Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
H Beam Rods #1838640
06/01/15 01:11 PM
06/01/15 01:11 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline OP
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline OP
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
Interesting side by side of a Scat H Beam vs an Offshore H Beam that I can get. Its hard to spot in the images but the Scat is 100 grams heavier.

H Beam Rods 2.jpgH Beam Rods.jpg

T & K Performance
Re: H Beam Rods [Re: ChevyTS] #1838681
06/01/15 01:45 PM
06/01/15 01:45 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Damn.. look at the bevel they use for the radius
on the crank.. that looks big... then also. the area
around the crank.. one has a much larger wall.. I bought
4 sets of Eagle H-beams YEARS ago when they first came out
because they looked damn good back then... I'm still using
them on all my builds
wave

Re: H Beam Rods [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1838712
06/01/15 02:25 PM
06/01/15 02:25 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
D
dogdays Offline
I Live Here
dogdays  Offline
I Live Here
D

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,376
They were both forged in China.

There is weight that adds strength, and weight that adds weight.........

R.

Re: H Beam Rods [Re: dogdays] #1838741
06/01/15 03:07 PM
06/01/15 03:07 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Originally Posted By dogdays
They were both forged in China.

There is weight that adds strength, and weight that adds weight.........

R.


I'm well aware of that
wave

Re: H Beam Rods [Re: ChevyTS] #1838772
06/01/15 03:46 PM
06/01/15 03:46 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline OP
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline OP
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
I will post some more pics as soon as I can. I do have an Eagle rod laying around that I could weigh just for giggles.


T & K Performance
Re: H Beam Rods [Re: ChevyTS] #1838778
06/01/15 03:52 PM
06/01/15 03:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,318
Ohio
J
jlatessa Offline
pro stock
jlatessa  Offline
pro stock
J

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,318
Ohio
Which is which?

The top and left rod has much smoother transition fillets
and looks like it would more easily transfer forces to the beam.

Joe

Re: H Beam Rods [Re: MR_P_BODY] #1839578
06/02/15 10:56 AM
06/02/15 10:56 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
440Jim Offline
I Live Here
440Jim  Offline
I Live Here

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,928
NC
Originally Posted By MR_P_BODY
Damn.. look at the bevel they use for the radius
on the crank.. that looks big...
Are the pictures of the same side of each rod? i.e. the side with the bevel to clear crank journal radius.

It looks like one has larger radii from the ends to the beam, and different length bolts.

Mr. Chevy, can you post the big and small end weights?

Re: H Beam Rods [Re: 440Jim] #1839591
06/02/15 11:23 AM
06/02/15 11:23 AM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
MR_P_BODY Offline
Master
MR_P_BODY  Offline
Master

Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52,972
Romeo MI
Originally Posted By 440Jim
Originally Posted By MR_P_BODY
Damn.. look at the bevel they use for the radius
on the crank.. that looks big...
Are the pictures of the same side of each rod? i.e. the side with the bevel to clear crank journal radius.

It looks like one has larger radii from the ends to the beam, and different length bolts.

Mr. Chevy, can you post the big and small end weights?


I was assuming its the same side Jim... thats how I would
post the pics... A to A and so forth
wave

Re: H Beam Rods [Re: ChevyTS] #1839715
06/02/15 01:54 PM
06/02/15 01:54 PM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
C
ChevyTS Offline OP
mopar
ChevyTS  Offline OP
mopar
C

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 576
Texas
Sorry but the rods were not same side up. Here is another pic.

H Beam Rods 3.jpg
Last edited by ChevyTS; 06/02/15 01:55 PM.

T & K Performance
Re: H Beam Rods [Re: ChevyTS] #1839858
06/02/15 04:59 PM
06/02/15 04:59 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
kansas city mo
T
turbofreek Offline
member
turbofreek  Offline
member
T

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 15
kansas city mo
Bottom one doesnt have the clamping strength of the top one in the cap area. That smooth casting from the radius to the edge is the touching point. Also one allows oil to escape to the edges of the rod for a nice thin layer of oil to prevent side wear.

One clearly has much more detail in finish than the other. Also the pin end the bottom one looks narrow and missing the strength on the edge where the beam finishes up into the pin area.

Budget build sure 450 bucks the bottom will work.

top one will handle more abuse longer. Jmho


dont feel like typing it again






Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1