Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB #752079
07/19/10 12:42 AM
07/19/10 12:42 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
I'm looking for mainly opinions on this thread, but also the pros and cons of these two setups.

Of course costs is the REALLY big one and which is more simplistic. Seems like you could always take the costs of an EFI system, get a decent carb and put the rest of the money towards other parts of the car.

Any opinions/info is appreciated.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752080
07/19/10 01:15 AM
07/19/10 01:15 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,477
Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY Offline
I Live Here
CrAzYMoPaRGuY  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,477
Canada
Drivability is the big issue as far as I'm concerned.
The cost is the big "con".

A well set up car with a carb or two that actually RUNS WELL would be the best comparison, but many guys who have drivability problems with poor running carb setups will let their enthusiasm wane towards their car because they don't enjoy it like they should.

IMO anyways...

Top end all out power will be very close, maybe some low and midrange torque numbers would lean towards the EFI.

Cold start drivability between the two would be noticeable too IMO.


CrAzYMoPaRGuY
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY] #752081
07/19/10 01:20 AM
07/19/10 01:20 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
I tested a 2 barrel holley projection kit on my sbc 350 that had a decent summit cam and the other aftermarket goodies. The thing was a complete pain in the a** from the start, ran rich, and wouldn't tune well with the analog computer.

It had excellent torque response, but even while tuning it, it would stay rich. I think the biggest issue was it was an open circuit EFI and not a closed circuit with all the sensors and what not.

MPG didn't seem to change at all. If anything I swapped back to my edelbrock carb cause the EFI was putting my MPG into the ground.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752082
07/19/10 01:24 AM
07/19/10 01:24 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,477
Canada
CrAzYMoPaRGuY Offline
I Live Here
CrAzYMoPaRGuY  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,477
Canada
Quote:

I tested a 2 barrel holley projection kit on my sbc 350 that had a decent summit cam and the other aftermarket goodies. The thing was a complete pain in the a** from the start, ran rich, and wouldn't tune well with the analog computer.

It had excellent torque response, but even while tuning it, it would stay rich. I think the biggest issue was it was an open circuit EFI and not a closed circuit with all the sensors and what not.

MPG didn't seem to change at all. If anything I swapped back to my edelbrock carb cause the EFI was putting my MPG into the ground.




A poor EFI setup will dim most of the view of EFI setups too.

I think the latest sequential multiport setups with a good ECU are hard to beat. I'm not a fan of some of the smaller systems, but some guys have made them work...


CrAzYMoPaRGuY
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CrAzYMoPaRGuY] #752083
07/19/10 01:52 AM
07/19/10 01:52 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
I've got a megasquirt, victor efi intake, fuel injectors, pump, etc etc everything needed to put together a MPI system for my 440. But it's been sitting on the shelf for a few years now. Never got around to installing it. I've been seriously considering selling it all and just building a carb. I think I want to spend my time driving the car rather than putting the efi system together. Not that I would come out a million $ ahead, just that doing a carb would be much more doable from a time investment standpoint.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752084
07/19/10 05:06 AM
07/19/10 05:06 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
I just put the EZ-EFI system on my tunnel ram.



on the electrical side there were 2 sensor connections on the car that were not on the throttle body, water temp, and O2.

on the electrical side there was +/- and key power aside from the fuel pump.

I elected to run a new fuel system, including tank mounted pump.

Cost? I didnt have to touch the intake, just unbolt the carbs and replace - but dont just think of the cost of the carbs, you'd have to include the jet kit, air bleeds, accel pump kit, wideband O2 sensor, carb book, and the time to make all the necessary changes several times a second to get a carb anywhere near close to where these suckers run.

I can only speak to the EZ system, as it's the one I picked to go with, I didnt want to design a system ( cheaper) or map out my own fuel and timing curves ( more expensive) I wanted to control my own timing and make some adjustments, but not need a laptop to even get moving, or after a significant change in the engine.


I have about 1000 miles on it after several long car event weekends and my exhaust tips are clean, the smell does not kill you from behind the car, and i am getting better mileage...

I'd seriously consider more of these setups on my other cars.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752085
07/19/10 06:40 AM
07/19/10 06:40 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,422
Warren, MI
71TA Offline
I Live Here
71TA  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 12,422
Warren, MI
That EZ-EFI looks nice.
I was also looking at EFI for my BB but because of the $ I bought a new 830CFM annular, mechanical secondary Speed Demon (with all replaceable jets). Using the LMI A/F meter to properly tune it, it starts better than my modern daily driver. That LMI IS the tool that s required to setup a carb. Reading plugs and other old school methods are JUST that.


www.DetroitMuscleTechnologies.com Mopar body and heater box restoration gaskets
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: 71TA] #752086
07/19/10 07:09 AM
07/19/10 07:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
i have to agree with DJV. i have been in his car with the efi and also another friend that put a single set up on his big block. holy cow, the difference in how smooth they run, the power, and drivabilty is incredible. no doubt you can get a carb close but you'll never get it dead on like injection. just way too many changing weather conditions for a carb to have a perfect mixture all the time. i'll be saving for a fast ez efi set up. those two cars made me a believer. i thought it was kinda expensive to do but the results were worth it in my opinion. i guess it depends on how much you drive your car too. someone that just cruises to local events it may not be worth going efi. but for someone like me that likes long cruises and often long cruises its definatley worth it in my opinion...


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: 71TA] #752087
07/19/10 08:09 AM
07/19/10 08:09 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
Quote:

That EZ-EFI looks nice.
I was also looking at EFI for my BB but because of the $ I bought a new 830CFM annular, mechanical secondary Speed Demon (with all replaceable jets). Using the LMI A/F meter to properly tune it, it starts better than my modern daily driver. That LMI IS the tool that s required to setup a carb. Reading plugs and other old school methods are JUST that.




while i could not find the 830 annular I found the 850 speed demon

$450

I looked up holley parts since BG's are not listed


jet kit - 50
gasket kit ( for jet changes) - 42
acc pump tuning kit - 120
air bleed assortment kit - 195
LM-2 - single channel O2 sensor - 399

TOTAL - 1256


Now - the carb choice could go another 2-400 bux depending on your selection and the EZ system is on summit for 1749

Both fuel systems are omitted to keep it simple.

If you went with a holley ultra HP 950 ( 800 bux ) the cost get closer and closer... ( 1600 )

not including the built in rev limiter, programmable electric fan switch, and ac idle bump the $150 - $ 500 difference can even get closer from ebag...( 1649 from a quick search)

now your down to $50 - $400 price difference. and remember the EZ Throttle body is 1000 CFM!

\
lets not forget that you set that carb up in the spring ( 50 degrees) and now its 100 out in the dead of summer.... will you jet it to perfection every 20 degree temp change? how about atmospheric changes? how about driving in the mountains? do you jet lean, rich, or stop, pull the bowls and make a change in the middle?

I can change it all from the drivers seat - and if I dont want to touch a thing i can do that too. the system monitors make changes, it checks the O2 sensor and corrects, noting the correction for next time ( self learning )

I was a carb guy through and trough, but after watching this thing learn how to work 2000 CFM on top of a stocker 360 and have better mileage, better driveability, and better manners I'm sold!

I have not even checked it at the dyno or track y
et, but I should not see any major increases unless my carb tuning skills were shot to begin with ( as far as peak power.. but who knows!

