Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: R3DART] #2269051
03/14/17 12:27 AM
03/14/17 12:27 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 205
Edmonton Alberta, Canada
R
R3DART Offline OP
enthusiast
R3DART  Offline OP
enthusiast
R

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 205
Edmonton Alberta, Canada
Thanks for the input on this fella's!
Looks like it makes sense to move forward with it.

Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: R3DART] #2269170
03/14/17 06:08 AM
03/14/17 06:08 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
Ian Offline
super stock
Ian  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
not sure if you will see gains with the t/r was the indy ported ,i think if you port a 772 and converted to yours it will make more power or a sheet metal the rp s move some air 360 cfm just my 2 cents.


1.37 60 ft [email]6.0@113[/email] [email]9.57@141[/email] 408 glide 3550lbs
new video http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Xvq3ZObywQE
Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: R3DART] #2269272
03/14/17 12:44 PM
03/14/17 12:44 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 103
Kansas, Topeka
6
69 lawndart Offline
member
69 lawndart  Offline
member
6

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 103
Kansas, Topeka
Les I have the same combination with W9's and a TR with two 1000 CFM throttle bodies. It really picked up when I changed from one 1250 CFM Throttle body to two 1000. Feed the animal.

Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: 69 lawndart] #2269347
03/14/17 02:27 PM
03/14/17 02:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,784
PA
W5DART66 Offline
top fuel
W5DART66  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,784
PA
Be hard to get cross section you will need.

Shoot for 4.250-4.500" in the Plenum (It will be paper thin and Or need weld at that point)

Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: 69 lawndart] #2269541
03/14/17 07:52 PM
03/14/17 07:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
Ian Offline
super stock
Ian  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
Originally Posted By 69 lawndart
Les I have the same combination with W9's and a TR with two 1000 CFM throttle bodies. It really picked up when I changed from one 1250 CFM Throttle body to two 1000. Feed the animal.

what tunnel ram are you running ? and what et/mph did it change


1.37 60 ft [email]6.0@113[/email] [email]9.57@141[/email] 408 glide 3550lbs
new video http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Xvq3ZObywQE
Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: Ian] #2269804
03/15/17 03:12 AM
03/15/17 03:12 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 205
Edmonton Alberta, Canada
R
R3DART Offline OP
enthusiast
R3DART  Offline OP
enthusiast
R

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 205
Edmonton Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted By Ian
not sure if you will see gains with the t/r was the indy ported ,i think if you port a 772 and converted to yours it will make more power or a sheet metal the rp s move some air 360 cfm just my 2 cents.

Ian, my intake is not ported.
After a discussion I had with Brett a while back, I was planning on getting rid of my 4150 to 4500 adapter and opening it up for the dominator.
But every time I walk into my garage I see that pro dominator tunnel ram sitting there. Seems a shame not to use it if can be made to work well.

Last edited by R3DART; 03/15/17 03:14 AM.
Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: 69 lawndart] #2269807
03/15/17 03:16 AM
03/15/17 03:16 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 205
Edmonton Alberta, Canada
R
R3DART Offline OP
enthusiast
R3DART  Offline OP
enthusiast
R

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 205
Edmonton Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted By 69 lawndart
Les I have the same combination with W9's and a TR with two 1000 CFM throttle bodies. It really picked up when I changed from one 1250 CFM Throttle body to two 1000. Feed the animal.

Lawndart, is yours a sheet metal TR ?

Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: R3DART] #2269843
03/15/17 09:40 AM
03/15/17 09:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
Ian Offline
super stock
Ian  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
twins look better lol this is a indy i converted to dom

WP_20160422_003.jpg
Last edited by Ian; 03/15/17 09:44 AM.

1.37 60 ft [email]6.0@113[/email] [email]9.57@141[/email] 408 glide 3550lbs
new video http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Xvq3ZObywQE
Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: R3DART] #2269896
03/15/17 11:47 AM
03/15/17 11:47 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 103
Kansas, Topeka
6
69 lawndart Offline
member
69 lawndart  Offline
member
6

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 103
Kansas, Topeka
Yes sir it is, It's a Hogan manifold. I bought from a guy that sold his heads and a cast intake.

IMAG1853.jpg
Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: Ian] #2269897
03/15/17 11:48 AM
03/15/17 11:48 AM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 103
Kansas, Topeka
6
69 lawndart Offline
member
69 lawndart  Offline
member
6

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 103
Kansas, Topeka
That's a nice looking cast intake.

Last edited by 69 lawndart; 03/15/17 11:49 AM.
Re: 468 ci sb- Single plane vs Tunnel ram [Re: 69 lawndart] #2270154
03/15/17 08:00 PM
03/15/17 08:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
Ian Offline
super stock
Ian  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,044
Victoria, Australia
Originally Posted By 69 lawndart
That's a nice looking cast intake.

thank you .nice set up you have ,just keep a eye on your fan have seen a few brake or fly apart ,your hogan intake is way better than any holley t/r .R3DART but i think with some port work the holley may get close to the indy unported and a ported one will give you around 25 hp more,if you are chasing hp then there is only one way to go .up to you my friend


1.37 60 ft [email]6.0@113[/email] [email]9.57@141[/email] 408 glide 3550lbs
new video http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Xvq3ZObywQE
Page 2 of 2 1 2






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1