Originally Posted By moparx
doesn't camber keep the contact patch in the turns while caster helps the car go in a straight line ? also, how much cross caster/camber is acceptable ?


Yes, in its static settings they do exactly that. However, camber and caster also have a dynamic side that occurs when the suspension moves through its travel. Higher caster not only produces straight line stability but also increases steering effort ( good for offsetting some of that mopar over-assist in power systems) increases return to center characteristics (so the steering self centers faster), and most importantly creates greater dynamic negative camber gain.

So with 2* positive caster and zero camber, you may get 1/2* of negative camber as the outside tire compresses. However, step up caster to 6* and you may now gain 1.5* of negative camber in the same wheel travel. That is a huge increase in maintaining tread contact while the body rolls around its axis.

This is why in stock form, 1st gen Camaros are such handling turds. They go into positive camber under compression. The exact opposite of what you want for handling. That's yet another reason why there are so many modification to and suspension companies for GM products.



Originally Posted By Sneke_Eyez

.75 Negative Camber
As Much Caster As Possible, but keeping both sides even
0.12 ~1/16" toe in

Sound like a plan that will handle well and keep me satisfied?


Yes, that is a great goal for all around street performance.