Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
1955 Chrysler c300 #3194459
11/30/23 12:38 PM
11/30/23 12:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 453
PNW
B
Beebuzzn Offline OP
mopar
Beebuzzn  Offline OP
mopar
B

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 453
PNW
This looks interesting and would have been fun ride when new.
https://portland.craigslist.org/clk/cto/d/kalama-1955-chrysler-c300/7691796430.html

Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: Beebuzzn] #3194460
11/30/23 12:44 PM
11/30/23 12:44 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,406
It's a dry heat
gtx6970 Offline
Too Many Posts
gtx6970  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 21,406
It's a dry heat
A touch high. But not much


There is a guy on the east coast buying these 55-56 cars up and dropping them on later model chassis powertrain conversions and getting serious big bucks for them.
He bought a friend of mines 55 and it was a running driving nice original car. for $30k
All he wanted was the body

Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: gtx6970] #3194511
11/30/23 03:18 PM
11/30/23 03:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,755
A collage of whims
topside Offline
Too Many Posts
topside  Offline
Too Many Posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 20,755
A collage of whims
I've seen that guy's work on a couple he did - pretty impressive in photos.

Interesting that this one and the '57 300C in another post both have their LF door interior trim removed.
Wild guess is the sellers were defeated - "that's the last straw !" - by power windows ?

Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: topside] #3194781
12/01/23 10:14 PM
12/01/23 10:14 PM
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
Jim_Lusk Offline
I Live Here
Jim_Lusk  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 18,678
Fresno, CA
Price seems very fair to me. Good thing I'm not in the market...

Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: Jim_Lusk] #3195025
12/02/23 11:30 PM
12/02/23 11:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480
Minnesota
Hemi_Joel Offline
master
Hemi_Joel  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480
Minnesota
That actually seems a little low for a complete, solid 300


[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]
31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum
RS23J71
RS27J77
RP23J71
RO23J71
WM21J8A
I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do.
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: Beebuzzn] #3195350
12/04/23 06:16 PM
12/04/23 06:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
N
NANKET Offline
master
NANKET  Offline
master
N

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
Yes fun when new, and everything worked, no rust, and no pitting on the chrome! LOL

If you were given that car and 10K in cash you would be upside down real quick. DAMHIK

Problem here is: 6 volts, 2 forward speeds and only 331 cubic inches. 1955 is the wrong year for these letter cars.[b][/b]

Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: NANKET] #3195353
12/04/23 06:35 PM
12/04/23 06:35 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,282
Florida
blewbyu Offline
master
blewbyu  Offline
master

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,282
Florida
I think this was the best looking year of them.

Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: blewbyu] #3195381
12/04/23 09:43 PM
12/04/23 09:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
N
NANKET Offline
master
NANKET  Offline
master
N

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
1956 had very similar nose, better quarters and taillights, 12 volts, more cubic inches, horsepower and torque.

Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: NANKET] #3195487
12/05/23 02:30 PM
12/05/23 02:30 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 284
STL ,MO
H
Handygun Offline
enthusiast
Handygun  Offline
enthusiast
H

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 284
STL ,MO
Couldn't agree more on the 56. But the 55 is the original.

Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: Handygun] #3195502
12/05/23 03:32 PM
12/05/23 03:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
N
NANKET Offline
master
NANKET  Offline
master
N

Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
Originally Posted by Handygun
Couldn't agree more on the 56. But the 55 is the original.


Just like a 1965 formula S barracuda 273 4bbl 4 speed with a blistering 235 horsepower. It was the original.

Or would you rather have a 68 340? A 69 383 4 speed, a 1969 440 M code, or a 1970 hemi or 440 with a shaker? AAR?
They were a step up from the original

Re: 1955 Chrysler c300 [Re: NANKET] #3195532
12/05/23 06:25 PM
12/05/23 06:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 284
STL ,MO
H
Handygun Offline
enthusiast
Handygun  Offline
enthusiast
H

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 284
STL ,MO
Gotcha, I own a G btw. I like the 56 better between the two, But the 55 was the car that put the Hemi on the map, thats all.







Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1