out of time... and I was about out of $$$. We did what we could in the amount of time we had. Still learned a lot, just a few more take-aways to follow up on than I probably expected.
|
|
|
|
|