correct radiator number
#3207126
01/22/24 10:55 AM
01/22/24 10:55 AM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,191 imperial mo.
stickman
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,191
imperial mo.
|
Looking at Galens white book I am confused. I have a 1970 r/t se challenger with a U code 440 and a/c. I thought 2998956 was correct but his book also list a 2998961. It has a automatic and is a LA built car. Thanks Guys.
YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH.
EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger
|
|
|
Re: correct radiator number
[Re: stickman]
#3207166
01/22/24 01:09 PM
01/22/24 01:09 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,899 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,899
Rio Linda, CA
|
The FSM shows the 956 as A/C with standard cooling, the 961 is maximum cooling...probably a thicker core.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: correct radiator number
[Re: John_Kunkel]
#3207226
01/22/24 03:34 PM
01/22/24 03:34 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,191 imperial mo.
stickman
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,191
imperial mo.
|
Thanks John. I think I will go with the 956.
YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH.
EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger
|
|
|
Re: correct radiator number
[Re: John_Kunkel]
#3207252
01/22/24 05:10 PM
01/22/24 05:10 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,070 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,070
U.S.S.A.
|
The FSM shows the 956 as A/C with standard cooling, the 961 is maximum cooling...probably a thicker core. The page you posted says the opposite ????
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: correct radiator number
[Re: EV2RTSE]
#3207372
01/23/24 12:19 AM
01/23/24 12:19 AM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,191 imperial mo.
stickman
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,191
imperial mo.
|
Mine has the 3.23 rear in it.
YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH.
EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger
|
|
|
Re: correct radiator number
[Re: stickman]
#3207464
01/23/24 11:36 AM
01/23/24 11:36 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,070 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,070
U.S.S.A.
|
Mine has the 3.23 rear in it. Then it SHOULD have had the 961 ? Do you have the broadcast sheet ?
running up my post count some more .
|
|
|
Re: correct radiator number
[Re: JohnRR]
#3207520
01/23/24 01:48 PM
01/23/24 01:48 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,899 Rio Linda, CA
John_Kunkel
Too Many Posts
|
Too Many Posts
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 25,899
Rio Linda, CA
|
The FSM shows the 956 as A/C with standard cooling, the 961 is maximum cooling...probably a thicker core. The page you posted says the opposite ???? Sorry, having a senior moment.
The INTERNET, the MISinformation superhighway
|
|
|
Re: correct radiator number
[Re: JohnRR]
#3207535
01/23/24 02:18 PM
01/23/24 02:18 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,654 Hamtramck, PA
Alaskan_TA
Fluffy Balladeer
|
Fluffy Balladeer
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 29,654
Hamtramck, PA
|
The FSM shows the 956 as A/C with standard cooling, the 961 is maximum cooling...probably a thicker core. The page you posted says the opposite ???? It does, but to be fair he does list a disclaimer of sorts in his posts;
|
|
|
Re: correct radiator number
[Re: JohnRR]
#3207587
01/23/24 05:43 PM
01/23/24 05:43 PM
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,191 imperial mo.
stickman
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,191
imperial mo.
|
No broadcast sheet. Just the fender tag. Thanks for the reply, hope life has been good to you John.
Last edited by stickman; 01/23/24 05:44 PM.
YOU CAN`T RUN WITH THE BIG DOGS IF YOU NEVER LEAVE THE PORCH.
EB5 70 U Code RT/SE Shaker Challenger
|
|
|
|
|