Project "69 Twin TurboCharger"
#825828
10/10/10 12:52 AM
10/10/10 12:52 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66 Reno, NV
Wilde Racing
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Reno, NV
|
Hi guys new guy to this forum. I was turned on to this place by the guys over at DodgeCharger.com, anyway here is what I'm working on.... A retro styled charger with twin turbos, fuel injection, and coil on plug ignition. I have only began the parts buying and mock-up of the engine bay. The intake is a Pro-Flow unit bought from Richard at West Coast cylinder Heads ( http://www.proheads.com/) I'll also be buying my heads, cam and roller lifters form Richard. I also got the 440 from a friend, it is a 74 out of a motor home. I'm glad it is nothing special so it wont bother me when it shoves a rod threw the block. Here is the beautiful intake on the engine. Cleaned it up and painted it, (not sure if it will stay black) and got it in the engine bay for mock up. I have a small dilemma with the down pipe fitting on the drivers side with the brake booster. I think I will opt for a hydro-boost unit and a type II saginaw pump. I have a few other parts gathered but I need to finish the repairs on the torsion bar cross member so I can install the trans for engine mock-up. Let me know what you think. THANKS
|
|
|
Re: Project "69 Twin TurboCharger"
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#825831
10/10/10 11:25 AM
10/10/10 11:25 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068 Irving, TX
feets
Senior Management
|
Senior Management
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
|
Edelbrock stole my idea that I stole from GM. Okay, maybe not. I had mine built 6 years ago with a wee bit more plenum volume.
We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind. - Stu Harmon
|
|
|
Re: Project "69 Twin TurboCharger"
[Re: OzHemi]
#825833
10/10/10 12:55 PM
10/10/10 12:55 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66 Reno, NV
Wilde Racing
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Reno, NV
|
Quote:
That looks expesive! and cool.
Thanks, but I'm just another broke ass mechanic with a family, so this WILL be a budget build...
Quote:
Edelbrock stole my idea that I stole from GM.
Okay, maybe not. I had mine built 6 years ago with a wee bit more plenum volume.
That looks amazing, you got any more pictures of it?
Quote:
Welcome to Moparts... I thought that you might join here too...
Allen "xs29j8Bullitt" on DodgeCharger.Com
Hey, I figured this place might be a bit more helpful for some of the performance aspects of my build... Thanks for the heads up about this place....
Quote:
Nice intake...looks familiar.
(Mine is not a Mopar one though...but same idea )
No yours is not a mopar, but have NO idea how close I came to installing one of those engines in my charger.... I kinda like them...
|
|
|
Re: Project "69 Twin TurboCharger"
[Re: xs29j8]
#825836
10/12/10 12:09 PM
10/12/10 12:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068 Irving, TX
feets
Senior Management
|
Senior Management
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
|
Allen, you never cease to amaze me with the car stuff you've messed with.
We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind. - Stu Harmon
|
|
|
Re: Project "69 Twin TurboCharger"
[Re: feets]
#825837
10/13/10 04:53 AM
10/13/10 04:53 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624 Fort Worth, Texas
xs29j8
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,624
Fort Worth, Texas
|
Quote:
Allen, you never cease to amaze me with the car stuff you've messed with.
Yeah Kevin, I have gone down a lot of roads in the hobby... those roads now being littered with my abandoned projects...
I even recently considered reviving the twin turbo engine as part of my latest secret project... then I saw this project... and the intake But, I am having enough trouble just doing a straight forward restoration of my Charger 500, so it is unlikely I will ever attempt it.
I will be following this project though, as I have followed yours over the years...
|
|
|
Re: Project "69 Twin TurboCharger"
[Re: 1Fast340]
#825839
10/14/10 12:22 PM
10/14/10 12:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66 Reno, NV
Wilde Racing
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Reno, NV
|
Thanks guys, I got some more stuff for the project.. two 38mm Tial gates and a 50 mm "Q" blow off valve. I also started on the floor repairs, sub-frame connectors, and brake booster mod.. I had two panels to repair in the floor. I also had to repair the cross-member. I did a bunch of searching for sub-frame connectors, but didn't find I type I liked. The style that formed to the bottom floor pan looked nice when installed but I was a little worried about their strength, at one point they are only 2 or so inches thick, so I opted to loose a little ground clearance to gain in strength. Cut but still need a few clearance mods... The brake booster/down-pipe issue is hopefully solved with this new beautiful piece of equipment. It is out of a 05 Silverado Duramax, I'll have to do some modifications to the depth of the new hydro pump, more on this later... That's all for now, I have a lot more body/floor pan work before I can mount the trans and get going on the turbos.....
|
|
|
Re: Project "69 Twin TurboCharger"
[Re: Wilde Racing]
#825840
10/14/10 10:47 PM
10/14/10 10:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068 Irving, TX
feets
Senior Management
|
Senior Management
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
|
Quote:
That looks amazing, you got any more pictures of it?
It would have been nice to have a larger engine compartment like your car has.
Here's the right header under construction:
That one was easy. The exhaust went just above the motor mount and straight back. The driver's side, as I'm sure you're well aware, was a bit more complicated.
Everybody here can point out my biggest mistake. The manifolds were larger in diameter than the turbine inlets. That let the exhaust slow down before reaching the turbo. Others will point out the poor angle on the waste gates. That was necessary. I had to keep them under the hood and not block any more access to parts of the engine. The driver's side down pipe disconnected below the steering shaft but above the torsion bars. There was a disconnect in the passenger side pipe just before the bell housing. Typical three bolt header flange style joints were used. They leaked incessantly, possibly due to poor installation.
I never had a problem with the alternator. It showed no signs of heat stress despite being bracketed by exhaust for thousands of miles, including the Dallas to Green Bay and back Power Tour.
We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind. - Stu Harmon
|
|
|
Re: Project "69 Twin TurboCharger"
[Re: Mr.Yuck]
#825842
10/15/10 10:29 AM
10/15/10 10:29 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068 Irving, TX
feets
Senior Management
|
Senior Management
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,068
Irving, TX
|
I have less than 5 inches between the core support and grille. I know the Chargers have more room. The Imperial has even more.
We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind. - Stu Harmon
|
|
|
Re: Project "69 Twin TurboCharger"
[Re: Wilde Racing]
#825845
10/22/10 01:18 PM
10/22/10 01:18 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66 Reno, NV
Wilde Racing
OP
member
|
OP
member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 66
Reno, NV
|
Here is a small update on the charger... Sub-frame connectors welded in, but not finished. I'm going to do a little clean up grinding... Floor tunnel almost done. Man, do I suck at panel replacement. New parts..... A starter that is not the size of a small aircraft carrier, Type II Saginaw steering pump, pulley, and bracket. Lots of fab work is going to be required for the accessorys, and right now I'm searching for a smaller alternator. I'm doing all this to gain room for the turbos... And I got some seats. I had planed on restoring the factroy seats, but then I got this wild hair to find some late model dodge charger seats... While searching I remembered how much I like the late model GTO seat, plus I always wanted some for my truck... SO.... Just need to get the lame "G T O" off them... lol
|
|
|
|
|