1962 1963 cross ram - Moparts Forums

Register Log In Moparts Forums Moparts Question and Answer 1962 1963 cross ram

Print Thread

1962 1963 cross ram #1584790 02/27/14 12:49 AM 02/27/14 12:49 AM
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA 6 69 plymouth rnr OP member
69 plymouth rnr OP member 6 Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA	Looking for info on max wedge cross ram 62 -63 413-426 . Also the carbs have no numbers on them ?? Thanks Nick

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 69 plymouth rnr] #1584791 02/27/14 12:58 AM 02/27/14 12:58 AM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 43,517 Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy Rhinodart Rhinotruck
Rhinodart Rhinotruck Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 43,517 Round Lake Beach, Illinoisy	Don't know a lot about them but was just offered this one last week. 8054332-IMG_20140207_155959303.jpg (131 downloads) The funny thing about science is that if you change one miniscule parameter you change the entire outcome to the way you want it. JB Rhinehart, Realist A-Body's RULE!

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 69 plymouth rnr] #1584792 02/27/14 01:38 AM 02/27/14 01:38 AM
Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,824 MI, usa dvw master
dvw master Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 9,824 MI, usa	Early carbs 3447, late 3705 Doug

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 69 plymouth rnr] #1584793 02/27/14 02:36 AM 02/27/14 02:36 AM
Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA C Cab_Burge I Win
Cab_Burge I Win C Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA	Quote: Looking for info on max wedge cross ram 62 -63 413-426 . Also the carbs have no numbers on them ?? Thanks Nick The 1962 and 1963 M.W. intakes and carbs. use the same part numbers and casting numbers regardless of the H.P. ratings. The 1964 carbs., intakes and camshafts are bigger than the earlier ones and have different part numbers and casting numbers also Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: Rhinodart] #1584794 02/27/14 03:11 AM 02/27/14 03:11 AM
Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 18,678 Fresno, CA Jim_Lusk I Live Here
Jim_Lusk I Live Here Joined: Mar 2003 Posts: 18,678 Fresno, CA	Quote: Don't know a lot about them but was just offered this one last week. Did you take it?

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 69 plymouth rnr] #1584795 02/27/14 04:20 AM 02/27/14 04:20 AM
Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 243 Helsinki, Finland A Anselmi enthusiast
Anselmi enthusiast A Joined: Apr 2003 Posts: 243 Helsinki, Finland	Don't know what you are looking for, but... http://racehemi.maxwedge.com/topics/intakes.php http://racehemi.maxwedge.com/topics/carbs.php '66 Plymouth '64 Dodge '63 Plymouth x 3

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: Rhinodart] #1584796 02/27/14 06:12 AM 02/27/14 06:12 AM
Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA C Cab_Burge I Win
Cab_Burge I Win C Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA	Quote: Don't know a lot about them but was just offered this one last week. That looks like a 1963 with the primarys enlarged to the 1964 sizes Some of the erly 1964 look liked the 1963 also so you need to look at the casting numbers and dates to verify which one it is and when it was cast Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: Cab_Burge] #1584797 02/27/14 09:28 AM 02/27/14 09:28 AM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A. JohnRR I Win
JohnRR I Win Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 74,974 U.S.S.A.	Quote: Quote: Don't know a lot about them but was just offered this one last week. That looks like a 1963 with the primarys enlarged to the 1964 sizes Some of the erly 1964 look liked the 1963 also so you need to look at the casting numbers and dates to verify which one it is and when it was cast Click on the picture link and look at the carb flange to the rear , you can see that the primaries are smaller than the secondaries.

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: JohnRR] #1584798 02/27/14 01:42 PM 02/27/14 01:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,160 Texas dannysbee master
dannysbee master Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,160 Texas	A few things I have picked up. 1. 413 and stage 1 426 intakes have the smaller primaries. 2. Stage 11 intakes have the larger primaries to accept the 3705 carburetors. 3. The stage 111 intake has the larger primaries and where the plenum box intersects with the crossover it does it with a slope or 45* angle rather than the 90* angle of the earlier intakes. 4. Carbs that were installed on the factory cars did not have the numbers stamped. The stamped carbs are over the counter. The 3447 have smaller primaries. 3705 primaries and secondaries are the same size. Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: dannysbee] #1584799 02/27/14 04:47 PM 02/27/14 04:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA 6 69 plymouth rnr OP member
69 plymouth rnr OP member 6 Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA	Ok the numbers on the intake state that it is a 63- 64 413-426 I'm ok with that , the carbs have no numbers ?? I'm told they are over the counter ?? Thanks guys !!!!

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 69 plymouth rnr] #1584800 02/27/14 04:59 PM 02/27/14 04:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA C Cab_Burge I Win
Cab_Burge I Win C Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA	There are two different casting numbers, the 1962 and 1963.The 1964 should have a different casting number on it As already stated the very rare 1963 Stage 2 intake where 1963 casting opended up at the factory for the bigger 3705 carbs. Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: Cab_Burge] #1584801 02/27/14 05:09 PM 02/27/14 05:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA 6 69 plymouth rnr OP member
69 plymouth rnr OP member 6 Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA	Ok all I can see is 2402726-1 ?? The carbs at the base where the numbers go , one has a 1 and the other is a 2 That's all ????

