Originally Posted By polyspheric
I agree.
All strokers have greater crankcase pressure cycling than stock: larger displacement in the same case volume. No, the pistons going the other way don't eliminate this, and there is also bay-to-bay pumping between adjacent cylinder pairs.

The valley is exposed to crankshaft throw-off. If it were the only source, it can be improved by adding a very tall vertical cylinder and pull from the top. The droplets will fall back and only mist will evacuate, but (duh) there's a space problem. Hint: the cylinder can have bends in it - the height is the important part. A vertical stub added to the valley going immediately to a 90° fitting, the a horizontal leg, 90° again should be able to bypass your manifold.

The valve covers are at least isolated from the crank, but still need to be masked/baffled inside (and in the separator) from flying droplets.

Is your dipstick tube sealed?

For both: a large diameter source (1"+) slows down vapor speed and encourages droplet fall-back.
will make a hole on the left cover frobt side ... i have Moroso fitting with little holes inside ..


1970 Cuda 496 street driven 9.22@150
1971 Demon 572 7.82@176
1957 Desoto Adventurer Convertible 345 Hemi
1958 Plymouth Fury Christine
2008 Dodge Ram 1500 Hemi
1970 Dodge ChallengerRT 6pack 4 speed 1 of 135
1968 Dodge Charger RT 4 speed