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752088
07/19/10 08:33 AM
07/19/10 08:33 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
I plan on driving my 71' roadrunner all the time and probably cross country with some pro touring. Planning a future trip from down here in san antonio, texas up to augusta, maine. Big difference in climates for sure.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752089
07/19/10 09:30 AM
07/19/10 09:30 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 420
Central Ohio
L
Ledman_70 Offline
mopar
Ledman_70  Offline
mopar
L

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 420
Central Ohio
Can someone give me a little more info on the LMI a/f meter? Cost? Availability? How it works, etc. I can tune a carb to run decent, but I can't get it to the gnat's ass. I am having the same issue with the 800 dp Holley on my 426 as I had with the 750 sp... there's a slight stumble right off idle. I haven't tried drilling holes in the primary butterflies yet. Thanks


Jeff Adams 64 426 Polara
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Ledman_70] #752090
07/19/10 10:08 AM
07/19/10 10:08 AM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
G
GregCon Offline
super stock
GregCon  Offline
super stock
G

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
When I read this thread title I thought you meant fuel injection.....and I was going to tell you that injection has some driveability issues but you can get around that by using a good VST setup like Kinsler's. As for power, the max HP is about the same but there's no comparison from any point between idle and full RPM. The fuel injection is just vicious compared to a carb. But, then I realized you were talking about the kind of fuel delivery system they use on Grandma's car. Nevermind!

6093687-Hilborn.jpg (827 downloads)
Last edited by GregCon; 07/19/10 10:13 AM.
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: GregCon] #752091
07/19/10 10:29 AM
07/19/10 10:29 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
P
Pat_Whalen Offline
super gas
Pat_Whalen  Offline
super gas
P

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
I was planning on going with a megasquirt multiport injection setup on my 440 Ramcharger. (DaytonaTurbo )

I think everyone has a particular set of reasons or requirements that would cause them to choose one over the other.

My list of things is:

Driveability
System feedback
Ignition control (power/cruise/economy modes)
Modern "feel"
No need to "keep in tune".

I also have to take into consideration that this truck is my daily driver and also a vehicle that will be used for camping. My current elevation is roughly 1200' AMS, and I could potentially drive in a couple of hours and be pushing close to 7000' AMS. That's not always the best circumstances for running a carb.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Pat_Whalen] #752092
07/19/10 11:38 AM
07/19/10 11:38 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 198
Staten Island, NY
T
Theorio1025 Offline
member
Theorio1025  Offline
member
T

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 198
Staten Island, NY
Has anyone used the powerjection 3 setup? It looks similar to the ez efi, but it has the ability to laptop tune as well.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Theorio1025] #752093
07/19/10 11:48 AM
07/19/10 11:48 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
I could not fir them on my tunnel ram, with EZ EFI I didnt even adjust my throttle / kickdown linkage.

they also require a laptop to make any changes... the handheld on the EZ unit makes all the changes I need.


Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752094
07/19/10 12:03 PM
07/19/10 12:03 PM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 198
Staten Island, NY
T
Theorio1025 Offline
member
Theorio1025  Offline
member
T

Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 198
Staten Island, NY
The tunnel ram isn't an issue for me. How well does the self tuning work on either?

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Theorio1025] #752095
07/19/10 12:32 PM
07/19/10 12:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
the EZ self tuning works excellent. The sensors monitor the engine and make the fuel delivery, which is checked by the O2, which tells the sensors to make any needed adjustments and this happens several times per second. It was cool feeling a stumble off idle diminish to a smooth running motor with bog no where!

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752096
07/19/10 01:23 PM
07/19/10 01:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Mopar_Rich Offline
top fuel
Mopar_Rich  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Quote:

I'm looking for mainly opinions on this thread, but also the pros and cons of these two setups.

Of course costs is the REALLY big one and which is more simplistic. Seems like you could always take the costs of an EFI system, get a decent carb and put the rest of the money towards other parts of the car.

Any opinions/info is appreciated.




CurYellowBird
I can answer any/all questions you may have about the FAST EFI systems, but here's a quick overview of the EZ-EFI system(s):

EZ-EFI TB Pros:
- Easy to install (bolts on instead of a carb)
- No tuning
- It works as advertised
- Great throttle response
- Good drivability, good mileage, good cold start, user can tune the target A/F ratio table as various points (cruise, WOT, etc)

EZ-EFI (TB type) Cons:
- Does not control timing (you use a standard distributor and ignition box)
- Operates in bank-to-bank mode. Not really a draw back because the injectors are in the throttle body.
- Injectors are in TB (wet manifold). Not as "ideal" as port injection.
- Injector sizes limit HP to 550-600 HP for a single TB- No problem if you run two TBs or use the EZ port injected system.
- Requires an EFI fuel system (but any EFI system would)
- Can only drive up to 8 high-Z injectors.

One newer option is the same EZ-EFI ECU but for port injection manifolds. This option gives you more HP capability (8 injectors instead of 4) and the manifold runs dry.

Pricing:
The 30226-kit Single EZ TB (no fuel system components) $1689.
The 30227-kit (30226 kit + fuel system; pump, filters, regulator, etc.) $1945
The 304155 second TB upgrade kit $850
The 302000 EZ-EFI kit for port injection $825

Hope this helps

www.fastmanefi.com

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Mopar_Rich] #752097
07/19/10 02:59 PM
07/19/10 02:59 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
Thanks mopar rich! I'm still learning the fuel injection systems as my experience is only with the TBI 2 barrel holley projection system on a sbc. It really had it's flaws but I don't base that experience on all systems.

I don't foresee myself making 500hp with the engine build I'm planning for this car. More in the 425hp/475lb. range is what I'm shooting for out of my 383.

I do have a complete 440 but I have my own personal reasons for not going with the 440. With the way the price of gas is going and the quality of it, I feel better with the 383. I've got a spare 383 block so I can swap out the numbers one so I can actually put my foot into without fear of breaking original numbers parts.

I looked at those parts you listed and is there a kit for a port injection setup rather than a TB setup? I looked at the last set you listed and it looks like just a wiring harness and some computer stuff. Where are the injectors on that TB setup you listed? Are they below those mini fuel rails?

Is EZ's EFI systems a closed loop system that uses sensors and what not to do self adjustments rather than having to constantly adjust an analog computer? Please forgive me on my lack of knowledge in this area as some of my questions seem to be a little repetitive.

I've got a Barry Grant 750 carb that is one of his first carbs to come out before holley sued him over his "holley look-alike". This is the alternative to using EFI. But after looking at the price of that TB setup from EZ-EFI, I'm starting to lean towards EFI. All the other kits I looked at such as the XFI kit from FAST was around $4500 and others were in the 3-3500 range in price.


Last edited by CurYellowBird; 07/19/10 03:39 PM.
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752098
07/19/10 03:29 PM
07/19/10 03:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,789
Hamilton, Ontario Canada
Magnum Offline
master
Magnum  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,789
Hamilton, Ontario Canada
Quote:

It was cool feeling a stumble off idle diminish to a smooth running motor with bog no where!




I think the debate ends here.


69 Super Bee, 93 Mustang LX, 04 Allure Super
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Magnum] #752099
07/19/10 04:18 PM
07/19/10 04:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 541
chatham, Ilinois
F
fox Offline
super street
fox  Offline
super street
F

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 541
chatham, Ilinois
The only thing FI can do that a carb can't is to be able to make changes rapidly.
I have a running bet with people around here that I can take a factory fuel injection off of a modern car, put a carb on it and get better mileage. No one will take me up on it, but they say I'm crazy.

( factory FI keeps the A/F ratio at 14.4 , i can tune a carb near 15.5 for mileage.)

If you understand how a carb works you can tune any stumble out of it.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752100
07/19/10 04:24 PM
07/19/10 04:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Mopar_Rich Offline
top fuel
Mopar_Rich  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Quote:

I looked at those parts you listed and is there a kit for a port injection setup rather than a TB setup?



The EZ for port injection is exactly that. All the port injected EZ system is, is the ECU and harnesses. You still need a normal TB and the port injection manifold.

Quote:

Where are the injectors on that TB setup you listed? Are they below those mini fuel rails?



Yes. I think the photos of the EZ system are fairly easy to see where the injectors are. They are pointing down at an angle

Quote:

Is EZ's EFI systems a closed loop system that uses sensors and what not to do self adjustments rather than having to constantly adjust an analog computer?



That's precisely what it is. You should go to my site and print out the EZ info. It runs in closed loop and is constantly learning as you drive.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: fox] #752101
07/19/10 04:33 PM
07/19/10 04:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
F
Fury Fan Offline
master
Fury Fan  Offline
master
F

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
Quote:

The only thing FI can do that a carb can't is to be able to make changes rapidly.




