Moparts

440 W5 Dyno Session

Posted By: RyanJ

440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 01:51 AM

Another day another motor....

Basic specs:

R3 Siamese 4.185" bore
4.0" K1 4340 crank, 2.10" journal
Arrow I beam rods
Custom Diamonds ~ 10.6:1 compression.
Milodon 7 Qt pan/Fluidampr
Bullet Roller ~272 @ .050, ~.700 lift, 108 LSA
1.6 Harland Sharps,3/8 Manton pushrods
W5 small chamber heads, ported by??? Who knows, these were used previously ported heads, that we did new VJ & blend on. Actually sold these heads on ebay @ one time. 2.08"/1.60" Ferrea's. Port work is ok, ports not "huge" just decent conservative shape etc.
MP M1 LG runner 4150 flange intake

Ran it with 3 different carbs, a 950HP, & pair of 2 circuit Dominators.

Customer Supplied intake, carb, heads, rockers, oil pan/water pump/damper, block, rods etc. I did'nt have alot of input, just pistons & cam & got to machine it all & make it "work" I sold him the heads/rockers on ebay as I mentioned, they came in shop as a trade in type deal @ one point, they had had some damage, we put some new seats in, repaired a chamber etc, basically got them back to useable condition.

Block was a Mancini Chrysler engineering sale special, I think he got it for like $1500 brand new, was already rough bored to 4.16 or something.

Just supposed to be a pump gas street/strip deal, I think with more emphasis on street.

Anyhow... I got it finished Monday & primed it, noticed it was'nt getting ton of oil to rocker gear, had 25/50 oil in it, figured we'd fire it, & would monitor rockers. Often times with this thick oil you don't get a tremendous flow to top, until it gets some heat in it & things start moving.

Fired it up yesterday on dyno, ran for 1 minute 15 seconds... Pulled covers, had oil to top but not getting enough, not good volume out the adjuster squirter hole in the HS rockers... It had adequate oil to roller wheel, & the bearings etc. 88 PSI oil pressure on the bypass cold...

Had Joe Gibbs assembly grease all over adjusters & cups etc & that stuff just does not go away, IMO it's even better than the CMD # 3 lube Jesel etc supplies for the adjusters, & so I just spritz oiled the adjusters some & ran it another 3 minutes.... Still not good oil to adjusters... Oil temp was stone cold still, so I dumped the 25/50 Pennzoil & put in 10/30 VR1 oil, knowing it was'nt going to do much, but was worth a shot before we tore into motor. Knocked about 10 PSI of pressure out of it, but that's about it.... ran it for 3 more minutes & checked rockers... not good enough to make a pull or put significant load on it.

Started working my way backwards to see where the issue may lie in lack of volume/pressure to rockers... start with hold down & bolt, not there, pulled head stud out, still not getting great oil to the stud? @ that point, thinking maybe Cometic has oil hole in wrong spot or something, so head needs to come off... fun fun. Pulled intake & head...gasket lines up fine with block oil passage & the passage in head. No restrictors hidden in head... I had undercut the ARP head stud that feeds the rocker stand W/ oil, so it was not a restriction in getting oil past it to the rocker stands....

Well... gotta be Cam or cam bearings.....

So off came the front of motor...

I knew I had checked bearing hole alignment, so was about 99.9% sure that was'nt issue unless for some unGodly reason a cam bearing had spun or slightly rotated. But when we checked housing bore size on this particular R3 block before we put cam bearings in, it was shown to actually be right on tight side of Durabond housing bore spec, so it had plenty of crush, so I was'nt really worried about cam bearings...

Slid cam out front & bingo... no oil feed holes or slotting of any kind on the 2/4 journals. Wonderful... I'm thinking the oil feed holes actually get machined in when the core is made although I don't know that for sure, perhaps the final grinder does the oil holes... But it's a Crane core, ground by Bullet, first non roller cam bearing camshaft I've seen with no oil feed holes or slot. Alot of the Bullet stuff is not slotted for full time oiling, it just has a pair of oil feed holes that intersect @ a 90 degree angle. So if you look @ a cam that just has feed holes, if you look @ certain sides/angles of the journal you'd not notice the feed holes. Normally a motor that does not have restrictors in heads, does not need full time slotted oiling, so I usually just run them with the 90 degree holes, especially if it has roller bearing rockers, if it is a bored rocker with ton of spring pressure, then bit more important to have full time oiling to me.

