Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Solid Flat Tappet Differences #936216
02/24/11 09:00 AM
02/24/11 09:00 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
C
Cuda_Mike Offline OP
super stock
Cuda_Mike  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
I received my new cam and lifters yesterday, RB engine, the lifter on the right is what came with it. I've never used any like these, what's the point of the reduced o.d.? 87 grams, 122 grams and 100 grams respectively.

6493543-lifters002.jpg (455 downloads)
Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Cuda_Mike] #936217
02/24/11 09:12 AM
02/24/11 09:12 AM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 162
Greentown Indiana
M
moparmxz Offline
member
moparmxz  Offline
member
M

Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 162
Greentown Indiana
Hey Mike what brand are those,they look like slant six lifters to me.


Randy Brough 1967 440 Dart S/P 6.37 106mph best eighth 3150 lbs
Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: moparmxz] #936218
02/24/11 09:23 AM
02/24/11 09:23 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
C
Cuda_Mike Offline OP
super stock
Cuda_Mike  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
Randy, I don't remember the name of manufacturer, they came in a Bullet Racing Cams box. The light one on the left is Mopar Perf., the middle one Comp. I was surprised of the difference in weight, and that the full bodied Mopar unit was lighter that the one from Bullet.

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Cuda_Mike] #936219
02/24/11 09:46 AM
02/24/11 09:46 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,093
oberlin, Ohio
Rapid340 Offline
top fuel
Rapid340  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,093
oberlin, Ohio

The MP solid lifter is the lightest two piece (hollow) I have measured.



1971 Factory Appearing Duster 340 11.000 @ 122 mph
Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Rapid340] #936220
02/24/11 10:54 AM
02/24/11 10:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
Yes, the MP lifter is hollow inside. If you remove the clip, then the pushrod seat, you will see the space underneath.

Mike,
Can you make some measurements of the barbell shaped lifter? If you don't have a dial caliper, just to the 1/16" inch would still be informative.

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: 440Jim] #936221
02/24/11 11:18 AM
02/24/11 11:18 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
C
Cuda_Mike Offline OP
super stock
Cuda_Mike  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
Jim, I have a dial caliper and will measure it when I get home, about 5 p.m. Are there any drawbacks to this design?

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Cuda_Mike] #936222
02/24/11 11:28 AM
02/24/11 11:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
B
BradH Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
BradH  Offline
Taking time off to work on my car
B

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
Are you aware that if you use the barbell design w/o bushed lifter bores, you will have NO oil pressure due to excessive oil getting past the cutout in the lifter body?

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: BradH] #936223
02/24/11 11:36 AM
02/24/11 11:36 AM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
C
Cuda_Mike Offline OP
super stock
Cuda_Mike  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
Brad, That is what I was wondering, that's why I asked. Thanks. I guess these need to go back. Thanks.

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Cuda_Mike] #936224
02/24/11 09:22 PM
02/24/11 09:22 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
C
Cuda_Mike Offline OP
super stock
Cuda_Mike  Offline OP
super stock
C

Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 720
Indiana
Jim, Here are the dimensions of the lifter. What's it designed for? Thanks for all replies.

6494601-lifter002.jpg (226 downloads)
Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: BradH] #936225
02/24/11 09:41 PM
02/24/11 09:41 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
Quicksilver440 Offline
I Live Here
Quicksilver440  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
Quote:

Are you aware that if you use the barbell design w/o bushed lifter bores, you will have NO oil pressure due to excessive oil getting past the cutout in the lifter body?




Brad is correct...

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Quicksilver440] #936226
02/24/11 10:36 PM
02/24/11 10:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,285
okla.
sam64 Offline
pro stock
sam64  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,285
okla.
if the top[.590]part doesn't come out of the lifter bore it shouldn't lose pressure,right.

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: sam64] #936227
02/24/11 11:11 PM
02/24/11 11:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
S
Sport440 Offline
master
Sport440  Offline
master
S

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 6,591
Canton, Ohio
If the top part does come out of the hole theres going to be some serious stabilty issues.

The barbell part is at the oil feed, but it will just fill and oil the bore more evenly. I dont see how it will lose all oil psi. Its going to fill and only leak out around the perimeter of the lifters bore. Its not going to Dump into a unpressurized opening.

Personally I dont like that new design. I like the full body better, but I guess the barbell could work just as well. But , your going to have to add the extra grams of excess oil of the filled part of the barbell handle to the overall lifters weight thats going to be pushed around.

The benefits if any is the full 360* lifter bore oiling vs just the regular side bore feed oiling. There may be some more slight oil leakage with loose bores but thats dousing the cam mostly. Maybe a poormans EDM lifter.

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Cuda_Mike] #936228
02/24/11 11:22 PM
02/24/11 11:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,223
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,223
Bend,OR USA
Quote:

Jim, Here are the dimensions of the lifter. What's it designed for? Thanks for all replies.


That looks like a solid lifter designed for a BB Chevy motor using .904( .903 modification on Chevy lifter bores ) lifter sizes


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Cab_Burge] #936229
02/25/11 11:09 AM
02/25/11 11:09 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,489
St. Louis Mo.
10 o to go Offline
"Happy Don"
10 o to go  Offline
"Happy Don"

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,489
St. Louis Mo.
We run mopars also they are lighter and been told 5 thousand under size. Comps are heavy .
But I had a mishap last year with one ,nobody has seen this happen .
We believe the lashcap broke and caused too much lash ,or the hole in lifter made too much lash broke lashcap .
witch came 1st chicken or egg.

Pic of it

6495452-CIMG0096.JPG (225 downloads)
Last edited by 10 o to go; 02/25/11 11:10 AM.

2009 418" build dan smith built new 9.96 131.82 6.23 108 1.30 60 foot best to date 9/15/09 8in 727 430 dana 2860 lb 3040 lb w driver
Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Cuda_Mike] #936230
02/25/11 01:14 PM
02/25/11 01:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
Quote:

Jim, Here are the dimensions of the lifter.


Thanks Mike. I will put that info in my file.

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: 10 o to go] #936231
02/25/11 01:31 PM
02/25/11 01:31 PM
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
Dodgem Offline
master
Dodgem  Offline
master

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,746
Ontario, Canada
I had about 8 mopar performace lifters do that over 3 ton 4 years! I used to carry spares and spare pushrods for road side fixes. then I heard some friends had the same failours with mopar performance lifters. bought Comp Cams lifters and never had another problem???


Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: Cuda_Mike] #936232
02/25/11 01:54 PM
02/25/11 01:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
Mike, for comparison
this is info I have for the Howards EDM face oiling lifters. They are overall slightly taller than the MP lifters, with an oil band that didn't give me any issues with 0.650" lift. Two sources had some variation in the numbers, but FWIW.

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: 440Jim] #936233
02/25/11 01:59 PM
02/25/11 01:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
And this is some other notes I have saved.

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: 440Jim] #936234
02/25/11 02:40 PM
02/25/11 02:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
Here is the best I can ESTIMATE, from this info. You better check if the barbell lifter cut out gets exposed at the bottom of the lifter bore when the cam is on the base circle (zero lift). It looks close. I don't have a dimension for that. The purple lines are approximately what I saw with my Howards lifters and a 0.650" lift cam (0.433 tappet lift).

Re: Solid Flat Tappet Differences [Re: 440Jim] #936235
02/25/11 03:10 PM
02/25/11 03:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
Quicksilver440 Offline
I Live Here
Quicksilver440  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,766
Central Valley, CA.
Jim...it always amazes me how much info you compile.

Page 1 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1