Yeah, but that's not 1 thing, that's like 1000 things - per second.

EFI can turn the fuel off completely on a downhill coast, then turn it on so seamlessly that you'd never know -- unless you saw it on the AF or MPG gauge. There's a 1/2 mile long hill on the highway where I usually get 150+ mpg for 30 secs. Try that with a carb. With a carb you're at closed throttle, high vacuum, and pulling fuel thru the idle circuit.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752102
07/19/10 04:36 PM
07/19/10 04:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
F
Fury Fan Offline
master
Fury Fan  Offline
master
F

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
Quote:

I looked at those parts you listed and is there a kit for a port injection setup rather than a TB setup? I looked at the last set you listed and it looks like just a wiring harness and some computer stuff.




I have not yet seen any port-EFI intakes for 383/400 engines. Getting a manifold modified will be your only option.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: fox] #752103
07/19/10 04:52 PM
07/19/10 04:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Quote:

The only thing FI can do that a carb can't is to be able to make changes rapidly.
I have a running bet with people around here that I can take a factory fuel injection off of a modern car, put a carb on it and get better mileage. No one will take me up on it, but they say I'm crazy.

( factory FI keeps the A/F ratio at 14.4 , i can tune a carb near 15.5 for mileage.)

If you understand how a carb works you can tune any stumble out of it.




I agree a carb can be tuned well, however an aftermarket efi system can be tuned to run at whatever cruise a/f you want. The OEM is stuck on 14.7 stoic because they have emissions standards to meet. I would guess you could tune a port efi system more lean than a carb if you have an intake manifold with low cylinder-to-cylinder airflow variances. You could have the same a/f ratio in each cylinder instead of dealing with the wet AND dry flow variances a carb intake experiences.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752104
07/19/10 05:25 PM
07/19/10 05:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
You won't gain one HP w/ FI and w/ well tuned carb that is correct for you application you won't suffer any drivablity problems either. EFI is nice but VERY expensive. any gain in MPGs (and who cares about that) would be so small it'd take you 10 years to get your money back. Unless you have a boosted car EFI is a waste of money


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Mr.Yuck] #752105
07/19/10 05:29 PM
07/19/10 05:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
I would of done a poll on this but I can't figure out how to set one up.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752106
07/19/10 05:44 PM
07/19/10 05:44 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 319
Denver
E
Explodo Offline
enthusiast
Explodo  Offline
enthusiast
E

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 319
Denver
A possible issue depending on your EFI fuel system PSI and car: A good fuel pump. The fuel system has been the biggest pain on mine. The EFI system itself isn't any trouble at all. I'm running a Mass-flo EFI system and have an Anderson Ford Motorsport computer to put on when I put it all back together because I hate that the Mass-flo system gives you zero feedback. The fuel system I've ended up with as an Aeromotive a1000 stealth sump built into a stock tank.


'67 440 Satellite
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Mr.Yuck] #752107
07/19/10 06:01 PM
07/19/10 06:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
P
Pat_Whalen Offline
super gas
Pat_Whalen  Offline
super gas
P

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
Quote:

You won't gain one HP w/ FI and w/ well tuned carb that is correct for you application you won't suffer any drivablity problems either. EFI is nice but VERY expensive. any gain in MPGs (and who cares about that) would be so small it'd take you 10 years to get your money back. Unless you have a boosted car EFI is a waste of money




I know you're a huge proponent of carbs, and voice your opinion every time this debate comes up.

What I'd like is a definition of "drivability".

I consider the ability to drive from 10' above sea level to 7000' above sea level and have the engine perform (economy and power) exactly the same in both locations to be drivability. Show me a carb that can do that, and I'll agree there are no differences.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Pat_Whalen] #752108
07/19/10 06:45 PM
07/19/10 06:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Quote:

You won't gain one HP w/ FI and w/ well tuned carb that is correct for you application you won't suffer any drivablity problems either. EFI is nice but VERY expensive. any gain in MPGs (and who cares about that) would be so small it'd take you 10 years to get your money back. Unless you have a boosted car EFI is a waste of money




I know you're a huge proponent of carbs, and voice your opinion every time this debate comes up.

What I'd like is a definition of "drivability".

I consider the ability to drive from 10' above sea level to 7000' above sea level and have the engine perform (economy and power) exactly the same in both locations to be drivability. Show me a carb that can do that, and I'll agree there are no differences.



You represent a small minority of car people who an EFI set-up would help, although you can tune a carb as well.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Mr.Yuck] #752109
07/19/10 06:52 PM
07/19/10 06:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
P
Pat_Whalen Offline
super gas
Pat_Whalen  Offline
super gas
P

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You won't gain one HP w/ FI and w/ well tuned carb that is correct for you application you won't suffer any drivablity problems either. EFI is nice but VERY expensive. any gain in MPGs (and who cares about that) would be so small it'd take you 10 years to get your money back. Unless you have a boosted car EFI is a waste of money




I know you're a huge proponent of carbs, and voice your opinion every time this debate comes up.

What I'd like is a definition of "drivability".

I consider the ability to drive from 10' above sea level to 7000' above sea level and have the engine perform (economy and power) exactly the same in both locations to be drivability. Show me a carb that can do that, and I'll agree there are no differences.



You represent a small minority of car people who an EFI set-up would help, although you can tune a carb as well.




Agreed. I wouldn't call it a small percentage, but a minority. I'm sure there are plenty of people who drive in a situation where they don't realize their carburetor is performing less than optimally.

If there is an arbitrary number (lets say 10) of things that a fuel delivery system should accomplish, optimally you'd like to see all 10 of those things be at their highest available values. And while there is a concession of initial system cost with EFI, there is no way that a carburetor can come close to matching it in all facets of the system. You could tune in 20 times a day and still not get it as mathematically perfect as an intelligent circuit would.

What is the potential negative of EFI, other than initial cost? I know you often cite complexity, but in reality, thats a misnomer. Hoping you've got the right combinations of screws turns in, rods bent, etc with a carb application is much less precise and can be considered much more complex than an electronic "on/off" and open modulation of air.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752110
07/19/10 06:57 PM
07/19/10 06:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 104,346
Garden Grove, CA
OzHemi Offline
Penguin-hating Ginger
OzHemi  Offline
Penguin-hating Ginger

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 104,346
Garden Grove, CA
Quote:

I would of done a poll on this but I can't figure out how to set one up.



Carb or EFI
multiple choice
Votes accepted starting: 07/19/10 05:57 PM
You must vote before you can view the results of this poll.
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752111
07/19/10 07:17 PM
07/19/10 07:17 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,456
oklahoma
F
forphorty Offline
pro stock
forphorty  Offline
pro stock
F

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,456
oklahoma
If you already have a carb( if i understand corectly you have a BG 750)put it on and run it. Spend the money instead on a Gear Venders overdrive. Especially considering you said that you plan on doing a lot of highway driving. You can always add EFI later if you decide you don't care for the carb.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: OzHemi] #752112
07/19/10 07:17 PM
07/19/10 07:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,501
Eagle, Idaho
Neil Offline
The Doctor is in.
Neil  Offline
The Doctor is in.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,501
Eagle, Idaho
Fuel Infection will never find it's way onto any old car I own.

I must be in the minority because I have had several carbureted vehicles as daily drivers and have not experienced all the incurable stumbling, bogging, stalling, ect. that everyone else talks so much about.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Neil] #752113
07/19/10 07:57 PM
07/19/10 07:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
P
Pat_Whalen Offline
super gas
Pat_Whalen  Offline
super gas
P

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,481
Mesa, AZ
I'd guess it's just a preference.

OE went to EFI who long ago? Top fuel dragsters use mechanical fuel injection. There has to be a reason to it.

Furthermore, I can only imagine (because I'm admitting to never having done it) how much "fun" it is to try and keep a carb perfectly in tune. By perfectly I mean a carb that complies with mixing any way you want it through every RPM and driving scenario.

