Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
correct radiator number #3207126
01/22/24 10:55 AM
01/22/24 10:55 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,188
imperial mo.
S
stickman Offline OP
super stock
stickman  Offline OP
super stock
S

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,188
imperial mo.
Looking at Galens white book I am confused. I have a 1970 r/t se challenger with a U code 440 and a/c. I thought 2998956 was correct but his book also list a 2998961. It has a automatic and is a LA built car. Thanks Guys.


YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH.


EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger
Re: correct radiator number [Re: stickman] #3207166
01/22/24 01:09 PM
01/22/24 01:09 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,791
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,791
Rio Linda, CA
The FSM shows the 956 as A/C with standard cooling, the 961 is maximum cooling...probably a thicker core.

Rad.PNG

The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: correct radiator number [Re: John_Kunkel] #3207226
01/22/24 03:34 PM
01/22/24 03:34 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,188
imperial mo.
S
stickman Offline OP
super stock
stickman  Offline OP
super stock
S

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,188
imperial mo.
Thanks John. I think I will go with the 956.


YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH.


EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger
Re: correct radiator number [Re: John_Kunkel] #3207252
01/22/24 05:10 PM
01/22/24 05:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
Originally Posted by John_Kunkel
The FSM shows the 956 as A/C with standard cooling, the 961 is maximum cooling...probably a thicker core.


The page you posted says the opposite ????


running up my post count some more .
Re: correct radiator number [Re: stickman] #3207262
01/22/24 05:27 PM
01/22/24 05:27 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,024
NJ
EV2RTSE Offline
super stock
EV2RTSE  Offline
super stock

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,024
NJ
I think it depends on the axle ratio. My 70 383 Challenger R/T SE automatic, 3.23 with a/c has the 961 radiator. I believe if you ordered a 383 and A36 axle package with 3.55s, with or without a/c, then you got the 956. Could you also get a 440 auto with 3.55s and a/c, or just 3.23s? As far as what's correct, I believe a 440 3.23 with a/c also got the 961. A 961 is a two row, and a 956 is a 3 row. For real world driving a 3 row is of course better, I'll be replacing the core in my 961 with a 3 row when the time comes.




Re: correct radiator number [Re: EV2RTSE] #3207372
01/23/24 12:19 AM
01/23/24 12:19 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,188
imperial mo.
S
stickman Offline OP
super stock
stickman  Offline OP
super stock
S

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,188
imperial mo.
Mine has the 3.23 rear in it.


YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH.


EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger
Re: correct radiator number [Re: stickman] #3207464
01/23/24 11:36 AM
01/23/24 11:36 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
JohnRR Offline
I Win
JohnRR  Offline
I Win

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,005
U.S.S.A.
Originally Posted by stickman
Mine has the 3.23 rear in it.


Then it SHOULD have had the 961 ? Do you have the broadcast sheet ?


running up my post count some more .
Re: correct radiator number [Re: JohnRR] #3207520
01/23/24 01:48 PM
01/23/24 01:48 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,791
Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel Offline
Too Many Posts
John_Kunkel  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,791
Rio Linda, CA
Originally Posted by JohnRR
Originally Posted by John_Kunkel
The FSM shows the 956 as A/C with standard cooling, the 961 is maximum cooling...probably a thicker core.


The page you posted says the opposite ????


Sorry, having a senior moment.


The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
Re: correct radiator number [Re: John_Kunkel] #3207531
01/23/24 02:10 PM
01/23/24 02:10 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,428
It's a dry heat
gtx6970 Offline
Too Many Posts
gtx6970  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,428
It's a dry heat
Best I remember. a 956 is a 3 row . 961 is 2 row core

Re: correct radiator number [Re: JohnRR] #3207535
01/23/24 02:18 PM
01/23/24 02:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,652
Hamtramck, PA
A
Alaskan_TA Offline
Fluffy Balladeer
Alaskan_TA  Offline
Fluffy Balladeer
A

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,652
Hamtramck, PA
Originally Posted by JohnRR
Originally Posted by John_Kunkel
The FSM shows the 956 as A/C with standard cooling, the 961 is maximum cooling...probably a thicker core.


The page you posted says the opposite ????


It does, but to be fair he does list a disclaimer of sorts in his posts;


kunkle copy.jpg
Re: correct radiator number [Re: JohnRR] #3207587
01/23/24 05:43 PM
01/23/24 05:43 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,188
imperial mo.
S
stickman Offline OP
super stock
stickman  Offline OP
super stock
S

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,188
imperial mo.
No broadcast sheet. Just the fender tag. Thanks for the reply, hope life has been good to you John.

Last edited by stickman; 01/23/24 05:44 PM.

YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH.


EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1