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: dannysbee] #1584802 02/27/14 05:09 PM 02/27/14 05:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA 62maxwgn master
62maxwgn master Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA	Quote: A few things I have picked up. 1. 413 and stage 1 426 intakes have the smaller primaries. 2. Stage 11 intakes have the larger primaries to accept the 3705 carburetors. 3. The stage 111 intake has the larger primaries and where the plenum box intersects with the crossover it does it with a slope or 45* angle rather than the 90* angle of the earlier intakes. 4. Carbs that were installed on the factory cars did not have the numbers stamped. The stamped carbs are over the counter. The 3447 have smaller primaries. 3705 primaries and secondaries are the same size. Danny,I have to disagree with you on the carb number stampings at least the 3447.My 3447's are original O.E.M. installed,stamped and dated C1 and C3.Any O.E.M. 3705 I have had were not.

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 62maxwgn] #1584803 02/28/14 03:38 AM 02/28/14 03:38 AM
Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,160 Texas dannysbee master
dannysbee master Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,160 Texas	Bill most of my experience has been with the 3705's. My no part number information came from Joe Smith. That along with the fact that I have never seen an auto supply carburetor without a part number formed my opinion. You could very well be right. Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 69 plymouth rnr] #1584804 02/28/14 05:28 AM 02/28/14 05:28 AM
Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA C Cab_Burge I Win
Cab_Burge I Win C Joined: Aug 2003 Posts: 43,116 Bend,OR USA	Quote: Ok the numbers on the intake state that it is a 63- 64 413-426 I'm ok with that , the carbs have no numbers ?? I'm told they are over the counter ?? Thanks guys !!!! I remember buying some 3705 from JC Whitney for around $27.00 each plus shipping of around $3.00, big money back then. Those carbs. came with metal (aluminum I think )tags, not stamp on the pasenger side front corners like my OEM 3447 where Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: Cab_Burge] #1584805 02/28/14 10:10 PM 02/28/14 10:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA 6 69 plymouth rnr OP member
69 plymouth rnr OP member 6 Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA	Thanks cab !! I have a few pics for you. 8056481-image.jpg (55 downloads)

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: Cab_Burge] #1584806 02/28/14 10:25 PM 02/28/14 10:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA 6 69 plymouth rnr OP member
69 plymouth rnr OP member 6 Joined: Nov 2008 Posts: 85 Washington PA	Thanks cab !! Pics will not load back to drawing board!! Last edited by 69 plymouth rnr; 02/28/14 10:26 PM.

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 62maxwgn] #1584807 02/28/14 10:33 PM 02/28/14 10:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 4,230 State of retirement 5 52savoy master
52savoy master 5 Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 4,230 State of retirement	Quote: Quote: A few things I have picked up. 1. 413 and stage 1 426 intakes have the smaller primaries. 2. Stage 11 intakes have the larger primaries to accept the 3705 carburetors. 3. The stage 111 intake has the larger primaries and where the plenum box intersects with the crossover it does it with a slope or 45* angle rather than the 90* angle of the earlier intakes. 4. Carbs that were installed on the factory cars did not have the numbers stamped. The stamped carbs are over the counter. The 3447 have smaller primaries. 3705 primaries and secondaries are the same size. Danny,I have to disagree with you on the carb number stampings at least the 3447.My 3447's are original O.E.M. installed,stamped and dated C1 and C3.Any O.E.M. 3705 I have had were not. I wanted to disagree too but afraid of starting a dispute. The '63 max wedge I had, came with stamped carbs too.

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 52savoy] #1584808 03/01/14 12:20 AM 03/01/14 12:20 AM
Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,160 Texas dannysbee master
dannysbee master Joined: Nov 2003 Posts: 5,160 Texas	Quote: Quote: Quote: A few things I have picked up. 1. 413 and stage 1 426 intakes have the smaller primaries. 2. Stage 11 intakes have the larger primaries to accept the 3705 carburetors. 3. The stage 111 intake has the larger primaries and where the plenum box intersects with the crossover it does it with a slope or 45* angle rather than the 90* angle of the earlier intakes. 4. Carbs that were installed on the factory cars did not have the numbers stamped. The stamped carbs are over the counter. The 3447 have smaller primaries. 3705 primaries and secondaries are the same size. Danny,I have to disagree with you on the carb number stampings at least the 3447.My 3447's are original O.E.M. installed,stamped and dated C1 and C3.Any O.E.M. 3705 I have had were not. I wanted to disagree too but afraid of starting a dispute. The '63 max wedge I had, came with stamped carbs too. Were they 3705's or 3447's. Did you buy the car new? Getting old just means you were smarter than some and luckier than others.

Re: 1962 1963 cross ram [Re: 52savoy] #1584809 03/01/14 12:53 AM 03/01/14 12:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA 62maxwgn master
62maxwgn master Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 9,436 Blair County,PA	Quote: Quote: Quote: A few things I have picked up. 1. 413 and stage 1 426 intakes have the smaller primaries. 2. Stage 11 intakes have the larger primaries to accept the 3705 carburetors. 3. The stage 111 intake has the larger primaries and where the plenum box intersects with the crossover it does it with a slope or 45* angle rather than the 90* angle of the earlier intakes. 4. Carbs that were installed on the factory cars did not have the numbers stamped. The stamped carbs are over the counter. The 3447 have smaller primaries. 3705 primaries and secondaries are the same size. Danny,I have to disagree with you on the carb number stampings at least the 3447.My 3447's are original O.E.M. installed,stamped and dated C1 and C3.Any O.E.M. 3705 I have had were not. I wanted to disagree too but afraid of starting a dispute. The '63 max wedge I had, came with stamped carbs too. If it was built before June of 63 it would have had stamped 3447's.

Moderated by Al_Alguire, Hotwheelsjr, moparts, not_a_charger, RangerDan440, tboomer

Hop To

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1