So anyhow, I have to admit I never noticed it was lacking oil feed holes when I pulled it out of box & slid it in motor, have never seen one without them... so one of those things you get complacent & ASSume things are machined correctly.

So, back to the shop I went & threw cam in lathe & added a .200" wide oiling groove ~.180" deep in the 2/4 journal. That was fun, anyone who has ever tried to machine on a camshaft in any way knows how hard a billet roller core is.



So, hit dyno this AM, slid cam in, re-degreed it, heads back on, & all back together, primed good, & fired it before lunch.

Got oil to 150, pulled VC's, checked lash & ready to rock...

Broke it in with a known good 950 Carb. Made quick check out pull, was hair lean, was only @ 28 timing though... Decided to throw some jet in it to be safe & as I'm changing Jets, we hear this noise out in shop that sounded like something exploded & building was on fire or something. Holy crap was it loud & continuous.... We all go running through building to figure out what was going on & make sure everyone was alright & turns out one of the main air lines running across building decided to give up @ a connector & blew apart spewing 175+ PSI Air/water out a 1" PVC pipe all over the walls... that was enough excitement for 1 day.

Ran it with the 950, seated rings, & messed with timing, these small chamber W5's did'nt want much spark lead. 32 was best anything over that was down on power by good bit. I'm not really sold on these small chamber W5's, I'm fairly convinced they do not make as good power/have as good chamber burn (not nearly as good) as a traditional W5 heart shaped single quench pad chamber. This is second set of Small chamber W5's I've dynoed, so have some data to go off of. I don't like looks/shape of chamber & dyno results seem to back that up.

Anyhow... so after the 950 I went to a known good 1050 2 circuit off a Customers low 8 sec W9 motor. It picked up about 10 over the 950... did'nt tune on it, just wanted to see what a known good 4500 would do before I put customers 1050 on, which I had some question marks about. I had tried this carb on another motor a while back & it did'nt work that great, so I went all through it couple days ago in hopes it was something simple. It's just been sitting around for too long... not a good thing on carbs. But anyhow, other than the idle air bleeds being too big, it worked good this time @ WOT & actually picked up about 10+ over the other 1050.. TQ was also up a bit everywhere. Was lean, ended up putting I think 6 jets in it on both sides, air bleeds a little outside stock window. I know who previous owner of this carb was & recall him telling me years ago that he had screwed with air bleeds in it, & the Widebands were showing me he definitely had... Idle bleeds just need knocked down a good bit & high speeds need just couple sizes pulled out to get jetting back down a little.

Anyhow.... @ beginning of day I guessed it would make 660-670 HP, 570 TQ.... Based on previous motors on this dyno, & my knowledge of what the heads were like, intake was like, cam was like & compression was like. I knew compression was little low for the cam (rockers were supposed to be 1.5 & actually were 1.6, Harland Sharp how hard would it be to actually stamp a ratio on your rockers?) I knew I did'nt like the small chamber in the heads, knew intake was way too big in every aspect & would knock bunch of TQ out of it...

Ended up with 658 HP/ 571 TQ.

The funny thing was, I was sitting in console room @ end of day going over #'s & got to thinking, I've only had one other W5 motor on this dyno so far... & it happened to have a LG runner M1 (same intake)... It was 2nd motor we dynoed on this new dyno, Jimi Vignogna built it for guy in NY & he brought it down & had me dyno it for him.... Anyhow, I started thinking... what HP did that thing make? Hmm 658... 2 Drastically different W5 motors, made exact same HP #.

Todays Motor:
440"
10.6:1 pump gas
272 @ .050 cam
Mechanical water pump
No Vacuum pump
Small chamber W5s
MP LG Runner M1 W5 intake

Other Motor:
416"
13:1 race gas
280 @ .050 cam
Electric water pump
Vacuum pump
Std Chamber W5's
MP LG runner M1 W5 intake

I'll post dyno sheets off both motors in a sec, because neat to compare the 2...

