Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session
[Re: BradH]
#776985
08/19/10 02:29 PM
08/19/10 02:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,037 Oregon
AndyF
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,037
Oregon
|
Quote:
Quote:
Bullet Roller ~272 @ .050, ~.700 lift, 108 LSA
...
Just supposed to be a pump gas street/strip deal, I think with more emphasis on street.
Anybody besides me look at those two statements above and chuckle a bit?
Yep. The 427 inch small block that I just finished up has a 236 @ 050 roller cam in it.
|
|
|
Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session
[Re: 72demon416]
#776988
08/19/10 03:49 PM
08/19/10 03:49 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,019 Finland
mafo
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,019
Finland
|
always nice to read your posts, now can we build a 1000 hp n/a 400 incher ?
-65 Valiant,420", all motor,2700#, dot tires, 8,42 @ 160,2
|
|
|
Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session
[Re: 93reefblue]
#776990
08/19/10 08:11 PM
08/19/10 08:11 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 941 Texas, USA
ChrgrCuda
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 941
Texas, USA
|
Ryan, you did such a good job on my small block Eddy heads, intake and cam that I ordered my Big Block stuff from you instead of the mainstream. I appreciate your candidness and you saved me money by your advice compared to others. I'm really looking forward to my stroker big block's results after you work those heads. But yeah, I agree when it comes to small blocks I think they are just too much fun!
68 Cuda Notchback [Email]10.86@120[/Email]
69 Charger R/T 440/505
2009 Challenger SRT8
|
|
|
Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session
[Re: AndyF]
#776991
08/19/10 08:20 PM
08/19/10 08:20 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,082 St. Paul , Mn.
tubtar
master
|
master
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,082
St. Paul , Mn.
|
Quote:
Yep. The 427 inch small block that I just finished up has a 236 @ 050 roller cam in it.
Typical Freudian undercompensation.
|
|
|
Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session
[Re: RyanJ]
#776996
08/20/10 11:02 AM
08/20/10 11:02 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,846 S.E. Michigan
ZIPPY
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 17,846
S.E. Michigan
|
Good reading, thanks Ryan.
The M1 intakes mostly seem to be designed for a 340.
Rich H.
Esse Quam Videri
|
|
|
Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session
[Re: 72demon416]
#776997
08/20/10 12:19 PM
08/20/10 12:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547 State College, PA
RyanJ
OP
moparts member
|
OP
moparts member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,547
State College, PA
|
Quote:
I'm thinking I might win the award for having the meanest idle @ the ice cream stand though LOL. It's going to sound awesome!!!!!!
It does sounds good.... even though it is low compression, it definitely does not sound like a 340... you know it's a bit more than that when you hear it.
Can't wait to see how those Goodyear Radials hook up LOL.
|
|
|
Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session
[Re: Ian]
#776999
08/20/10 06:15 PM
08/20/10 06:15 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3 north battleford sask
93reefblue
member
|
member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 3
north battleford sask
|
ryan unless i missed it .. what is the expected gains going from the m1 to indy intake. thanks, andy h
Last edited by 93reefblue; 08/20/10 06:40 PM.
|
|
|
|
|