|
1955 Chrysler c300
#3194459
11/30/23 12:38 PM
11/30/23 12:38 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 453 PNW
Beebuzzn
OP
mopar
|
OP
mopar
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 453
PNW
|
|
|
|
Re: 1955 Chrysler c300
[Re: Jim_Lusk]
#3195025
12/02/23 11:30 PM
12/02/23 11:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480 Minnesota
Hemi_Joel
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 7,480
Minnesota
|
That actually seems a little low for a complete, solid 300
[img]http://i.imgur.com/boeexFms.jpg[/img]31 Plymouth Coupe, 392 Hemi, T56 magnum RS23J71 RS27J77 RP23J71 RO23J71 WM21J8A I don't regret the things I've done. I only regret the things I didn't do. "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something. ~ Plato"
|
|
|
Re: 1955 Chrysler c300
[Re: Handygun]
#3195502
12/05/23 03:32 PM
12/05/23 03:32 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951 northwest USA
NANKET
master
|
master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,951
northwest USA
|
Couldn't agree more on the 56. But the 55 is the original. Just like a 1965 formula S barracuda 273 4bbl 4 speed with a blistering 235 horsepower. It was the original. Or would you rather have a 68 340? A 69 383 4 speed, a 1969 440 M code, or a 1970 hemi or 440 with a shaker? AAR? They were a step up from the original
|
|
|
|
|
|