Interesting thing is motor today even with alot less compression etc, it actually made little better TQ/ inch than the 416, 1.29 VS 1.27

Thee motors would really wake up with an INDY intake... these LG runner M1 intake motors are both near bottom of barrell of TQ/INCH of motors I've dynoed... Even flat tappet stuff is putting up better TQ/Inch #'s, & it's all laying in that manifold.

Anyhow... I was just glad to get rocker arm oiling sorted out & have a productive day finally & gathered some more data for my mental dyno database of SB combinations...

Next Guinea pig on the pump, maybe end of next week is a 418 with set of RHS LA-X heads on pump gas with mild roller & an INDY 360-3 intake.
I enjoy dabbling in the unusual... there would be nothing exciting about my job to me if I built 440-500" Edelbrock/440-1 head Big Blocks all day... these wacky SB Combo's really keep you guessing, there are just so many different ways to build these things, it really keeps things interesting, even though I'm working on same basic engine platform all the time.

Attached picture 6147038-100_2201.jpg
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 01:53 AM

2

Attached picture 6147044-100_2199.jpg
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 01:54 AM

Dyno #'s off the 440 from Today

Attached picture 6147048-100_2207.jpg
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 01:56 AM

Dyno #'s off the 416 with same LG runner M1 intake

Attached picture 6147052-100_2208.jpg
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 01:57 AM

Pic of the 416 W5

Attached picture 6147055-100_1929COPY.jpg
Posted By: CompWedgeEngines

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 02:04 AM

Are those Schoenfeld dirt headers?

Very interesting comparo.
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 02:13 AM

Todd, yes 1 7/8 to 2" Step W9 Sprint Car header, I have adapter flanges made for just about any head out there to be able to bolt these headers to for dyno use... Obviously I added EGT bungs & 02 bungs in the collectors.
Posted By: DavidDean

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 02:57 AM

Are you going to change to the indy intake or leave the mp large port on it? It would be intresting to see how much it picks up.
Posted By: Bob_Coomer

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 03:33 AM

what a great post Ryan, I always look forward to your threads, they are no bull straight to the point good ole info...
You are a credit to this web site...
Lately some former board members on other boards have been trash talking, saying no good info, or people with knowledge ever post any useful stuff or good tech any more..
well here's your sign guys...LOL
Posted By: fishy340

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 04:57 AM

i think he should be happy w those numbers rj...one question,did u have to change shorts after the connection for the air hose blew? lol j/k, thanks for the post, always great to reading them.
Posted By: mr_340

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 06:16 AM

How did the BSFC numbers compare between the two engines?
Posted By: 72demon416

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 06:29 AM

Well, I have to tip my hat to Ryan, I am extremely pleased with his personal service and professionalism- I'm sure as most people on this board already know he is a major asset to all us small block Mopar guys. Shady Dell has been simply excellent to deal with, I don't think it's very often you'll get your engine builder to reply to your (many)emails when he's at home on the couch trying to relax after working on this crap all day. So..thanks Ryan. (does this advertising campaign earn me any discounts LOL)
I am very pleased with the results...it made 40-60 hp more than I was really expecting given it's shortcomings that I imposed. Yes, it is probably the worst intake for power but I had used it because I am not excited about cutting my hood for carb/air cleaner clearance and the M1 is quite a bit lower than the Indy. We'll see- maybe there will be a Indy on there yet someday...
This is supposed to be a "semi" stock appearing pump gas deal so for not running a mechanical water pump, vac pump, having only moderate compression and a poor intake think it is pretty good results.
Posted By: tvt59

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 07:17 AM

Ryan,
This motor is very simular to mine. But more cam and little less compression. Do you think my heads are better since you did them? Think the numbers for mine will be close to these?
Posted By: jim sciortino

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 01:31 PM

Keep up the good work...

I expect at least one build-up a week!!!
Posted By: JSR1485

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 01:55 PM

Thanks Ryan for all the info helps me alot, This is the reason I am going to you for my new bullet.
Posted By: BradH

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 04:30 PM

Quote:

Bullet Roller ~272 @ .050, ~.700 lift, 108 LSA

...

