that said, it seems the flow #'s from the facebook pic grab could start at .200" lift...
or bench could need calibration, really no telling without more info..
Here are the full curve comparisons...
Larry Smith's posted #s assuming the lowest #s are .100":
.100" - 120
.200" - 177
.300" - 239
.400" - 282
.500" - 312
.600" - 324
Or, assuming the lowest #s are .200" (which I don't believe to be the situation):
.200" - 120
.300" - 177
.400" - 239
.500" - 282
.600" - 312
.700" - 324
MCH's CNC Stealth program advertised #:
.100" - 75.0
.200" - 156.7
.300" - 219.8
.400" - 266.2
.500" - 298.8
.600" - 314.9
.700" - 320.7
I can't add anything more to this topic, and still question the bench calibration or some other condition that's resulting in unrealistic low-lift #s.
Regardless, carry on with your bad self!
