"The NASCAR cowl intake system serves two purposes. It gets a little higher pressure air into the engine (poor boy supercharging) and it relieves the pressure at the base of the windshield."
Not sure about the second point being a plus, or more then an opinion or how even much pressure is really "relieved" by engine consumption. This high pressure area might be actually an improvement in streaming the rest of the air over the roof less abruptly, maybe like the the advantage measured of having the tail gate up creating a high pressure area and smoothing air flow in the back of a pick up vs having tailgate down, and very turbulent. And I believe its high pressure because of the rebound of air from striking the front nose of the car at speed, and less so from slope of the windshield, which the latest HR posted link might also indicate
For crying out loud, put down the micrometers and stop questioning everything everyone says.
Air being forced into the engine does relieve the pressure build up at the base of the glass but not to any massive degree at the high speeds NASCAR runs.
Having a high pressure area at the base of the glass is not a good thing for aero. Trucks are different because they are pulling a bathtub behind the highest point of the vehicle and that is where the circulation arises.
1. I am not crying
2. Nobody on this site can here me cry
3. The link if you bothered to read it, discusses aero changes measured in counts, or thousandths, regarding measurement units, your concern is with them, not me.
4. I only question what I disagree with or statements that have little to back them up, will admit, some get bothered by the public scrutiny
5. This latest nascar statement is ether backpedaling from your earlier remarks made or a contradiction by itself, I can't figure out which.
6. Having a high pressure area might be a good thing vs having a low pressure turbulent area, with out data/measurement to support it either way with certainty, is rather presumptuous.
7. Air doesn't care if its a car or a truck
