Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: OriginalRT]
#31521
12/08/06 04:12 PM
12/08/06 04:12 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,041 Oregon
AndyF
OP
I Win
|
OP
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 31,041
Oregon
|
Your results might vary. Remember, I'm working with a 505 inch motor that is 13.5 compression, open headers, big cam, etc.
But yeah, the 950HP carb made 690 hp and the 1050 Dominator went 740 hp. Same motor, same dyno, same day, same intake, etc. The 950HP is a small venturi 4150 carb so maybe a 850DP would make a little more power.
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: AndyF]
#31524
12/08/06 11:31 PM
12/08/06 11:31 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 131 Florida
Wedge
member
|
member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 131
Florida
|
Quote:
I see that we don't have a 700 hp baseline in the archives so I figured I'd take a stab at it. I'm sure it can be done many different ways but this seems to be a fairly cost effective method:
RB block 4.350 bore 4.250 crank with 2.200 pins 6.800 Chevy rods 12.5 CR. (Diamond flat top shelf piston at zero deck) Indy EZ heads with CNC porting by Modern Cylinder Head Indy 440-3 intake or 440-2 with 4500 adapter 1050 Dominator carb Flat tappet cam about the size of a MP .620 2 inch headers
Torque peak should be around 5200 rpm with power peak around 6200 rpm.
Great Thread.
Would you recommend any special block prep(hard block, aftermarket caps, top end oil restrictions)?
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: AndyF]
#31525
12/10/06 01:30 AM
12/10/06 01:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,499
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Quote:
the 950HP carb made 690 hp and the 1050 Dominator went 740 hp. Same motor, same dyno, same day, same intake, etc.
i'll have to try that test on the 446 i'll be testing here shortly. i dont expect to see anywhere near that much difference on the smaller motor.
when you ran the 440-2, did you use a spacer under the carb?? if not, then you're really comparing the big carb, with a 2" spacer, vs the small carb with no spacer.
some data: my 451 used 960cfm at 7500rpm, and my buddies 557 used 1050cfm at 7000...same carb, same manifold.
my motor peaked at 7300, his peaked at 6400.
at peak power, my motor used 953cfm, his used 1003cfm.
the bsac at peak hp, my motor = 6.23, his motor = 6.34 the bsac at peak tq, my motor = 5.61, his motor = 5.52
i did do the carb test on a 600hp 446 a year or so ago with std port SR heads and a Victor intake:
Victor with 2" Super Sucker and HP950 carb = 544.4 ft/lbs @ 5300, 608.0hp @ 6500
Victor with Moroso 2" adapter and 1050 carb = 546.0 ft/lbs @ 5100, 613.9hp @ 6500
Victor with Moroso 2" adapter and Pro-Systems 1080 carb = 549.6 ft/lbs @ 5200, 615.2hp @ 6500
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: fast68plymouth]
#31527
12/10/06 10:30 AM
12/10/06 10:30 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928 NC
440Jim
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
|
Quote:
Quote:
the 950HP carb made 690 hp and the 1050 Dominator went 740 hp. Same motor, same dyno, same day, same intake, etc.
i'll have to try that test on the 446 i'll be testing here shortly. i dont expect to see anywhere near that much difference on the smaller motor.
On a smaller CID motor with smaller heads, intake, and cam, I agree. But I track tested my 511 with my 950hp carb and my 1150 Dominator and it was 0.2 seconds different. 1050 adapter with the 440-2 (modified), and no spacer with the 950hp (trying to slow it down for the 10.00 class). That is about 45 horsepower at my ET/weight.
Then again my buddy's 499 CID with SR heads, 400-2 intake, and smaller headers saw very little improvement going from my 950hp with 1" spacer to his 1050 Pro Systems Dominator with the adapter. And it wasn't the 1050 carb's fault, as we swapped my 1150 carb onto his car and it ran the same. Something else is the limiting factor on his combo.
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: BradH]
#31529
12/10/06 01:24 PM
12/10/06 01:24 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,717 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.
PUNK
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,717
Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.
|
Quote:
Quote:
470"... 10.9:1 compression, pump gas, Box Stock Victor heads and manifold with a .670 lift solid roller with [Email]270@.050.[/Email] It made 711 horsepower with a 1000 cfm 4150 carb.
On whose dyno? Sounds to me.
Well, I just had my buddy read these posts about his combo and he laughed at all the doubt, but he did correct me at one thing and that was the carb. He only had two carbs, one 950 and the other a dominator. The Dominator is what made the 711 hp and the 950cfm 4150 made 694 hp. He also dropped on a set of stock performer RPMs as a comparison and the engine only made 620 hp. This same engine had a set of ported RPMs on it in the past and it made I believe 670 hp. But I guess all these numbers are all fabricated unless you actually witness the engine on a reputable dyno. Have fun tearing up these numbers to.
10.53 @ 125mph. 1.37 60 foot. Caltracs and Monoleafs, AFCO shocks.
Heads by INDIO MOTOR MACHINE; IMM. CP Pistons, PC Carbs.
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: PUNK]
#31530
12/10/06 10:29 PM
12/10/06 10:29 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
Taking time off to work on my car
|
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Quote:
I guess all these numbers are all fabricated unless you actually witness the engine on a reputable dyno. Have fun tearing up these numbers to.