A crank vs. power windows will both get the window up and down. How would you rather do it?

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Neil] #752114
07/19/10 07:58 PM
07/19/10 07:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
Lots of good discussion. I'll add I run XFI on a 496B... why?

- Drivability
- Adaptability... straight gas no problem, 10% alcohol, no problem. 800' altitude no problem, 8000' altitude, no problem
- Fuel economy. I like to be able to drive my "hobby car" a good bit without a crazy gas bill or 30 gallon fuel tank. 14 MPG travelling but not babying it with 550 streetable HP on tap is worth something to me.
- Fun. I have enjoyed setting up and refining the maps in the XFI. If I didn't I would probably pick EZ EFI.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Neil] #752115
07/19/10 08:03 PM
07/19/10 08:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
feets Offline
Senior Management
feets  Offline
Senior Management

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 28,067
Irving, TX
I had a nice running carb on my 440 before I went turbo. I put lots of time into the carb making it as perfect as it could be. All I had to do was hit the starter and it'd fire up every time.
If I wanted to lean it out to get better mileage, performance suffered. If I fattened it up to get power then drivability issues would arise and mileage dropped.
I was perfectly happy with the setup.
After going turbo, I fought with carbs. That never worked out for me so I went EFI.
As far as I'm concerned, I'll stick with EFI. You could say I'm fuel infected if you like but I'm happy with it.
I can lean it out as much as I like on the highway and still be fat and happy under power. There is simply no comparison.
There are better units than mine out there. They have more features and options. However, mine can still do the following:
1) Run any fuel air ratio I need at any rpm and manifold pressure (vacuum or boost)
2) Shut off fuel when coasting
3) Adjust timing for cruise, acceleration, coasting, boost, or vacuum
4) Adjust for hot or cold starts
5) Prime fuel system for any length of time desired
6) Display rpm, temperature, timing, manifold vacuum, level of detonation (if any), battery voltage, air/fuel ratio, throttle position, and fuel timing all in one screen
7) Knock sensor will detect any level of detonation and adjust fuel/spark immediately
8) Soft rpm limiter that pulls as much timing as I want, dropping the rpm any amount I want at the speed I want
9) Hard rpm limiter that cuts fuel for a banging style limiter
10) Hard limiter can be used as a two step box with a soft limiter on the top end
11) Cooling fan on/off where I want
12) Control a turbo wastegate
13) Control nitrous solenoids
14) Trigger a shift light
15) Record every sensor and engine function for any reasonable amount of time and play it back as fast or slow as I want
16) Print out graphics from the datalog
17) Download the datalog into spreadsheets so you can view them later.
18) You can adjust the tune while driving
19) Tune the car from the front seat instead of reaching across spinning fan blades and scorching headers
20) Upload an entirely new tune in less than 30 seconds if you want to run race gas
21) Automatically adjust for a tank of "bad gas"

It'll do other stuff as well but that's what I can think of off the top of my head.

Will your carburetor and distributor do all that for you?

Gimme EFI! I'm not afraid of change.


We are brothers and sisters doing time on the planet for better or worse. I'll take the better, if you don't mind.
- Stu Harmon
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: feets] #752116
07/19/10 08:42 PM
07/19/10 08:42 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
That EZ-EFI system really seems to be the best one for my planned setup and it's simple enough compared to holley's projunk.

My other option I'm looking into is swapping out the factory 4 speed for a 5 speed and then going with a 440. At that point it should be a little easier to find a port injection setup for a 440. But the costs and looks of the EZ-EFI is definately appealing.

Anyone know if you can use a stock dual snorkel air cleaner and edelbrock rpm intake with this setup without having hood clearance issues? I think since the TB is shorter than a carb I should have plenty of clearance....hopefully.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752117
07/19/10 08:45 PM
07/19/10 08:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,501
Eagle, Idaho
Neil Offline
The Doctor is in.
Neil  Offline
The Doctor is in.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,501
Eagle, Idaho
I think a lot of people have issues with carburetors because they are cheap and bought a used one at a swap meet and it was already messed up to begin with, or they buy a new one and take it from the box and bolt it on and then get angry when it doesn't work perfectly. I take every carburetor I buy and reset everything before bolting it onto the engine. Doing so doesn't always mean it's going to work perfectly, but it will almost guarantee the engine will run well enough to drive until I can fine tune the air fuel screws and jetting.

All oem the fuel injected cars I have driven have lots of gas pedal "slack" at a continious speed until the engine responds. A properly set up 4 barrel carb, especially a spread bore model, has a much better feel to it in my book when it's time to speed up and pass someone.

If FI is all that then why do a lot of the drag race guys trashcan the FI system on their 5.0 and camaros and replace it with a single plane and a big holley or demon carb?

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Neil] #752118
07/19/10 08:57 PM
07/19/10 08:57 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
Most of the time they trash their FI systems because they are modifying the car so much and making more power to the point where the stock computer cannot keep up with the demands of the motor.

The factory FI's on camaros were either a TBI or TPI setup. Those setups work well with a 305 or 350 making right around 300 or 325hp. After that, the systems can no longer keep up and the engine powerband falls flat on its face at 5500rpm anyways with those setups. The computers at that point, if stock, are POS anyways.

You can easily get a 350 to get 380hp on a good day, the problem is that those guys do all the mods and neglect the computer and FI system thinking "O it'll keep up fine", then they get pissed when it doesn't so they just throw a carb on it. It's like putting a 383 stroker in a car with 2.29 gears thinking your gonna pull 10 seconds in the quarter.

Your comparing a stock system that was meant for emissions and government standards to aftermarket systems that blow the stock FI's out of the water. I've never had a problem with my carb on my chevy, at the same time when I tested that projection system, I was blown away at how good the throttle response was compared to a carb. Yes the edelbrock carb I had was in perfect tune and I double checked before the swap so I could feel an unbiased difference if there was one.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752119
07/19/10 09:10 PM
07/19/10 09:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
Another thing I wanted to ask is if you had to use a specific distributor with the EZ-EFI system? Or can you use a regular aftermarket electronic distributor? I was planning on taking my stock "single point" distributor and converting it to electronic, but if I have to use a specific distributor with this setup then there is really "no point" to the conversion lol.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752120
07/19/10 09:15 PM
07/19/10 09:15 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
EZ has nothing to do with timing, all you need is a clean tach signal from your coil ( or a tach signal adapter they supply for stock chrysler ignitions) and your set.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752121
07/19/10 09:29 PM
07/19/10 09:29 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,074
detroit, mi
POS Dakota Offline
super stock
POS Dakota  Offline
super stock

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,074
detroit, mi
Quote:

EZ has nothing to do with timing, all you need is a clean tach signal from your coil ( or a tach signal adapter they supply for stock chrysler ignitions) and your set.




I am a complete factory EFI hater. I've been frustrated with the factory efi in my truck since i got it and it's lack of flexibility. It's worthless. Went with a mighty demon.

BUT...EZ EFI in my opinion is the best thing out there for someone who wants almost instant driveability without a masters degree in standalone tuning. Some of those systems are a lot to learn. Some of us dont care to go that far with it because then it becomes work. I'm sure some can relate to that.

In your case where tuning 2 carbs to run together on a tunnel ram can be a PITA, the EZ EFI is definitely the way to go.

You should post a few vids to show how it starts, runs and drives dave. I would really like to see that.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: POS Dakota] #752122
07/19/10 09:31 PM
07/19/10 09:31 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
that is a good idea.... i just need a video camera... i only take photographs...

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752123
07/19/10 09:40 PM
07/19/10 09:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
Quote:

BUT...EZ EFI in my opinion is the best thing out there for someone who wants almost instant driveability without a masters degree in standalone tuning. Some of those systems are a lot to learn. Some of us dont care to go that far with it because then it becomes work. I'm sure some can relate to that.





i agree 100%


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752124
07/19/10 09:57 PM
07/19/10 09:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
A
abodyjoe Offline
I Live Here
abodyjoe  Offline
I Live Here
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,076
Berlin, N.J.
Quote:

that is a good idea.... i just need a video camera... i only take photographs...





i'll charge the battery. when ya want to go beat the hell out of that cuda?


