Re: 1962 1963 cross ram
[Re: 69 plymouth rnr]
#1584791
02/27/14 12:58 AM
02/27/14 12:58 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,547 Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
Rhinodart
Rhinotruck
|
Rhinotruck
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 43,547
Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy
|
Don't know a lot about them but was just offered this one last week.
The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it.
JB Rhinehart, Realist
A-Body's RULE!
|
|
|
Re: 1962 1963 cross ram
[Re: Rhinodart]
#1584794
02/27/14 03:11 AM
02/27/14 03:11 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678 Fresno, CA
Jim_Lusk
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
|
Quote:
Don't know a lot about them but was just offered this one last week.
Did you take it?
|
|
|
Re: 1962 1963 cross ram
[Re: Cab_Burge]
#1584797
02/27/14 09:28 AM
02/27/14 09:28 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,008 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,008
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Don't know a lot about them but was just offered this one last week.
That looks like a 1963 with the primarys enlarged to the 1964 sizes Some of the erly 1964 look liked the 1963 also so you need to look at the casting numbers and dates to verify which one it is and when it was cast
Click on the picture link and look at the carb flange to the rear , you can see that the primaries are smaller than the secondaries.
|
|
|
Re: 1962 1963 cross ram
[Re: JohnRR]
#1584798
02/27/14 01:42 PM
02/27/14 01:42 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160 Texas
dannysbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
|
A few things I have picked up. 1. 413 and stage 1 426 intakes have the smaller primaries. 2. Stage 11 intakes have the larger primaries to accept the 3705 carburetors. 3. The stage 111 intake has the larger primaries and where the plenum box intersects with the crossover it does it with a slope or 45* angle rather than the 90* angle of the earlier intakes. 4. Carbs that were installed on the factory cars did not have the numbers stamped. The stamped carbs are over the counter. The 3447 have smaller primaries. 3705 primaries and secondaries are the same size.
Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.
|
|
|
Re: 1962 1963 cross ram
[Re: dannysbee]
#1584802
02/27/14 05:09 PM
02/27/14 05:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA
62maxwgn
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436
Blair County,PA
|
Quote:
A few things I have picked up. 1. 413 and stage 1 426 intakes have the smaller primaries. 2. Stage 11 intakes have the larger primaries to accept the 3705 carburetors. 3. The stage 111 intake has the larger primaries and where the plenum box intersects with the crossover it does it with a slope or 45* angle rather than the 90* angle of the earlier intakes. 4. Carbs that were installed on the factory cars did not have the numbers stamped. The stamped carbs are over the counter. The 3447 have smaller primaries. 3705 primaries and secondaries are the same size.
Danny,I have to disagree with you on the carb number stampings at least the 3447.My 3447's are original O.E.M. installed,stamped and dated C1 and C3.Any O.E.M. 3705 I have had were not.
|
|
|
Re: 1962 1963 cross ram
[Re: 62maxwgn]
#1584803
02/28/14 03:38 AM
02/28/14 03:38 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160 Texas
dannysbee
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 5,160
Texas
|
Bill most of my experience has been with the 3705's. My no part number information came from Joe Smith. That along with the fact that I have never seen an auto supply carburetor without a part number formed my opinion. You could very well be right.
Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.
|
|
|
Re: 1962 1963 cross ram
[Re: 62maxwgn]
#1584807
02/28/14 10:33 PM
02/28/14 10:33 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,231 State of retirement
52savoy
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,231
State of retirement
|
Quote:
Quote:
A few things I have picked up. 1. 413 and stage 1 426 intakes have the smaller primaries. 2. Stage 11 intakes have the larger primaries to accept the 3705 carburetors. 3. The stage 111 intake has the larger primaries and where the plenum box intersects with the crossover it does it with a slope or 45* angle rather than the 90* angle of the earlier intakes. 4. Carbs that were installed on the factory cars did not have the numbers stamped. The stamped carbs are over the counter. The 3447 have smaller primaries. 3705 primaries and secondaries are the same size.
Danny,I have to disagree with you on the carb number stampings at least the 3447.My 3447's are original O.E.M. installed,stamped and dated C1 and C3.Any O.E.M. 3705 I have had were not.
I wanted to disagree too but afraid of starting a dispute. The '63 max wedge I had, came with stamped carbs too.
|
|
|
Re: 1962 1963 cross ram
[Re: 52savoy]
#1584809
03/01/14 12:53 AM
03/01/14 12:53 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA
62maxwgn
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,436
Blair County,PA
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
A few things I have picked up. 1. 413 and stage 1 426 intakes have the smaller primaries. 2. Stage 11 intakes have the larger primaries to accept the 3705 carburetors. 3. The stage 111 intake has the larger primaries and where the plenum box intersects with the crossover it does it with a slope or 45* angle rather than the 90* angle of the earlier intakes. 4. Carbs that were installed on the factory cars did not have the numbers stamped. The stamped carbs are over the counter. The 3447 have smaller primaries. 3705 primaries and secondaries are the same size.
Danny,I have to disagree with you on the carb number stampings at least the 3447.My 3447's are original O.E.M. installed,stamped and dated C1 and C3.Any O.E.M. 3705 I have had were not.
I wanted to disagree too but afraid of starting a dispute. The '63 max wedge I had, came with stamped carbs too.
If it was built before June of 63 it would have had stamped 3447's.
|
|
|
|
|