Re: Should my K frame look like this?
[Re: A12]
#215334
02/06/09 10:59 AM
02/06/09 10:59 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,043 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,043
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
tough to tell from the photos but it looks damaged to me
Definitely is , combo of jacking it there AND bottoming out .
1fastrunner , whats the original engine for your car ??? you could HIDE that damage by adding a repop skidplate
|
|
|
Re: Should my K frame look like this?
[Re: JohnRR]
#215335
02/06/09 11:29 AM
02/06/09 11:29 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,343 SE PA.
QuickBpBp
master
|
master
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,343
SE PA.
|
Quote:
Quote:
tough to tell from the photos but it looks damaged to me
Definitely is , combo of jacking it there AND bottoming out .
1fastrunner , whats the original engine for your car ??? you could HIDE that damage by adding a repop skidplate
I agree with it appearing damaged and here is my factory K-member outta my '72 Gtx a plate will protect and cover that. I don't know how the repo plates fit...
|
|
|
Re: Should my K frame look like this?
[Re: 1fastrunner]
#215337
02/06/09 11:47 AM
02/06/09 11:47 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,043 U.S.S.A.
JohnRR
I Win
|
I Win
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 75,043
U.S.S.A.
|
Quote:
It was a factory 383 car, are those skid plates available? Thanks, Jim
your car would not have had one , if it did it would be bashed in also as the factory one isn't that stout . If your pan is hanging below the K , which it looks like , you definitely want to add one . Yes a repop is available from the usual sources ...
|
|
|
|
|