It's better to keep your mouth shut and give the impression that you're stupid than to open it and remove all doubt.

www.MoparMisfits.com
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: abodyjoe] #752125
07/19/10 10:02 PM
07/19/10 10:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
ANYTIME!

can i borrow it for the dyno on wed?

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: abodyjoe] #752126
07/19/10 10:04 PM
07/19/10 10:04 PM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,383
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
Dragula Offline
I Live Here
Dragula  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,383
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
I have been a proponant of efi since the 90's, and the older tune it as you go systems. They take a lot more work to set-up than the current efi systems.

I have had some really good carburators over time, and the efi is still smoother and much more drivable. The info/feedback is really aweome too. My first system was just too much info to take it all in at once and took time to learn, but the newer software is self learning when yu put the target A/f in, so the hard part is now eliminated.


'70 Cuda,...605 EFI Hemi Street Car (6.20 best pass, 1.33 60ft)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYw6RA-k5Bk (6.25 at 108.75mph from inside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zQEb9uxFng (6.25 at 108mph from outside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCvfzsC4NgM (9.9)

'66 Barracuda AWB Stretched nose Blown 440 Car in build stage

'71 Duster Drag Car 400 Low Deck 512 best 6.002 at 115.44mph
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znuo3jMUXTk
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Dragula] #752127
07/19/10 10:05 PM
07/19/10 10:05 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
its a chevy - but you get the idea youtue EZ EFI fire up

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752128
07/19/10 10:42 PM
07/19/10 10:42 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 236
Maryland
C
cudaboone Offline
enthusiast
cudaboone  Offline
enthusiast
C

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 236
Maryland
WHO is worried about MPG. I want HP. Does fast ez-efi have anything for a 528 aluminum hemi with 700+ HP.

6095062-IMG_0686.JPG (268 downloads)
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: cudaboone] #752129
07/19/10 10:43 PM
07/19/10 10:43 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,337
the house on the left.
C
cogen80 Offline
master
cogen80  Offline
master
C

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,337
the house on the left.
Quote:

WHO is worried about MPG. I want HP. Does fast ez-efi have anything for a 528 aluminum hemi with 700+ HP.





Not Found

The requested URL /ubbthreads/upload2/6095062-IMG_0686.JPG was not found on this server.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: cogen80] #752130
07/19/10 11:14 PM
07/19/10 11:14 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
G
GregCon Offline
super stock
GregCon  Offline
super stock
G

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 798
Houston TX
Really, if you have a big inch Hemi with 700HP you need to step up to a 'real' FAST EFI type system,not the EZ.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: GregCon] #752131
07/19/10 11:51 PM
07/19/10 11:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
CurYellowBird Offline OP
mopar
CurYellowBird  Offline OP
mopar

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 583
San Antonio, TX
Well the pro touring crowd cares about MPG. Sure would suck trying to do long distance driving and having to stop every 150-180 miles (if your lucky) to top off the gas tank.

My goal out of this is power with reliability.


Project War Bird: 1971 Plymouth Roadrunner 383 4 speed with air conditioning GY3 Curious yellow All original
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Neil] #752132
07/20/10 12:20 AM
07/20/10 12:20 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
Quote:

I think a lot of people have issues with carburetors because ... they buy a new one and take it from the box and bolt it on and then get angry when it doesn't work perfectly.




Fully. Just because you dropped $400 on a new carb, does't mean you can plop it on your engine and expect it to be 100% perfect for your application. Was talking to one self-proclaimed gear-head who was complaining about the poor performance of his holley 750 vac carb. The thought never even occured to him to buy a jet kit! Nevermind messing with accelerator pump shots, pump cams, secondary springs, etc.

You want to know why the efi stuff I spent so much money on has sat on the shelf for the past 3 years instead of on my 440? I spent some time tuning the choke and primaries on my thermoquad and got it to the point where any time I drove the car(spring-fall) I could get in the car, give it 3 pumps, hit the key, let it warm for 30 seconds, kick it down and go. The motivation to change to the efi stuff I had is just not there.

Another issue I see is what type of carb to run for what you want out of it. You want driveability, mileage and performance? Then I think you should be looking at spreadbore carbs with a well tuned choke instead of the square bore holleys with the milled choke horn. Really depends on the application IMO.

But you are right, a carb will never adapt and react like an EFI system. That and a port efi never has the wet flow issues which should make start-up smoother.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: GregCon] #752133
07/20/10 06:55 AM
07/20/10 06:55 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,337
the house on the left.
C
cogen80 Offline
master
cogen80  Offline
master
C

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,337
the house on the left.
Quote:

Really, if you have a big inch Hemi with 700HP you need to step up to a 'real' FAST EFI type system,not the EZ.





i believe that dual quad fast ez efi on that barracuda pictured is good to 1000 hp or so, you would fall well short of that and should be ok.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Mr.Yuck] #752134
07/20/10 07:02 AM
07/20/10 07:02 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
Quote:

EFI is nice but VERY expensive. any gain in MPGs (and who cares about that) would be so small it'd take you 10 years to get your money back.




i guess you didnt read my post with the cost breakdowns....

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DJVCuda] #752135
07/20/10 07:41 AM
07/20/10 07:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
F
Fury Fan Offline
master
Fury Fan  Offline
master
F

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,533
Indiana
How many of you fans of the 'well-tuned' carb have ever put a wideband in your car to see your carb's tuning? I'm betting DaytonaTurbo and only a few others in this thread have done that.

Used a wideband to tune your carb?
single choice
Votes accepted starting: 07/20/10 06:40 AM
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Fury Fan] #752136
07/20/10 09:02 AM
07/20/10 09:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,436
Oklahoma City OK
Cudajon Offline
pro stock
Cudajon  Offline
pro stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,436
Oklahoma City OK
In the Sept 2010 edition of "Car Craft" under "whats your problem" they document a problem I've noticed for several years. A cammed engine will throw a wideband oxygen sensor off since the overlap can pass unburned fuel into the exhaust. I started out with a LM1 the LM2 and now run a Autometer wideband O2 sensor in my car. At idle it shows 16:1 (top of the scale) but the instant I touch the accelerator it jumps to 14:1. What this means is that any EFI that goes closed loop at idle is going to be riching the mixture to overcome this seemingly lean condition. This is why all EFI systems come with a preloaded map to get you started. My question on the EZ EFI or any other "learning" system, whats it gonna do at idle.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Cudajon] #752137
07/20/10 09:50 AM
07/20/10 09:50 AM
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,383
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
Dragula Offline
I Live Here
Dragula  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 12,383
Taxes & Virus's R-US, NY
Quote:

In the Sept 2010 edition of "Car Craft" under "whats your problem" they document a problem I've noticed for several years. A cammed engine will throw a wideband oxygen sensor off since the overlap can pass unburned fuel into the exhaust. I started out with a LM1 the LM2 and now run a Autometer wideband O2 sensor in my car. At idle it shows 16:1 (top of the scale) but the instant I touch the accelerator it jumps to 14:1. What this means is that any EFI that goes closed loop at idle is going to be riching the mixture to overcome this seemingly lean condition. This is why all EFI systems come with a preloaded map to get you started. My question on the EZ EFI or any other "learning" system, whats it gonna do at idle.




Lean at idle is generally a lack of back pressure, or it might be the sensor placement too close and not seeing all the exhaust in the collector, or lastly, raw fuel actually getting on the sensor and cooling it, being too rich. The plugs will tell you which way it actually is.

That's why I like the carbs with screw in air bleeds, you can tune the idle mixture to near perfection with them and it doesn't effect anything else.