I have no doubt that his engine made the numbers you stated on that particular dyno. I also have serious doubts that those same combinations you described would make those #s on the dyno I've used for my last two dyno sessions.
This is just one more good example of why you can't compare the results of different dynos or different flow benches.
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: PUNK]
#31531
05/12/07 06:01 PM
05/12/07 06:01 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,717 Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.
PUNK
top fuel
|
top fuel
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,717
Rancho Cucamonga, Calif.
|
Well, Im sure everyones read the Victor engine build article by now showing the possibilities of these heads. They are killer heads. Now only if they were more easily available.
10.53 @ 125mph. 1.37 60 foot. Caltracs and Monoleafs, AFCO shocks.
Heads by INDIO MOTOR MACHINE; IMM. CP Pistons, PC Carbs.
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: PUNK]
#31532
05/12/07 10:01 PM
05/12/07 10:01 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,875 Weddington, N.C.
Streetwize
master
|
master
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,875
Weddington, N.C.
|
Are we saying an OOTB Victor will go 700hp with a 906 port window? Find that tough to believe from what I've seen of it (it just looks a little small for that HP) but I suspect it might with enough CR and a big enough cam opened early and with a tight center. I remember reading somewhere the Vic is limited to a 2.19" intake valve, is that right? Fast's new test of a 505 is right down the pipe of how I'd do it for an automatic equipped B or E body, but I'd be curious to see an SR withan equal Intake and a better Exhaust port....the EZ's achilles heel is the low exhaust port but enough CR and a longer duration can offset a 'weak' port. I suspect an SR as described might make another 20 or so all else being equal. I'd love to see what the Chapman 285 (flows at .500 what the EZ does at .600 and another +30 at .6) would do on that combo. A dominator will typically out et a comparable 4150 down the track (assumin enough gear and stall) because there will be less of a pressure drop across the venturis at WOT which normally equates to more torque being produced down the track. That said, unless you have enough stall to take WOT off the line, your results may vary. I'd love to see a 700HP 'real street' combo...i.e, one that is truly docile enough for street driving with these conditions/stipulations....The motor's gotta fit under a Stock B or E hood (so the car looks outwardly visually "correct"), run a 3500 max stall and on pump gas and put a 3800 pound car well into the 10's with no more than a 3.91 gear.
Last edited by Streetwize; 05/12/07 11:15 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: AndyF]
#31533
12/07/10 11:41 PM
12/07/10 11:41 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,129 Cleveland
sunroofgtx
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 12,129
Cleveland
|
Been a while , how bout a bump, and add Firecore50 Ignition Wires.. !!
Good thread.
Join the quickest team in motorsports. Team FireCore. CustomWiresets.com
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: sunroofgtx]
#31534
12/08/10 12:09 AM
12/08/10 12:09 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439 Val-haul-ass... eventually
BradH
Taking time off to work on my car
|
Taking time off to work on my car
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15,439
Val-haul-ass... eventually
|
Quote:
Been a while , how bout a bump, and add Firecore50 Ignition Wires.. !!
Uhhhh... 3 years and 7 months since this was last updated before today???
Things a little slow around the Wire Factory, Rick?
|
|
|
Re: 700 hp default combo?
[Re: BradH]
#31535
12/08/10 02:48 AM
12/08/10 02:48 AM
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399 Aurora, Colorado
451Mopar
master
|
master
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,399
Aurora, Colorado
|
I'll take donations to dyno the 500" stroked 400 I'd be happy if it makes 700 HP. Basic 500" stroker low deck short block, 4.375" bore, 4.150" stroke, 6.76" Rods, KB/ICON forged flat tops. With The Victor MW heads and cometic 0.040" gasket, about 12.4:1 compression. Added BCR aluminum mains with girdle, Milodon oil pan, internal 1/2" pickup, ATI dampner, Hi-Volume oil pump. Heads are the max wedge Edelbrock Victors, currently only mildly ported, with multi-angle valve job and alot of pushrod clearancing. I tried to get 2.00" install height on the valve springs, but ran out of clearance between the retainer and rocker arm. If you plan to run these heads with over 0.700" lift, I would get the heads bare, and use valves with 0.100" longer valve stems. I ended up milling off the rocker stands anyhow. Used T&D 1.6:1 rocker arms. I think these have an intake offset of 0.700". Custom pushrods with the intake 0.025" longer than the exhaust because of the rocker offset. I used the PAC-1325 valve springs, crower Ti retainers that should handle a pretty agressive roller cam. Probably overkill for my mild cam, but with a bigger cam, I would have to deepen the piston valve reliefs. The cam is a custom Comp solid roller with the HXL lobes, 264/264 @ 0.050" duration, 0.714"/0.714" lift, 112 LSA (it in a heavy street/strip car) installed at 108 cl (I may retard it, has plenty of torque.) Intake is an Indy 400-2 4150 intake so I could re-use my Holley 1,000 cfm carb and also so it would fit under the cars hood (factory '72 Charger Power bulge hood.) I am also re-using my Hooker 2" super comp headers going into a 3" dual TTI exhaust system with crossover and the super turbo mufflers.
|
|
|
|
|