Just supposed to be a pump gas street/strip deal, I think with more emphasis on street.




Anybody besides me look at those two statements above and chuckle a bit?
Posted By: 1Fast340

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 05:12 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Bullet Roller ~272 @ .050, ~.700 lift, 108 LSA

...

Just supposed to be a pump gas street/strip deal, I think with more emphasis on street.




Anybody besides me look at those two statements above and chuckle a bit?




i gues it may be a pretty mean streetsmallblock but not all that bad,gues we all have diferent ways of thinking of a nice streetmotor also 440cubes obviusly eats up alot of duration very quick


thanks for another good post ryan
Posted By: rt66jim

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 05:35 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Bullet Roller ~272 @ .050, ~.700 lift, 108 LSA

...

Just supposed to be a pump gas street/strip deal, I think with more emphasis on street.




Anybody besides me look at those two statements above and chuckle a bit?


I can say from experience. That my 340 with a 254@.050 528 lift on a 108 CL. Seemed just as radical as my 416 with a 272@.050 619 lift on a 108 CL. Both were streetable if you accept their short comings on drivablity.
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 05:52 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Bullet Roller ~272 @ .050, ~.700 lift, 108 LSA

...

Just supposed to be a pump gas street/strip deal, I think with more emphasis on street.




Anybody besides me look at those two statements above and chuckle a bit?




Just will be hard on springs & rockers. Certainly not something going to go drive across country with though. Everyones definition of "street" is different. Most "street" cars that I do work for, get driven to local car show or cruise in every once in while, hit track maybe 6-10 times a year... see less than 2000 miles/YR total on street. He wanted a motor that was similar to 340Ricks old W5 motor... & that's what he got. About same power & driveability as Rick's old combo.

With valvespring technology these days, big lift cams are no longer a faux pas in a "street" car.
Posted By: BradH

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 06:17 PM

Quote:

With valvespring technology these days, big lift cams are no longer a faux pas in a "street" car.



Works for me... And something to keep in mind for the future, since I'm going roller, too.
Posted By: AndyF

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 06:29 PM

Quote:

Quote:

Bullet Roller ~272 @ .050, ~.700 lift, 108 LSA

...

Just supposed to be a pump gas street/strip deal, I think with more emphasis on street.




Anybody besides me look at those two statements above and chuckle a bit?




Yep. The 427 inch small block that I just finished up has a 236 @ 050 roller cam in it.
Posted By: Moparnut426

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 06:41 PM

My "street" 408 has comps CRSZRR-10 solid roller, and its 248/254 @50, and They wanted me to stick a bigger one in it. I spoke to Ryan, and Brian both, Brian wanted me to have a custom cam with 274 @50 with over 600 lift. Then we talked and I told him this is a street car 85% of the time. We went with this on instead, so This cam would be GNARLEY I would think.

But I sure would like it.

Kasey
Posted By: 72demon416

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 07:19 PM

I'm thinking I might win the award for having the meanest idle @ the ice cream stand though LOL.
It's going to sound awesome!!!!!!
Posted By: mafo

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 07:49 PM

always nice to read your posts,
now can we build a 1000 hp n/a 400 incher ?
Posted By: 93reefblue

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/19/10 08:28 PM



"Just supposed to be a pump gas street/strip deal, I think with more emphasis on street. "

if street means quiet hiway at night(WOT)??!!YUP
Posted By: ChrgrCuda

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 12:11 AM

Ryan, you did such a good job on my small block Eddy heads, intake and cam that I ordered my Big Block stuff from you instead of the mainstream. I appreciate your candidness and you saved me money by your advice compared to others. I'm really looking forward to my stroker big block's results after you work those heads. But yeah, I agree when it comes to small blocks I think they are just too much fun!
Posted By: tubtar

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 12:20 AM

Quote:


Yep. The 427 inch small block that I just finished up has a 236 @ 050 roller cam in it.




Typical Freudian undercompensation.
Posted By: 340_Dart

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 03:47 AM

AndyF, what kind of cylinder pressure does that 427 have with such a small cam?