The efi should have a smoother idle just based on the better metering of the fuel, but if it doesn't and it surges, the IAC, the throttle blades, and the threshold values can be used to sort that out. Typically in that order, so the engine doesn't surge, and it remains nice and steady. That's where, if you have a nasty cam, you might get to where you need timing control as well and step up to full efi. The learning efi will try to adjust itself with the above mentioned IAC, but it still may need some manual intervention.

The cam in my Cuda would not be runable on the street with a carb or ez-efi....It does in fact run super well with the Classic FAST that I use, but it wasn't easy to set-up initially. The learning efi is waaay worth the $$$ for some of us. I am not worried about the payback on it, nor the fuel mileage. Keeping the engine alive & happy and drivable was my goal.

Last edited by Dragula; 07/20/10 09:56 AM.

'70 Cuda,...605 EFI Hemi Street Car (6.20 best pass, 1.33 60ft)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYw6RA-k5Bk (6.25 at 108.75mph from inside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zQEb9uxFng (6.25 at 108mph from outside car)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCvfzsC4NgM (9.9)

'66 Barracuda AWB Stretched nose Blown 440 Car in build stage

'71 Duster Drag Car 400 Low Deck 512 best 6.002 at 115.44mph
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Znuo3jMUXTk
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Cudajon] #752138
07/20/10 09:52 AM
07/20/10 09:52 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
Quote:

In the Sept 2010 edition of "Car Craft" under "whats your problem" they document a problem I've noticed for several years. A cammed engine will throw a wideband oxygen sensor off since the overlap can pass unburned fuel into the exhaust. I started out with a LM1 the LM2 and now run a Autometer wideband O2 sensor in my car. At idle it shows 16:1 (top of the scale) but the instant I touch the accelerator it jumps to 14:1. What this means is that any EFI that goes closed loop at idle is going to be riching the mixture to overcome this seemingly lean condition. This is why all EFI systems come with a preloaded map to get you started. My question on the EZ EFI or any other "learning" system, whats it gonna do at idle.




I dont claim to be an expert, I have one system, but Mopar Rich has installed more then I -

Mopar Rich's reply to the cam question

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Dragula] #752139
07/20/10 09:58 AM
07/20/10 09:58 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
DJVCuda Offline
I Live Here
DJVCuda  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,179
Atco NJ
in my experience - the EZ system did in fact smooth out my idle - I have a mopar p4452992 474 lift cam, it would not idle under 900 with the carbs and shook alot...

with the EFI it took a few weeks, but I noticed a significantly smoother idle, hardly any shake and it will idle lower then with the carbs.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Mopar_Rich] #752140
07/20/10 10:22 AM
07/20/10 10:22 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,976
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,976
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

Quote:

I'm looking for mainly opinions on this thread, but also the pros and cons of these two setups.

Of course costs is the REALLY big one and which is more simplistic. Seems like you could always take the costs of an EFI system, get a decent carb and put the rest of the money towards other parts of the car.

Any opinions/info is appreciated.




CurYellowBird
I can answer any/all questions you may have about the FAST EFI systems, but here's a quick overview of the EZ-EFI system(s):

EZ-EFI TB Pros:
- Easy to install (bolts on instead of a carb)
- No tuning
- It works as advertised
- Great throttle response
- Good drivability, good mileage, good cold start, user can tune the target A/F ratio table as various points (cruise, WOT, etc)

EZ-EFI (TB type) Cons:
- Does not control timing (you use a standard distributor and ignition box)
- Operates in bank-to-bank mode. Not really a draw back because the injectors are in the throttle body.
- Injectors are in TB (wet manifold). Not as "ideal" as port injection.
- Injector sizes limit HP to 550-600 HP for a single TB- No problem if you run two TBs or use the EZ port injected system.
- Requires an EFI fuel system (but any EFI system would)
- Can only drive up to 8 high-Z injectors.

One newer option is the same EZ-EFI ECU but for port injection manifolds. This option gives you more HP capability (8 injectors instead of 4) and the manifold runs dry.

Pricing:
The 30226-kit Single EZ TB (no fuel system components) $1689.
The 30227-kit (30226 kit + fuel system; pump, filters, regulator, etc.) $1945
The 304155 second TB upgrade kit $850
The 302000 EZ-EFI kit for port injection $825

Hope this helps

www.fastmanefi.com




Rich are these prices directly thru you ? If so does summit get upset because they are selling them for more ?

Also is the EZ setup to run E85 ?

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: JohnRR] #752141
07/20/10 12:20 PM
07/20/10 12:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Mopar_Rich Offline
top fuel
Mopar_Rich  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
I am a WD and dealer for FAST. I also do tech support and training. My prices are better because I sell a lot of this stuff and (I hate to brag) I EARN the discount.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Cudajon] #752142
07/20/10 12:29 PM
07/20/10 12:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Mopar_Rich Offline
top fuel
Mopar_Rich  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Quote:

In the Sept 2010 edition of "Car Craft" under "whats your problem" they document a problem I've noticed for several years. A cammed engine will throw a wideband oxygen sensor off since the overlap can pass unburned fuel into the exhaust. I started out with a LM1 the LM2 and now run a Autometer wideband O2 sensor in my car. At idle it shows 16:1 (top of the scale) but the instant I touch the accelerator it jumps to 14:1. What this means is that any EFI that goes closed loop at idle is going to be riching the mixture to overcome this seemingly lean condition. This is why all EFI systems come with a preloaded map to get you started. My question on the EZ EFI or any other "learning" system, whats it gonna do at idle.




Good question.
You can read lean at idle if you run open exhaust (common training issue for my race buddies) or if the cam has a lot of overlap.

In these situations with the XFI system I don't allow closed loop operation below an RPM where the O2 can be trusted.

The EZ-EFI system is not as user flexible, but it does limit what it does at idle - automatically (it knows the RPM and TPS). This handles the idle conditions of wild motors quiet well.

One last point on the 700 HP HEMI:
A dual throttle body EZ will handle up to 1000 HP and the port injection EZ can handle up to about 800 HP. The reason the port injected is less, is that the injectors must be high-Z and it's hard to find high-Z injectors that are over 65 lbs/hr. The injectors used on the TB EZ are special made high-Z units.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Fury Fan] #752143
07/20/10 12:39 PM
07/20/10 12:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,501
Eagle, Idaho
Neil Offline
The Doctor is in.
Neil  Offline
The Doctor is in.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,501
Eagle, Idaho
Quote:

How many of you fans of the 'well-tuned' carb have ever put a wideband in your car to see your carb's tuning? I'm betting DaytonaTurbo and only a few others in this thread have done that.




As long as the plugs read good and the engine runs nice and smooth all the way through the rpm range that's good enough for me.

I know a guy with a 5.0 who has replaced almost all the factory ford EFI parts and bought a very expensive tuning software setup for it. He spends a staggering amount of time fiddling with it (more time chasing imaginary problems, imo) and the car runs the same et's over and over even if the air/fuel ratio and other settings are off a little bit one way or the other. I can sleep well at night knowing my air/fuel ratio is too rich by .01%, but some other people can't I guess.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Fury Fan] #752144
07/20/10 02:00 PM
07/20/10 02:00 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Mopar_Rich Offline
top fuel
Mopar_Rich  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Quote:

How many of you fans of the 'well-tuned' carb have ever put a wideband in your car to see your carb's tuning? I'm betting DaytonaTurbo and only a few others in this thread have done that.




Well I have done this on customers street cars running 3 circuit Dominators. The idle A/F was pretty good and WOT was dead on, but the cruise ranges were so far off it was scary to think you would even think of cruising like that.

From those experiences I would definitively suggest that a Dominator carb user, that wants to run on the street, invest in a good O2 tuning aid and take the time to figure out how to get the mid cruising range dialed in.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: cudaboone] #752145
07/20/10 02:05 PM
07/20/10 02:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 571
Beaverton, OR, USA
Alikazam Offline
super gas
Alikazam  Offline
super gas

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 571
Beaverton, OR, USA
Quote:

WHO is worried about MPG. I want HP. Does fast ez-efi have anything for a 528 aluminum hemi with 700+ HP.




