Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP

Print Thread

Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP [Re: mopar346] #1690055 10/28/14 12:27 AM 10/28/14 12:27 AM
Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 21,845 Kirkland, Washington Pacnorthcuda Too Many Posts
Pacnorthcuda Too Many Posts Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 21,845 Kirkland, Washington	In my opinion yes. I consider 1 quart above to be the max, and the full mark on the dipstick to be the min ("add"). I re-marked my dipstick accordingly.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	69/70 Plymies	10/24/14 08:09 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	dogdays	10/24/14 08:24 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	yellow70charger	10/24/14 09:13 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	6PakBee	10/25/14 12:44 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	Cab_Burge	10/24/14 09:14 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	RapidRobert	10/24/14 09:43 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	69/70 Plymies	10/24/14 10:40 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	RapidRobert	10/24/14 10:52 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	69/70 Plymies	10/24/14 11:09 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	RapidRobert	10/25/14 01:24 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	GTX MATT	10/25/14 01:26 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	ahy	10/25/14 02:25 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	Cab_Burge	10/25/14 04:54 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	69/70 Plymies	10/27/14 04:13 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	RapidRobert	10/27/14 04:35 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	JohnRR	10/27/14 05:05 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	69/70 Plymies	10/27/14 05:31 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	JohnRR	10/27/14 07:00 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	moper	10/28/14 01:51 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	GTX MATT	10/27/14 07:01 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	Cab_Burge	10/27/14 08:36 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	JohnRR	10/27/14 09:13 PM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	RapidRobert	10/28/14 01:37 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	Cab_Burge	10/28/14 03:50 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	Pacnorthcuda	10/28/14 03:58 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	mopar346	10/28/14 04:19 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	Pacnorthcuda	10/28/14 04:27 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	RapidRobert	10/28/14 05:57 AM
Re: Does "must" really mean MUST? Ref: 1970 383HP	DAYCLONA	10/24/14 11:03 PM

Moderated by Al_Alguire, Hotwheelsjr, moparts, not_a_charger, RangerDan440, tboomer

Hop To