|
|
|
Re: Windage Trays...for big blocks
[Re: 340Cuda]
#3099527
12/04/22 02:18 PM
12/04/22 02:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,023
A shed in England
Tig
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,023
A shed in England
|
Interesting results on the link below, I'm guessing the losses will be more for an 8 cylinder / bigger stroke as well. But it doesn't take into consideration the effects of acceleration and deceleration on the oil in the pan. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4403473.pdf
'74 Challenger..9.46 @ 145.9 1/4, 6.001 @ 118 1/8 so far. 4023lb !!! # N/A, Marsh performance 655ci, Indy Maxx, T/R, Indy 600-13 X's, Street legal, pump gas, full interior, Cal-Tracs, mufflers, 3:73's and real 10.5 radials.
9.51 @ 142.4 1/4, 6.003 @ 114 1/8 with our old mule KB, 572-13, 580 wedge.
RHD '68 Barracuda Fastback 323ci street/strip. Best ET 13.88 @ 99.03
|
|
|
Re: Windage Trays...for big blocks
[Re: dvw]
#3101740
12/12/22 08:42 PM
12/12/22 08:42 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 218
Illinois
gearhead01
enthusiast
|
enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 218
Illinois
|
Yea, I seen several also.
When I asked about pans for a big block Mopar, all i get was a blank stare, and the old "no, we don't"
John
1971 Satellite Sebring Plus - 14.46 @ 95.43
1977 Road Runner - N/B 11.02@ 119 Drag Radials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
, I have heard from a very good engine builder in SO CA that the crankshaft scrapers they used on BB Chevy were worth no HP or torque improvement below 6000 RPM at WOT dyno testing, they made 30 HP gain at 8600 RPM on the same motor with almost identical weather conditions the next day after installing it 
