|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
[Re: RUNCHARGER]
#1304042
09/16/12 05:49 PM
09/16/12 05:49 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 588
Franklin, TN
23T Hemmee
mopar
|
mopar
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 588
Franklin, TN
|
Quote:
Maybe I reverse engineer stuff. I would set it up with as much stroke as you can get with that particular crank. I would then mock it up before decking and see where it was at. Then I would decide how much to deck it.
Sheldon
BINGO!!! We have a winner..... 
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/15/12 12:43 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
CompWedgeEngines
|
09/15/12 12:49 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
sr4440
|
09/15/12 01:04 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
gregsdart
|
09/15/12 01:36 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/15/12 05:28 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
67_Satellite
|
09/15/12 02:01 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
MR_P_BODY
|
09/15/12 02:56 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/15/12 04:22 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/16/12 04:52 AM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
440Jim
|
09/16/12 03:30 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/16/12 03:57 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/16/12 09:21 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
RUNCHARGER
|
09/16/12 09:42 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
23T Hemmee
|
09/16/12 09:49 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
BSB67
|
09/16/12 10:28 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/16/12 10:31 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/16/12 10:53 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Belvedere1
|
09/17/12 03:14 AM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/17/12 02:59 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/17/12 03:06 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
YYZ
|
09/17/12 03:07 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
JohnRR
|
09/17/12 03:47 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Thumperdart
|
09/17/12 04:05 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
jafr
|
09/15/12 05:19 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Thumperdart
|
09/15/12 04:45 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Cab_Burge
|
09/16/12 04:42 AM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Evil Spirit
|
09/16/12 08:45 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Brian Hafliger
|
09/16/12 09:04 PM
|
|
Re: 383/400 stroker - 3.90, 3.91 or 3.92 crank?
|
Evil Spirit
|
09/17/12 03:48 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