You'd probably need 4 1200 cc/min or larger injectors for that, maybe 1600 cc/min. Not sure if the FAST system would support that but I'm sure there is a way to do it Unless you went dual EFI TB setup. Just remember the fuel system has to support all that too!

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: POS Dakota] #752146
07/20/10 02:47 PM
07/20/10 02:47 PM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,025
Bucks County, PA
5
500Stroker Offline
500Stroker  Offline
5

Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,025
Bucks County, PA
Quote:

Quote:

You should post a few vids to show how it starts, runs and drives dave. I would really like to see that.


That is a sight to see. He reaches in the driver side window to turn the key with his right hand while patting himself on the back with his left.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: CurYellowBird] #752147
07/20/10 04:24 PM
07/20/10 04:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Mr.Yuck Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet
Mr.Yuck  Offline
Not enough dumb comments...yet

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,562
Brookeville, Md
Quote:

Well the pro touring crowd cares about MPG. Sure would suck trying to do long distance driving and having to stop every 150-180 miles (if your lucky) to top off the gas tank.

My goal out of this is power with reliability.




my supercharged 440 67 coronet all 3856 lbs of it managed 15mpg @ 70 mph over 110 miles round trip w/ 3.91's and a 727. w/ a 4 speed it woul have been much better. even at 15mpg that gets me about 300 per tank. My 340 swinger w/ a 750 DP and 3.55's and 727 netted about 17mpg at 70. Both were extremely reliable. It's all in the tune and getting the right carb for your application. Just as it will be if you go EFI. you will need the right set-up and the right tune. It just cost a few dollars more for EFI. BUT hey I spent $2100 on a six-pack so who am I to judge...hahaha. Really if I had the cash to donk of for a complete EFI set-up I'd buy a supercharger with it and push the air down a carb. That's REAL bang for you buck!


[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/pui5j.jpg[/IMG]
Coming soon!!!!
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: 500Stroker] #752148
07/20/10 04:57 PM
07/20/10 04:57 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 92
PA
6
68_CONV_300 Offline
member
68_CONV_300  Offline
member
6

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 92
PA
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You should post a few vids to show how it starts, runs and drives dave. I would really like to see that.


That is a sight to see. He reaches in the driver side window to turn the key with his right hand while patting himself on the back with his left.




and what's wrong with that ??? my guess is you will do the same once you install yours

I have about 2 weeks of drive time on my car with the EZ EFI kit. I have to say it was the best $$ I EVER spent on this car ... My coronet project will be getting a port injection kit from FAST



Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Mopar_Rich] #752149
07/20/10 05:05 PM
07/20/10 05:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,976
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 74,976
U.S.S.A.
Quote:

I am a WD and dealer for FAST. I also do tech support and training. My prices are better because I sell a lot of this stuff and (I hate to brag) I EARN the discount.




Didn't know that , I thought you were FAST .

You skipped my E85 question though , will the EZ run E85? I have an engine I built that will see very little time for it's intended purpose and it's 12.5 compression. I was going to setup a small fuel cell and run it on E85 the 99.5% of the time it's not doing what I originally built it for and considering the cost of an E85 carb, and the fact that it would be a seperate stand alone system, it won't cost much more to run EZ EFI.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: JohnRR] #752150
07/20/10 05:23 PM
07/20/10 05:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
Mopar_Rich Offline
top fuel
Mopar_Rich  Offline
top fuel

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,938
Sonora CA
[quote Didn't know that , I thought you were FAST .

You skipped my E85 question though , will the EZ run E85? I have an engine I built that will see very little time for it's intended purpose and it's 12.5 compression.




Gee thanks for assuming I was Comp Cams - but sorry, just a plane old racer/engineer..

No, the EZ system will not support E85. The target A/F ratios are entirely different as is the warm up and acceleration algorithms. Think of it it this way: If the stoc A/f ratio is 14.7 than EZ likes it. The ideal stoc for E85 is about 10:1.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Fury Fan] #752151
07/21/10 01:25 AM
07/21/10 01:25 AM
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
DaytonaTurbo Offline
Too Many Posts
DaytonaTurbo  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,318
Manitoba, Canada
You do not have to run your efi closed loop at idle. I would not want my combo setup to run closed loop at idle or during initial warm-up.

Quote:

How many of you fans of the 'well-tuned' carb have ever put a wideband in your car to see your carb's tuning? I'm betting DaytonaTurbo and only a few others in this thread have done that.




Yes I did put a wideband to my thermoquad. I was surprised at how lean I was running at cruise, and the motor did not seem to mind at all. As for cold start-up and cold driveability, I had more luck spending a cool morning tweaking the choke linkage to get the choke door where I wanted it. Shockingly enough, the factory recommendation was a great place to start!

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: DaytonaTurbo] #752152
01/15/13 12:59 AM
01/15/13 12:59 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Western Washington State
A
aka.Gumby Offline
member
aka.Gumby  Offline
member
A

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3
Western Washington State
I see that it has been a while since anyone posted in this topic, so I thought I would add a little of my knowledge in here on this topic.

I have built a very stout 440 for my 78 Power Wagon. Lots of very good parts and have over built everything so that this thing never breaks. 4340 chromoly H rods, stock stroke, steel crank internal balance, ARP stud kits throughout, Stealth Aluminum heads (fully inspected and cleaned up by my racing machine shop, and more.. Running the Air gap RPM dual plane intake, with the Powerjection III EFI system. While the engine is finished, I am still building the run/test stand for it all. This is where I will break in the engine. As we all know, our ring gears on are on the torque converters, So I will have the fully overhauled and upgraded 727, and the overhauled NP203 full time 4X4 transfer case all assembled together as one big ass unit on this stand. Allowing me to test the tranny, transfer case, and engine, and put them through all of the paces, except the ability to put it under a load.

The reason for this post. The Powerjection III does have the ability to run run blended fuels. In the software application that it comes with to run on your computer, there is a section for blended fuels. When I spoke with the people at Profession-Products, I asked about the brown wire that is currently not used, and asked if this was for a blended fuel (alcohol) detector, which he said it was, but had not been developed yet. I then asked can it just be set up manually if I know I am running E85 for example. He said yes, that's what that whole section if for. This, and the Powerjection III's super simplicity were the selling points for me.

Gasoline, WILL become scarce and more expensive at some point in time, and having my truck already set up for blended fuels will mean LESS expense in the future.

if you plan on running the blended higher alcohol content fuels, you will want to overhaul your fuel delivery system. Since alcohol carried lots of water with it, it's best to replace your 20, 30, 40 year or older fuel lines with good quality stainless steel lines. The Alcohol content and the water will corrode the basic soft steel lines we all have from the factory.

This system came with a high pressure pump and regulator that requires a return line back to the tank, which I will have to install as I replace the old lines.

E85 is the fuel of the future, and with EFI, at least the Powerjection III system, I can switch back and forth with just the simple selection of a different map. That is NOT something you can do with a carb...ever. Alcohol requires a lot more fuel going into the engine, which on a carb means about 50 to 60% larger jets.

So far the only downside to the Powerjection III system is that there is no hand held mapper or tuner. You have to use a laptop / netbook to plug into it to make any of these changes. I'm thinking of building one into my truck or at least have it with me somehow.

Once I have the test stand done, tranny rebuilt, and T-case done (doing them all myself as I did the engine), I will post more here about it then.

I know Edellbrock has recently come out with their own, which has a nice hand held tuner. All of these other EFI systems have a big brain box that has to be mounted somewhere. Mine has it built in to the throttle body itself, along with the MAP sensor, Idle air valve, throttle position sensor. With connections to water temp, tach signal, power, and to the wide band O2 sensor. but that's it.. I hope it all runs well when I fire it up for the first time. !!!!

Rich

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Mopar_Rich] #752153
01/15/13 05:55 PM
01/15/13 05:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
Skeptic Offline
master
Skeptic  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
Quote:

Quote:

I'm looking for mainly opinions on this thread, but also the pros and cons of these two setups.