Rick, that 440 will definately make some rumble under the hood of your demon. Should easily go low 10's at the track, and even in the 9's if you can get it to hook!
What did the current 416 you have in the car do performance wise? ( ET and mph and weight) -Andy
Posted By: emarine01

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 03:53 AM

Good reading material Thankx
Posted By: AndyF

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 04:25 AM

Quote:

AndyF, what kind of cylinder pressure does that 427 have with such a small cam?





I think it was 180 psi. It is a pump gas street motor. A 236 at 50 roller isn't really a small cam for 427 inches. Lots of crate motors use cams that are smaller than that. Chevy puts a 211 at 050 cam in the 502 crate motor for example.

The car that the 427 is in goes 150+ mph so it is making plenty of power. Idles at 800 rpm which is nice.
Posted By: 72demon416

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 04:57 AM

Andy, there is lots of unknowns with my car. I've never weighed it but it's got to be 3400/3500 lbs- I haven't taken ANY weight out so it's got that against it. I never made it to the track before I grenaded it but the night I hurt the motor I was making some passes out on the highway with a freinds passport. Now I know a lot of people don't put a lot of stock in the results of those things but this one was consistantly showing 3 mph slow and ET was within a 10'th of having been tried in a car that does run at the track- so with that in mind my car cars best was 12.1 @ 119.3( & it seems like it's always poor air here for performance). I was having a hell of a time to get it out of the hole without bogging or blowing the tires away- it was like a on/off switch. The track will certainly show something more realistic of it's potential-I would think mid to high tens given it's obescity. Someday I'll get there... but in the meantime it should be a lot of fun to tool around town in
I see youv'e caught the speed bug again with your Dart
Posted By: ZIPPY

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 03:02 PM

Good reading, thanks Ryan.

The M1 intakes mostly seem to be designed for a 340.
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 04:19 PM

Quote:

I'm thinking I might win the award for having the meanest idle @ the ice cream stand though LOL.
It's going to sound awesome!!!!!!




It does sounds good.... even though it is low compression, it definitely does not sound like a 340... you know it's a bit more than that when you hear it.

Can't wait to see how those Goodyear Radials hook up LOL.
Posted By: Ian

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 05:24 PM

hey ryan ,just a bit of topic ,with your turbo motor made good power aspirated mild comp good heads small cam ,have you done many big heads small cam engines with as good results .thanks
Posted By: 93reefblue

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/20/10 10:15 PM

ryan
unless i missed it ..
what is the expected gains going from the m1 to indy intake.
thanks,
andy h
Posted By: RyanJ

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/21/10 01:49 AM

I'm sure it would put at least 30-40 FT lbs in it.

I hav'nt done alot of big head motors with real small cams, that 242 I had in my W9 turbo motor was smallest cam I've ever dynoed.
Posted By: W5Duster436

Re: 440 W5 Dyno Session - 08/21/10 01:51 AM

Quote:

Well, I have to tip my hat to Ryan, I am extremely pleased with his personal service and professionalism- I'm sure as most people on this board already know he is a major asset to all us small block Mopar guys. Shady Dell has been simply excellent to deal with, I don't think it's very often you'll get your engine builder to reply to your (many)emails when he's at home on the couch trying to relax after working on this crap all day. So..thanks Ryan. (does this advertising campaign earn me any discounts LOL)
I am very pleased with the results...it made 40-60 hp more than I was really expecting given it's shortcomings that I imposed. Yes, it is probably the worst intake for power but I had used it because I am not excited about cutting my hood for carb/air cleaner clearance and the M1 is quite a bit lower than the Indy. We'll see- maybe there will be a Indy on there yet someday...
This is supposed to be a "semi" stock appearing pump gas deal so for not running a mechanical water pump, vac pump, having only moderate compression and a poor intake think it is pretty good results.




Awesome report. I think I am the other lucky guy with the small chamber heads but I think mine liked 39 timing.

I hope to get back up there in the spring at least to upgrade mine to your specs.

Ryan, great work as usual!
© 2024 Moparts Forums