Re: trick flow 240 VS. Perf. r.p.m. port molds.
[Re: 67_Satellite]
#2260116
02/26/17 10:04 PM
02/26/17 10:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,022 Andrews,In. U.S.of A.
67_Satellite
OP
super stock
|
OP
super stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,022
Andrews,In. U.S.of A.
|
If someone more computer savvy than I wants to convert the links to pics, feel free to do so.We speculated that the 270 head would probably just stick a max wedge inlet on the intake manifold side of the port.
Last edited by 67_Satellite; 02/26/17 10:14 PM.
|
|
|
Re: trick flow 240 VS. Perf. r.p.m. port molds.
[Re: BradH]
#2260354
02/27/17 11:08 AM
02/27/17 11:08 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051 The Great White North
RAMM
super stock
|
super stock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,051
The Great White North
|
Seriouslt considering these heads for this years EMC build. Now I'm not so sure I see anything worth it. I've seen 2 builds, 1 local to me that @ 446 cubes struggled to make 600HP. I'm thinking ported E-heads are probably just as good and a bit cheaper. J.Rob
2009 PHR\EMC Competitor 2010 PHR\EMC Competitor 2011 PHR\EMC Competitor 2012 PHR\EMC Competitor 2013 PHR\EMC Competitor 2014 HotRod/EMC Competitor 2015 HotRod/EMC NoShow 2016 HotRod/EMC 3rd place SPEC Bigblock 2018 HotRod/EMC 7th place G3
|
|
|
Re: trick flow 240 VS. Perf. r.p.m. port molds.
[Re: 67_Satellite]
#2260509
02/27/17 02:38 PM
02/27/17 02:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
I might be way out in left field, but I kinda feel like the smaller exhaust valve, along with the smallish exhaust port on the TF head is not really the hot ticket for big power.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
Re: trick flow 240 VS. Perf. r.p.m. port molds.
[Re: 67_Satellite]
#2260570
02/27/17 04:35 PM
02/27/17 04:35 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,237 North Central, Indiana
Roughbird72
pro stock
|
pro stock
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,237
North Central, Indiana
|
Btw, on 67_Satellite's bench the ootb flow numbers on 1 chamber.
Intake 319.3 @ .650 Exhaust 263.4 @ .650
He did check an intake on another chamber and I believe it was slightly more than 320.
Last edited by bubby440; 02/27/17 04:37 PM.
72 Plymouth Roadrunner 11.08@123.25
|
|
|
Re: trick flow 240 VS. Perf. r.p.m. port molds.
[Re: Roughbird72]
#2260586
02/27/17 05:13 PM
02/27/17 05:13 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514 So. Burlington, Vt.
fast68plymouth
I Live Here
|
I Live Here
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,514
So. Burlington, Vt.
|
Btw, on 67_Satellite's bench the ootb flow numbers on 1 chamber.
Intake 319.3 @ .650 Exhaust 263.4 @ .650
He did check an intake on another chamber and I believe it was slightly more than 320.
I assume the exhaust number was achieved using some sort of flow tube.
68 Satellite, 383 with stock 906’s, 3550lbs, 11.18@123 Dealer for Comp Cams/Indy Heads
|
|
|
|
|