Of course costs is the REALLY big one and which is more simplistic. Seems like you could always take the costs of an EFI system, get a decent carb and put the rest of the money towards other parts of the car.

Any opinions/info is appreciated.




CurYellowBird
I can answer any/all questions you may have about the FAST EFI systems, but here's a quick overview of the EZ-EFI system(s):

EZ-EFI TB Pros:
- Easy to install (bolts on instead of a carb)
- No tuning
- It works as advertised
- Great throttle response
- Good drivability, good mileage, good cold start, user can tune the target A/F ratio table as various points (cruise, WOT, etc)

EZ-EFI (TB type) Cons:
- Does not control timing (you use a standard distributor and ignition box)
- Operates in bank-to-bank mode. Not really a draw back because the injectors are in the throttle body.
- Injectors are in TB (wet manifold). Not as "ideal" as port injection.
- Injector sizes limit HP to 550-600 HP for a single TB- No problem if you run two TBs or use the EZ port injected system.
- Requires an EFI fuel system (but any EFI system would)
- Can only drive up to 8 high-Z injectors.

One newer option is the same EZ-EFI ECU but for port injection manifolds. This option gives you more HP capability (8 injectors instead of 4) and the manifold runs dry.

Pricing:
The 30226-kit Single EZ TB (no fuel system components) $1689.
The 30227-kit (30226 kit + fuel system; pump, filters, regulator, etc.) $1945
The 304155 second TB upgrade kit $850
The 302000 EZ-EFI kit for port injection $825

Hope this helps

www.fastmanefi.com


I'm an adovcate of EFI, I can't fathom where better fuel control isn't an advantage. That being said How do these systems deal with a tight LSA cam? Most of my exp is with OEM stuff and MAP/Maf systems don't deal well with the low vacuum/erratic pulses of cams with less that 112* CL.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Skeptic] #752154
01/15/13 07:56 PM
01/15/13 07:56 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560
Downtown Roebuck Ont
Twostick Offline
Still wishing...
Twostick  Offline
Still wishing...

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 6,560
Downtown Roebuck Ont
Mine didn't care for it at all at low rpm with an MP509. Holley 950 Commander Pro TBI. My buddy the guru solved the problem by setting it to run alpha/numeric instead of closed loop under 1800 rpm.

Kevin

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Skeptic] #752155
01/15/13 09:58 PM
01/15/13 09:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
A
ahy Offline
master
ahy  Offline
master
A

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,664
IN
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

I'm looking for mainly opinions on this thread, but also the pros and cons of these two setups.

Of course costs is the REALLY big one and which is more simplistic. Seems like you could always take the costs of an EFI system, get a decent carb and put the rest of the money towards other parts of the car.

Any opinions/info is appreciated.




CurYellowBird
I can answer any/all questions you may have about the FAST EFI systems, but here's a quick overview of the EZ-EFI system(s):

EZ-EFI TB Pros:
- Easy to install (bolts on instead of a carb)
- No tuning
- It works as advertised
- Great throttle response
- Good drivability, good mileage, good cold start, user can tune the target A/F ratio table as various points (cruise, WOT, etc)

EZ-EFI (TB type) Cons:
- Does not control timing (you use a standard distributor and ignition box)
- Operates in bank-to-bank mode. Not really a draw back because the injectors are in the throttle body.
- Injectors are in TB (wet manifold). Not as "ideal" as port injection.
- Injector sizes limit HP to 550-600 HP for a single TB- No problem if you run two TBs or use the EZ port injected system.
- Requires an EFI fuel system (but any EFI system would)
- Can only drive up to 8 high-Z injectors.

One newer option is the same EZ-EFI ECU but for port injection manifolds. This option gives you more HP capability (8 injectors instead of 4) and the manifold runs dry.

Pricing:
The 30226-kit Single EZ TB (no fuel system components) $1689.
The 30227-kit (30226 kit + fuel system; pump, filters, regulator, etc.) $1945
The 304155 second TB upgrade kit $850
The 302000 EZ-EFI kit for port injection $825

Hope this helps

www.fastmanefi.com


I'm an adovcate of EFI, I can't fathom where better fuel control isn't an advantage. That being said How do these systems deal with a tight LSA cam? Most of my exp is with OEM stuff and MAP/Maf systems don't deal well with the low vacuum/erratic pulses of cams with less that 112* CL.




I'm running the past generation XFI on a 496 wedge with 242@.050 cam on a 108 CL. Its an MM lobe Muscle Motors cam. The XFI handles it fine. Basic tuning procedure is to set the timing roughly right, adjust the throttle close stop screw for low IAC opening and then tweak timing and mixture. Some adjustment of idle "gains" may be needed as well. I got decent idle with around 13" vacuum at 850 RPM.

Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: ahy] #752156
01/15/13 11:42 PM
01/15/13 11:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,890
Athens, Greece
Pyper70 Offline
master
Pyper70  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,890
Athens, Greece
I am a proponent of carb's...I should however that although EFI is a novelty and possibly a wise upgrade for these cars...I can't seem to justify dropping 2000 bucks on a system like that. If its ready to go like a modern 6.1 Hemi and it comes with the engine harness in a kit, then yes...by all means.

Most people like their Barry Grants, their Demon's, they Holleys. I have had the latter from that list and it was always a PITA. I want to get in, turn the key, and GO!

A majority of have 4bbl motors, some others have the six-pack. A few, and the minority, have dual quads and thats where I stand. I collected parts for 10 years, all new mind you. CH-28, Dual 500 Edelbrocks, the linkages, the throttle cables, etc..I took my time with it while running my 4bbl RPM and 750 Eddy. That carb got me from L.A. to Savannah, Ga in 3 1/2 days, 155 gallons of fuel, 2610 miles of America (Thats 17mpg) What will you get with an EFI, probably not too much better than that on a 440.

I don't particularly use elevation as a reason for my purchase. I am 360' above sea level. The most I have traveled here (altitude-wise) is 1200 feet. I typically get 78º-95º weather here when I do take my car out for a drive.

Compound all those details now with my car having a Gear Vendors, the HP logs for exhaust, 28" tire, and that I replaced my single carb setup for a Dual Quad setup two years ago. My mpg dropped a little bit because I like to play...and why not? I can keep my foot off the gas and just cruise but almost always I tend to find something/someone to harass while driving her. 15mpg with Dual Quads on a 440....what's more is I invested in a wideband o2 sensor. Stays in the car, hooks up to the ashtray in a pelican case. I can see where I am from 750rpm up to 6000rpm. I have a stickypod so I can record both my RPM and my A/F meter and make adjustments when I get home. $300 on an a/f meter is an investment when you have a single carb but its a necessity when you have two or three carbs to adjust. We can all dial in a motor to a visual base and a timing light but when you drive you need a sniffer. All in all, I have $1000 between my carbs/manifold...tack in the 300 extra for the A/F meter. No extra wires, no added modules to take up space in your engine bay, you can't even see my MSD box and no it's not in the engine bay. Sometimes you need simplicity and ease of use and Carb's have given that to me, given I don't have the privilege to drive my car like many of you Stateside, if I breakdown I can zero in on whats going on quicker than you guys with your EFi, your sensors, and your computers. Thats all my


Family owned 1969 Charger R/T DualQuad 440/727/GVO/3.55s
Re: Fuel Injection vs. Carburetor BB [Re: Pyper70] #752157
01/16/13 05:13 PM
01/16/13 05:13 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
Skeptic Offline
master
Skeptic  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,395
The Pale Blue Dot
I'm on the bubble right now, the motor I'm getting done has a comp thumper cam, so it's not gonna have a smooth idle The Offy dual quad tunnel ram means 2 throttle body assemblies and the related $$. I've thought about junkyarding an EFI system together, but I just don't have the time for that and want to get the car running. I've got a pair of AVS carbs, now, so I may just rebuild them and get the calibraion kits. I have a wideband gauge for the car. I was hopeing for more info on the options down the line.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1