Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
1.5 vs 1.6 Rocker Ratio #669360
04/13/10 10:52 PM
04/13/10 10:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Amarillo, Texas
R
red70duster Offline OP
member
red70duster  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Amarillo, Texas
Has anyone tried using 1.6 ratio rocker arms with Edelbrock heads? I thought about switching to 1.6's to increase the lift on my 555 lift Isky cam but I am wondering if I will run into interference problems with the pushrods and heads?

GM

Re: 1.5 vs 1.6 Rocker Ratio [Re: red70duster] #669361
04/14/10 12:23 AM
04/14/10 12:23 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,517
pacific northwest
S
Stroker Scamp Offline
master
Stroker Scamp  Offline
master
S

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,517
pacific northwest
got 1.6 T&D's on my SB eddys no clearance issues


footbrake N/A SB 408 Scamp 10.10 @ 132 street/strip
73 Duster 340 street strip 12.79 @ 105
Re: 1.5 vs 1.6 Rocker Ratio [Re: red70duster] #669362
04/14/10 01:26 AM
04/14/10 01:26 AM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,213
Bend,OR USA
C
Cab_Burge Offline
I Win
Cab_Burge  Offline
I Win
C

Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 43,213
Bend,OR USA
I put a new set (two years ago now) of Harland Sharp 1.6 on my Eddy RPM BB heads, I had to grind on one (#6 intake port) head and ended up putting a hole in the side of the #6 intake port CNC ported heads I had it welded up and it is fine now my Harland Sharps check at the retainers to actually have 1.64 ratio instead of 1.60 I have another set of Harland Sharp 1.5 (twenty years old, not much use on them )that are on a unported set of Eddy RPM and they fit fine, no mods required I also have a set of Indy SR heads that I put a set of T&D 1.65 rockers on and they needed grinding also, no holes on them IHTHs. BTW, the change of rockers did help that motor, The old set of CAT rockers checked at the retainers to be 1.46 ratio instead of 1.60


Mr.Cab Racing and winning with Mopars since 1964. (Old F--t, Huh)
Re: 1.5 vs 1.6 Rocker Ratio [Re: Cab_Burge] #669363
04/14/10 09:49 AM
04/14/10 09:49 AM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,542
BROOK PARK, OH
WILD BILL Offline
Senior Member of the Junior Dragster Club
WILD BILL  Offline
Senior Member of the Junior Dragster Club

Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,542
BROOK PARK, OH
IF your using 3/8's push rods I would think you would have a clearnce issue.


I did.

Re: 1.5 vs 1.6 Rocker Ratio [Re: WILD BILL] #669364
04/14/10 10:55 AM
04/14/10 10:55 AM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Amarillo, Texas
R
red70duster Offline OP
member
red70duster  Offline OP
member
R

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 81
Amarillo, Texas
Thanks for the replys. I'm currently running Harland Sharp 1.5 with the Edelbrocks and no issues. I thought trying a set of 1.6's like the ones for sale by a member here would be a good way to see if the car would like more lift. Since the heads have not been ported I have my doubts. My pushrods are 5/16 Comp Cams.

Thanks
GM

Re: 1.5 vs 1.6 Rocker Ratio [Re: red70duster] #669365
04/15/10 12:54 PM
04/15/10 12:54 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 146
Pittsburgh, PA
bobdog106 Offline
member
bobdog106  Offline
member

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 146
Pittsburgh, PA
I tried both Crane 1.5 and 1.6 with Big block RPM and had no clearance issues. Did not notice a big increase in power either though, so I now have Harland 1.5's.

Re: 1.5 vs 1.6 Rocker Ratio [Re: bobdog106] #669366
04/15/10 05:53 PM
04/15/10 05:53 PM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,013
South Park, Pa.
68LAR Offline
master
68LAR  Offline
master

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,013
South Park, Pa.
Quote:

Did not notice a big increase in power either though, so I now have Harland 1.5's.



I thought that an increase in lift will increase torque, not horse power?


4 speed street legal. Best time 10.99 @ 124 mph on 93 octane pump gas @ 3926# total weight
Re: 1.5 vs 1.6 Rocker Ratio [Re: 68LAR] #669367
04/16/10 09:26 AM
04/16/10 09:26 AM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
B
BobR Offline
master
BobR  Offline
master
B

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 8,165
Left Coast
Quote:

Quote:

Did not notice a big increase in power either though, so I now have Harland 1.5's.



I thought that an increase in lift will increase torque, not horse power?




That depends on where the head flows best.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1